I mean how they marble it? Is calcining making it black?
I think Jyeshta does it with a black SharpieDoes anyone know how they "calcine" meerschaum?
Then not actually calcined.I think Jyeshta does it with a black Sharpie
From leevancleefpipe.comMy question still stands. How do they marble the "lee van cleef" pipes?
Looking at the example on the website, that result is not the same as Lee Van Cleef's meer, or mine. Those show large blotches of discoloration.From leevancleefpipe.com
The Second Phase of making your replica is known as owen technique by some traditional meerschaum carvers. The Bees Wax is applied on the bowl while it s being heated in the owen at the same time.This process is repeated multiple times taking many hours or sometimes a day depending on the seasonal humidity and drying conditions of the heated beeswax being absorbed permanently by the premium grade blocks.Consequently you Lee Van Cleef Pipe ends up coloring the same way as seen in the movie.Then it is beewaxed two times more to provide an excellent and look.
I think the writer meant "oven" and not "Owen".
I am working on it. But I keep getting out bid. I most likely will go with a 309. It is correctly shaped and a better pipe.Has anyone else gone down this rabbit hole? Please show them.
I got real lucky finding the meer, the only flaw being that it has an amber stem instead of the Bakelite, so the color is off. It's 1910-20, so my thinking that the mottled bowl was a 1960's trick is apparently incorrect. The rim was a mess, but black beneath the gunk - I lost a little of the fluming when restoring and decided not to 're-color'.
Surprisingly, the Wellington has been the most difficult to find - his stummel seemed to be between the shape of a Peterson 301 and 309, which I think this one is. But I have not been able to find the flat ferrule AND the correct stummel shape. This is a 1930's/'40s pipe - not sure when WDC went to the flattened ferrule.
Lee Van Cleef's pipe is approximately a cross between a Peterson 309 and 301 shape;i.e-it's shorter and more squat.I am working on it. But I keep getting out bid. I most likely will go with a 309. It is correctly shaped and a better pipe.
Yes, I agree it is a WDC. But finding a Dutch Billiard shape is nigh impossible and when I do they get bid up right away. If I find a 309 that will work I can have it stained to look like Van Cleefs pipe. it's a challenge either way.Lee Van Cleef's pipe is approximately a cross between a Peterson 309 and 301 shape;i.e-it's shorter and more squat.
I have around ten 309's - my favorite Pete shape.
Yes, finding a WDC that's 'real close' to Lee Van Cleef's pipe is a challenge. That's what the thread was meant to be about.Yes, I agree it is a WDC. But finding a Dutch Billiard shape is nigh impossible and when I do they get bid up right away. If I find a 309 that will work I can have it stained to look like Van Cleefs pipe. it's a challenge either way.
As a fan of the Spaghetti Western's and Lee Van Cleef, I've wanted a LVC pipe for a long time. My problem is that none of them are even close to his. The replicas on the market today just don't work for me. It's because of this I haven't bought one yet.
I own two bent billiards that are similar looking, but without the pre-color. I refer to them as my LVC pipes, but the pipe dimensions are not the same. I'm slowly adding my own color to my pipes in hopes they'll look as cool as his someday. I've got a lot of work to do though.