Sorry I'm just biased against acrylic.Doesn't that exclude most of the ones on the market?
Sorry I'm just biased against acrylic.Doesn't that exclude most of the ones on the market?
I am too but I find IMP's stems comfortable.Sorry I'm just biased against acrylic.
I have an SRV with a quite comfortable acrylic stem. It’s the only acrylic stemmed pipe a still own and use.I am too but I find IMP's stems comfortable.
If all pipes had an airway as even and smooth as a drinking straw then that analogy would be correct, but pipes drilled with such precision are the exception rather than the rule.There seems to be some disagreement about whether some pipes smoke better than others. I hear some people say such-and-such pipe is a "good smoker" as opposed to others which may tend to gurgle, whistle, or have a restricted draw, etc. On the other hand, some other members have assured me, comparing pipes is like comparing drinking straws. They all do essentially the same thing, which is deliver smoke to the mouth, and the factors which determine whether or not you get a "good smoke", are related more to tobacco moisture, smoking cadence, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, etc. etc. So, which side do you fall on? Are there "good smokers" and "bad smokers" in the world of pipes, and what factors determine which pipes fall on one or the other side of divide?
Yes, I'm afraid you might be right. The way I see it is, those guys in Turkey who make the meers are basically "carvers", not pipe makers. I suspect most of them don't know the details of what makes a good pipe. They concentrate on making a good looking bowl and the stem is just an after thought.Doesn't that exclude most of the ones on the market?
It's 25% equipment, 75% technique.There seems to be some disagreement about whether some pipes smoke better than others. I hear some people say such-and-such pipe is a "good smoker" as opposed to others which may tend to gurgle, whistle, or have a restricted draw, etc. On the other hand, some other members have assured me, comparing pipes is like comparing drinking straws. They all do essentially the same thing, which is deliver smoke to the mouth, and the factors which determine whether or not you get a "good smoke", are related more to tobacco moisture, smoking cadence, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, etc. etc. So, which side do you fall on? Are there "good smokers" and "bad smokers" in the world of pipes, and what factors determine which pipes fall on one or the other side of divide?
Jesse, I will respectfully disagree that it is 25% equipment and 75% technique. I have owned my share of artisan and factory pipes and since my technique has been pretty solid for a long time, there have been many a pipe that didn't make the cut. I am not talking about 100.00 Savinelli's, but 500.00 Winslows, 1000.00 Formers, 500.00 plus Castello's, brand new 600.00 Dunhills, I could go on for a while but you get my idea. Some guys just know how to make a great pipe almost every time and that makes the quality of the smoke I get superior to just plain good pipes. Yes I can make a shitty pipe smoke as well as it can, but it is still sorely lacking and not an enjoyable smoking experience.It's 25% equipment, 75% technique.
Sure there are good smokers and bad smokers, but very, very few bad smokers. Most pipes smoke about the same, regardless of price. One of my favorite exchanges on the topic happened with a well known collector who was also a Doctor Of Pipes, who said that his Bo Nordhs smoked about as well as his Grabows. For more money you get a more comfortable bit, prettier wood, more interesting shaping, more handwork and a dash of mythological bullshit. These may or may not matter to the individual smoker.
There are experienced expert pipe smokers and inexperienced, novice, and/or occasionally witlessly stupid pipe smokers.
Pipe smoking is simple. Figure out a few things, practice a bit, and it works. Rocket science or brain surgery it isn't.
Some blends do better in larger chambers, others in medium and smaller chambers. It can be useful to have a little variety in terms of chamber sizes and shapes
Smokers like to come up with generally meaningless theories and practices as well as invent all manner of myths. This appears to be especially common with beginning pipe smokers. Perhaps this helps keep things interesting.
Develop sufficient technique and most pipes will offer good service. Lack sufficient technique and no pipe will save you regardless of cost.
