Not really. If she really does represent GH, she's been really hateful to members here when asked about the company. I have her on ignore as well.Now that was just rude.
Not really. If she really does represent GH, she's been really hateful to members here when asked about the company. I have her on ignore as well.Now that was just rude.
Not really. If she really does represent GH, she's been really hateful to members here when asked about the company. I have her on ignore as well.
I feel you man. Forums are tough cause you can’t edit what you’ve said after a certain amount of time and everything you say is etched in stone.Maybe the real lesson here is that I shouldn't post before I've had my morning coffee and am all cranky.
We are, that's why we employed the ignore option.still be civil
Your admonishment is noted my new friend. It was given after I apologized, but that’s ok.Well, I suppose all I can say is that two wrongs don't make a right and we can still be civil in spite of the modern world suggesting otherwise. Maybe the real lesson here is that I shouldn't post before I've had my morning coffee and am all cranky.
Your admonishment is noted my new friend. It was given after I apologized, but that’s ok.
Enjoy the rest of your day, and happy smokes to you.
you sir are a rude prickGood, I've just been ignoring her, so I have missed this. My apologies to them. It was just aggravating to be a fan of a thing where the owner was treating us like shit.
Most of the time I can't stand him but he is telling the truth.you sir are a rude prick
Was it still a good smoke though?Looking at my notes for some 2015 vintage 1792 it says “Too old at 8 years”.
YMMV.
there's telling the truth and being rude.you can tell the truth without reasorting to rudenessMost of the time I can't stand him but he is telling the truth.
I saw some bluntness but nothing rude. Actually much kinder than the recipient deserved.there's telling the truth and being rude.you can tell the truth without reasorting to rudeness
Except there used to be similar complaints that blends were too heavily scented.@gawithhoggarth now that there is more consistency in the application of the sauce, can you please increase the quantity applied?
Except there used to be similar complaints that blends were too heavily scented.
And then do we do we try and change it for all blends, only some.....different ones for different markets......increase just a certain component of a topping (there is no one "lakeland essence") but then that may change the way a product has to be registered and recorded.......
Increasing the actual quantity of topping added does not necessarily make it stronger, just makes the tobacco wetter. If you start changing the components of the toppings/flavourings you are changing the recipes and changing the blend and product. Hence why we now stick to the actual recipes and how it was originally recorded as being produced and try and ensure that is the same each time a batch is made.
Please understand that Ennerdale now is the same as it was - its just in the past there was far more variation in batches. There is no 'new' sauce. It's the same. You can't just change the ingredients - that may require a change in registrations, ingredients lists etc. As already stated it is not just a case of adding more sauce - that does not make it stronger, just wetter. As explained in the past there was far more variation in the way the 'sauce' was made - now there is not .gawithhoggarth Please understand I am not trying to be rude or mean in any way.
However, I have smoked 2013 era Ennerdale (still have a little) and the new Ennerdale sauce does NOT compare.
Please, please, please, return my favorite smoke to the way it was. It is by no means my favorite as it is now.
If it means adding more sauce and charging a bit extra, I will gladly pay!!!
Thank you for your consideration.