Help Identify Early Comoy Second?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

9 Fresh Dunhill Pipes
12 Fresh Winslow Pipes
24 Fresh Johs Pipes
18 Fresh Claudio Cavicchi Pipes
120 Fresh Savinelli Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

bayareabriar

Lifer
May 8, 2019
1,078
1,816
I can’t find anything about this little gem. H&H with the shape number. Looks like a mid to late 1920s. Anyone seen these ones before?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0098.jpeg
    IMG_0098.jpeg
    107.1 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0099.jpeg
    IMG_0099.jpeg
    111 KB · Views: 27
  • IMG_0100.jpeg
    IMG_0100.jpeg
    99.6 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_0101.jpeg
    IMG_0101.jpeg
    106.2 KB · Views: 26

jguss

Lifer
Jul 7, 2013
2,686
7,395
The very few mentions of H&H I was able to find (the above advertisement and two listings in the London phone books) all date from 1926-1927, suggesting that H&H, at least under that name, was a shortlived enterprise
 
  • Like
Reactions: bayareabriar

greeneyes

Lifer
Jun 5, 2018
2,273
12,633
To my eye it looks like an H&A in the diamond. The difficulty in this case is that Comoy made pipes for tobacconists and fancy goods merchants, as well as department stores and other businesses. For all we know H&A may have been a shoemaker.
Clipboard02.jpg
 

bayareabriar

Lifer
May 8, 2019
1,078
1,816
In "Who Made That Pipe", H&H is identified as Harcourt & Hamilton,Made in England.
They list no H&A.
I don't believe there is a Comoys 183 shape. That COM is close to Comoy's but seems off. (to my eye)
I have a few 20s Comoys where the shapes aren’t mentioned. Or 1 digit off from being a “globe” shape but it’s an Apple. How accurate are the shape charts for Comoys? I’m assuming from 30s on pretty accurate, but 30s earlier not so much? Is that your experience?
 

bayareabriar

Lifer
May 8, 2019
1,078
1,816
In "Who Made That Pipe", H&H is identified as Harcourt & Hamilton,Made in England.
They list no H&A.
I don't believe there is a Comoys 183 shape. That COM is close to Comoy's but seems off. (to my eye)
I see what you’re saying with the com. Not quite round enough
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcghost