@paulfg when you mentioned the placement of the letter, I don’t understand what you mean?
I looked at this even under a magnifying glass, I can truly see no bottom of a P worn off. It still actually looks like the bottom of a D curving around from the bottom left to right.
Here’s the best close up I could take.
@Ahi Ka mentioned to me, how these dates are for the Assay Office, and could of been certified/inspected in 1919, but was later sold, which I mentioned as possibly 1922... hmm ?
The only thing I can think, are the differences from a D & P the upper left tails of the letters sticking out. On Petersonpipenotes a D has a longer tail than a P. hmm ?
I’m in email with Peterson, I sent them this pic.
Thanks everyone!
I looked at this even under a magnifying glass, I can truly see no bottom of a P worn off. It still actually looks like the bottom of a D curving around from the bottom left to right.
Here’s the best close up I could take.
@Ahi Ka mentioned to me, how these dates are for the Assay Office, and could of been certified/inspected in 1919, but was later sold, which I mentioned as possibly 1922... hmm ?
The only thing I can think, are the differences from a D & P the upper left tails of the letters sticking out. On Petersonpipenotes a D has a longer tail than a P. hmm ?
I’m in email with Peterson, I sent them this pic.
Thanks everyone!