Thank you Bob. Some things I try don’t work out at all?if it works for you. I think it's an o.k. way to pack. I find it's very consistent and that is good.
Thank you Bob. Some things I try don’t work out at all?if it works for you. I think it's an o.k. way to pack. I find it's very consistent and that is good.
?good note. Thank you^^^ This. I started out with a pseudo-Frank’s Method, and it later evolved into a scoop… and go method. Maybe I was just lazy, or in a hurry… IDK, but I’ve been using this technique for years w/success.
Whatever works best for you is the best practice?
None better. ??They're awesome dogs.
wrong attitude. You learned what doesn't work.Thank you Bob. Some things I try don’t work out at all?
No.Is there a method that is superior?
Interesting.. thank you.No.
Of course most people will say "it's all preference" but I'm confident in the principle of packing a pipe with lateral pressure giving the most consistent burn because of uniform tobacco density.
The aim of the Frank Method is to pack your pipe like someone rolling a cigar, leaving the tobacco pressing outward in all directions, versus "three step" where you're just pressing down and inevitably creating layers of density.
In the end my preference is for the Air Pocket pack, which is just Frank Method with only the plug of tobacco at the top of the bowl and leaving the bottom empty, though it's not necessarily just loading the top of the bowl, with some finesse you can load a fairly tall pipe with a single continuous plug.
I do I doHave to smile and shake my head every time I hear about the Frank method.
Why complicate something that is so simple as packing a pipe.
Oh well, if you enjoy.......
?Heh... the three-layer is more complicated than the Frank Method.
Heh... the three-layer is more complicated than the Frank Method.
I'm curious now... Does anyone have a link to this "Frank Method"?
As I live in Germany I suppose I must try this lol