Is Our Perception Of The Present Entirely Influenced By Memory?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

6 Fresh Savinelli Autograph Pipes
72 Fresh Savinelli Pipes
178 Fresh Peterson Pipes
3 Fresh Lasse Skovgaard Pipes
3 Fresh Bill Shalosky Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Misanthrope

Can't Leave
Apr 26, 2020
367
1,129
Texas
What would you perceive if you don't remember anything, not a single thing? You will have some basic programming assuming you are functioning physically. So you'll be able to see, hear and feel. But you'll have no language. And no prior reference for what you see, hear or feel. You wouldn't know whether you are hot or cold because you can't remember, and hence don't know, what hot or cold is to you. You also don't know what wet or dry feels like. The sights and sounds you perceive will appear completely random and chaotic, and you will be utterly confused.

Ah, yes, the joys of morning. I find a cup of coffee and a nice pipe sorts all that right out for me within an hour.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: romaso and mingc

STP

Lifer
Sep 8, 2020
4,302
9,900
Northeast USA
I remember very little from college, but a course in phenomenology stuck w/me. Essentially, reality is what you experience… ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mingc
It’s called imagination. Imagination does not require a clear path. JFK imagined going to the moon.
I'm not certain that you are interpreting what Lotus is saying correctly. It's like you're reading some of us on here, but your just not "getting" the correct message.
I don't say this to be antagonistic at all. It's just an observation that there is some confusion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: puff_not_snuff
Jan 27, 2020
3,997
8,133
I'm not certain that you are interpreting what Lotus is saying correctly. It's like you're reading some of us on here, but your just not "getting" the correct message.
I don't say this to be antagonistic at all. It's just an observation that there is some confusion.

Reading vs actual comprehension create different perceptions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cosmicfolklore
Mar 2, 2021
3,473
14,254
Alabama USA
I'm not certain that you are interpreting what Lotus is saying correctly. It's like you're reading some of us on here, but your just not "getting" the correct message.
I don't say this to be antagonistic at all. It's just an observation that there is some confusion.
He said perception is entirely predicated on memory. You agreed and I didn't
 

Streeper541

Lifer
Jun 16, 2021
3,206
20,342
44
Spencer, OH
Back in Psychology class I remember it being said;

Perception is the process of sensing in a meaningful way the stimuli we observe in the present.

Memory is the process of storing this perceived information for the purpose of future recall.

I still don't entirely grasp it, but then again... I had trouble with Plato's Allegory of the Cave too. ?
 
I have no idea what it is like to see a tree without all of my understanding of what a tree is. In our culture we think of a blankness, absence, a blank canvas, the untarnished sheet of paper, the whiteness of space awaiting the mark. Whereas anthropology tells us that more remote totally at one with nature cultrures like the tribes of remote Brazil or Africa see black as awaiting the mark. What is it like to see a tree without knowing it’s a plant, future lumber, a home for so many creatures, shade, colors with names, and attributes, alive, was once a seed, growing, ever changing with the seasons. I can only see it through what I am, what I know. I can’t possibly see it as an owl would, or a fish, or someone from the remotest regions on the planets, or an Inuit, or a caterpillar. I am a filter of my mind and all that has had happened to it, what I’ve learned, what I know and don’t know.