Found a Dunhill U.S. Patent /20

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

New Cigars




PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

DotAndBang’sPipes

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 27, 2016
218
468
43
Orlando, FL
Trying to discern the date of this Dunhill. Pictures to come. The stampings seem to place it in the 1927 range, or the 1940s range, due to the “/20” marking at the end of the patent number. It is also marked “R” and “7” on the smooth space that is the bottom of the bowl. The shape? I believe it’s considered a Pot. The date at the end of the “made in England” seems to be a “7.”

I’m pretty excited about this pipe. A genuinely random find that I wouldn’t have caught without extensive study of Dunhills. (The stamping is almost completely gone). I’m pumped to own and smoke a wonderful piece of History.
 

beefeater33

Lifer
Apr 14, 2014
4,090
6,196
Central Ohio
Congrats! The /20 patent and the 7 after England would place it at the 1927 date.
A 1947 pipe would have the /34 patent number.
You can't go wrong with an older, patent era Dunhill.
The "R" is the shape designation, and you're correct it's a pot, and a damn good smoker of English blends in my opinion.
The random "7" on the bottom is most likely the size of the inner-tube that it originally had.
Looking forward to some pics!!
 

DotAndBang’sPipes

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 27, 2016
218
468
43
Orlando, FL
It’s certainly not in great shape, but for a hundred year old pipe it will fix up nicely and I’m glad to have the original stem! F3F3DC29-C6FB-4A70-B89D-C11BAE1E25C0.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • DB3D723A-88A5-49C3-9A81-CD4F8E2D6C78.jpeg
    DB3D723A-88A5-49C3-9A81-CD4F8E2D6C78.jpeg
    72.3 KB · Views: 25
  • F983799A-E062-4459-B5D7-DB0C34CFAFDC.jpeg
    F983799A-E062-4459-B5D7-DB0C34CFAFDC.jpeg
    117.2 KB · Views: 22
  • 387E93AD-FC35-4717-AC1A-0F3695897147.jpeg
    387E93AD-FC35-4717-AC1A-0F3695897147.jpeg
    92 KB · Views: 22
  • FD64C502-979E-4787-B73B-197727654D1F.jpeg
    FD64C502-979E-4787-B73B-197727654D1F.jpeg
    104.9 KB · Views: 21
  • 32E58CA9-C3D2-4BC7-AF80-18DE1773D747.jpeg
    32E58CA9-C3D2-4BC7-AF80-18DE1773D747.jpeg
    103.3 KB · Views: 19
  • CBCDDA57-C1D7-4100-B7D4-92A12022D11B.jpeg
    CBCDDA57-C1D7-4100-B7D4-92A12022D11B.jpeg
    95 KB · Views: 19
  • 0AFEF673-FF08-427D-AEBC-961F5E6C9B3E.jpeg
    0AFEF673-FF08-427D-AEBC-961F5E6C9B3E.jpeg
    102.1 KB · Views: 20
  • 1E211F73-80AB-4B62-974B-AD310E60ABF9.jpeg
    1E211F73-80AB-4B62-974B-AD310E60ABF9.jpeg
    102.7 KB · Views: 25
  • 22F0F88D-5786-4B9A-A0AB-F509CC575213.jpeg
    22F0F88D-5786-4B9A-A0AB-F509CC575213.jpeg
    75.2 KB · Views: 28
  • 60ABD2D4-5723-483E-A371-2C4ECB0E5F2E.jpeg
    60ABD2D4-5723-483E-A371-2C4ECB0E5F2E.jpeg
    85.2 KB · Views: 29
  • FB5AEC5E-E739-440E-B319-AF3C0591E6CF.jpeg
    FB5AEC5E-E739-440E-B319-AF3C0591E6CF.jpeg
    85.6 KB · Views: 25
  • FD26E989-FAE2-446F-B504-545CBF8E4273.jpeg
    FD26E989-FAE2-446F-B504-545CBF8E4273.jpeg
    101.7 KB · Views: 21
  • EBCE749B-20EE-45CF-BEE0-B45123ECF1F4.jpeg
    EBCE749B-20EE-45CF-BEE0-B45123ECF1F4.jpeg
    71.5 KB · Views: 21
  • EBD75DCB-0C98-4588-B63E-4B0B1C43B7D0.jpeg
    EBD75DCB-0C98-4588-B63E-4B0B1C43B7D0.jpeg
    66.3 KB · Views: 23
M

Magnum207

Guest
What a beautiful old pipe!