Hi Harris,Jesse, I will respectfully disagree that it is 25% equipment and 75% technique. I have owned my share of artisan and factory pipes and since my technique has been pretty solid for a long time, there have been many a pipe that didn't make the cut. I am not talking about 100.00 Savinelli's, but 500.00 Winslows, 1000.00 Formers, 500.00 plus Castello's, brand new 600.00 Dunhills, I could go on for a while but you get my idea. Some guys just know how to make a great pipe almost every time and that makes the quality of the smoke I get superior to just plain good pipes. Yes I can make a shitty pipe smoke as well as it can, but it is still sorely lacking and not an enjoyable smoking experience.
I began collecting American artisan pipes after I got my first Rad Davis in 2012. Shortly after I sold my last Former as it did not smoke as good as the few American artisan pipes I had picked up. I began moving out all my factory pipes like Castello, Viprati, older Caminetto's, Upshalls,Ferndowns,Don Carlos and many others. My collection(38 artisan pipes) now is small in comparison to the 90 I had before the major culling and everyone is a fantastic smoker that are superior to all the pipes I moved out.
This last culling had pipes from fairly good names I moved out Aldens, a Bruce Weaver, 8 Ruthenbergs, a Scott Thile(I still have one of Scott's as it was superior to my other one) and I even moved out a few Rad Davis pipes that were not as good as the ones I kept. I moved out 2 Trever Talbert pipes. There were more but that is enough.
I replenished only 13 pipes and they were all commissions from Jack Howell . The smoking properties come first and looks come second. I would still be buying Jack's pipes if he were still carving.
I am still in the market for quality pipes and when I find them I will add them to my collection, but if I never find one I am very happy with what I have.
Wow! These last few posts on this thread make some statements I find astounding. In the interest of not pissing off any members I think I'll reframe from commenting....
EXACTLY what Warren said ^^For me there are objective and subjective considerations. In the end a pipe must provide a decent smoking experience. Everything from the feel, eye appeal, draw, comfort in the clench and so forth come together to provide such. If a pipe doesn't provide a satisfying smoke, in the bin it goes. It should go without saying that a few bowls are necessary to determine if a pipes stays or ends up in the landfill. I have no interest in supporting someone elses vice so no swapping, trading or gifting.
Why dont you leave the trolling out of the forum that is uncalled for, just because someone likes something different than you you berate them. Go somewhere else if you cant be civil to others and get some help.Hi Harris,
If you had had the sense to go for good makers instead of expensive famous makers you could have avoided all of this angst. And did you?
Instead you focused on losers like Dunhill, and Former. Who would buy from someone named Former? Former what? A former pipe maker? Why not a current pipe maker. If you're going to invest in has beens, what do you expect? Everyone knows that Scandinavian pipes are a racket, like New York City real estate or the two party system. You're better off buying a The Pipe.
Nobody who's knowledgeable about Britwood buys Dunhill. They buy Barling, Comoy, Sasieni, BBB, GBD, Loewe, people who knew how to make a pipe and who were making fine smoking implements when Alfred was still busily soiling his nappies. But you choose Dunhill because it's famous and expensive and are now whining about it. Well, boo hoo for you.
Jack Howell knows how to make a pipe, but evidently he's no longer making them, which is a shame, and probably your fault. You probably asked him to make you a Dunhill copy and that was the straw that broke the camel's back. At least you finally landed with someone good, though you drove him out of the business, so there's hope for you.
Still, most pipes smoke about the same, so your unfortunate collecting decisions didn't do too much damage, and it's really about knowing how to handle your tobacco. Give it a few more decades and it will all become clear, even with your unfortunate choices of pipes and tobaccos.
I have faith in you!
You apparently haven't been "lurking" enough to grasp the site and it's membership. Less typing and more reading will help you to fit in comfortably.Go somewhere else if you cant be civil to others and get some help.
Well that was a perfectly reasonable statement about an obvious misperception I will take your advice.You apparently haven't been "lurking" enough to grasp the site and it's membership. Less typing and more reading will help you to fit in comfortably.