Did the bowl crack while reaming, or did you find it that way? Anyway, hopefully someone can guide you in how to possibly repair it. I, fortunately, never had a pipe with a cracked bowl, so I am not certain if you can even repair a bowl crack, or if you could/should smoke it “as is.” Seems you could repair it, given it’s at the rim, however; not sure if a “super glue” or comparable adhesive and immediate clamp would suffice. Others will provide guidance I am certain.
 

DotAndBang’sPipes

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 27, 2016
218
468
43
Orlando, FL
I think I will send it off to someone to repair… although I’m quite worried because I once sent off a precious Barling’s Make and the repair person ( who is well known btw) mistakenly buffed off the stem logo!
 
  • Wow
Reactions: PaulTheScandinavian

sablebrush52

The Bard Of Barlings
Jun 15, 2013
19,775
45,377
Southern Oregon
jrs457.wixsite.com
@sablebrush52 is this one of the black dot dunhill’s?
The subject of black dot Dunhills is controversial. Some believe they're real and some don't. George thinks that the black dots are caused by staining from years of smoking and that none were ever made. I think I own one because the "dot" is not shaped like any other Dunhill dot I own or have seen, and I've seen thousands of them. Mine isn't flat on top, it's a hemisphere, so light glances off of it, revealing the "dot".

I'll just say maybe it is, and maybe it isn't.
 

DotAndBang’sPipes

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 27, 2016
218
468
43
Orlando, FL
I think this is a white dot… When I look at it in the light there is almost a brown/deep red hue to it.

Question:
If I was to restore this myself, is there anything that would make that too risky? I’m not a great restorer but, as long as there’s no logo stamp to contend with on the stem, I don’t suck either. I would use Murphy’s on the bowl, in addition to an ozone treatment, along with a super glue/briar dust combo for the bowl crack.

I’ve read that I don’t have to be too worried about the dot… that it’s an ivory rod. Correct? Should I attempt to get the dot white again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcghost

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
15,808
29,643
45
In the semi-rural NorthEastern USA
It’s certainly not in great shape, but for a hundred year old pipe it will fix up nicely and I’m glad to have the original stem! View attachment 117673
it's one of those legendary black spot pipes. Some great member here told the story of a collector that thought they made some black spot pipes for a wizard king or something stupid like that. You know instead of some pipes get smoked and handled so much the spot turns black.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmybriar

georged

Lifer
Mar 7, 2013
5,542
14,285
The subject of black dot Dunhills is controversial. Some believe they're real and some don't. George thinks that the black dots are caused by staining from years of smoking and that none were ever made.
Not quite.

The "from years of smoking" part is irrelevant UNLESS the cellulose rod that comprises the dot extends into the airway (over-drilling at the time of manufacture). When it does, it's like a slow motion sponge that wicks Smoking Crud up the rod, depositing the solids and eventually turning the dot the same color AS the Crud.

In the meantime, it'll go from bone colored to amber, to tan, to latigo, to walnut. Sometimes with a bit of red/cherry thown in.

I've not only seen it many times but have photos of such cases.


I think I own one because the "dot" is not shaped like any other Dunhill dot I own or have seen, and I've seen thousands of them. Mine isn't flat on top, it's a hemisphere, so light glances off of it, revealing the "dot".
That's simply the result of two things converging: 1) the dot backing out of the hole (which isn't terribly uncommon... I own several and have seen many; and 2) one of the pipe's former owners used a buffer to shine / polish the pipe frequently. Result? Instant round-over into a lovely lens-like hemisphere.

--------------

Regarding material other than white dot rod being found at the white dot position on a Dunhill stem, by far the most likely explanation is when a legit dot backed out completely and was lost, the owner jammed something entertaining/frivolous into the hole. A small synthetic pearl, a circular faux gemstone, etc.

No one has ever unearthed any documentation to support being able to order a real diamond or similar as a dot from Dunhill at any time, anyway.

(Which, in my mind, always begged the question of why anyone who could afford such an indulgence do the deed to a pipe that is otherwise completely average... If the pipe was a spectacular DR H giant, or something, I might lean toward the "VIP special order through VIP special connections" theory. But for a pedestrian group 4 lovat, not so much.)
 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
61,280
564,041
Not quite.

The "from years of smoking" part is irrelevant UNLESS the cellulose rod that comprises the dot extends into the airway (over-drilling at the time of manufacture). When it does, it's like a slow motion sponge that wicks Smoking Crud up the rod, depositing the solids and eventually turning the dot the same color AS the Crud.

In the meantime, it'll go from bone colored to amber, to tan, to latigo, to walnut. Sometimes with a bit of red/cherry thown in.

I've not only seen it many times but have photos of such cases.



That's simply the result of two things converging: 1) the dot backing out of the hole (which isn't terribly uncommon... I own several and have seen many; and 2) one of the pipe's former owners used a buffer to shine / polish the pipe frequently. Result? Instant round-over into a lovely lens-like hemisphere.

--------------

Regarding material other than white dot rod being found at the white dot position on a Dunhill stem, by far the most likely explanation is when a legit dot backed out completely and was lost, the owner jammed something entertaining/frivolous into the hole. A small synthetic pearl, a circular faux gemstone, etc.

No one has ever unearthed any documentation to support being able to order a real diamond or similar as a dot from Dunhill at any time, anyway.

(Which, in my mind, always begged the question of why anyone who could afford such an indulgence do the deed to a pipe that is otherwise completely average... If the pipe was a spectacular DR H giant, or something, I might lean toward the "VIP special order through VIP special connections" theory. But for a pedestrian group 4 lovat, not so much.)
That's good information and observations, George. Would you mind posting a few photos of the "black dots"? I'd like to see them, and I think it'd be very instructive for others to see.
 

sablebrush52

The Bard Of Barlings
Jun 15, 2013
19,775
45,377
Southern Oregon
jrs457.wixsite.com
Not quite.

The "from years of smoking" part is irrelevant UNLESS the cellulose rod that comprises the dot extends into the airway (over-drilling at the time of manufacture). When it does, it's like a slow motion sponge that wicks Smoking Crud up the rod, depositing the solids and eventually turning the dot the same color AS the Crud.

In the meantime, it'll go from bone colored to amber, to tan, to latigo, to walnut. Sometimes with a bit of red/cherry thown in.

I've not only seen it many times but have photos of such cases.



That's simply the result of two things converging: 1) the dot backing out of the hole (which isn't terribly uncommon... I own several and have seen many; and 2) one of the pipe's former owners used a buffer to shine / polish the pipe frequently. Result? Instant round-over into a lovely lens-like hemisphere.

--------------

Regarding material other than white dot rod being found at the white dot position on a Dunhill stem, by far the most likely explanation is when a legit dot backed out completely and was lost, the owner jammed something entertaining/frivolous into the hole. A small synthetic pearl, a circular faux gemstone, etc.

No one has ever unearthed any documentation to support being able to order a real diamond or similar as a dot from Dunhill at any time, anyway.

(Which, in my mind, always begged the question of why anyone who could afford such an indulgence do the deed to a pipe that is otherwise completely average... If the pipe was a spectacular DR H giant, or something, I might lean toward the "VIP special order through VIP special connections" theory. But for a pedestrian group 4 lovat, not so much.)
George,
Has anyone asked Dunhill's archivist about this? (Assuming they still have one.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpmcwjr