Just part of the decline.We live in the age of apathy and crony capitalism, a deadly combination.
We either choose to be good, or... well, you see the rest.
Apologies to Mr. Kant.
Just part of the decline.We live in the age of apathy and crony capitalism, a deadly combination.
That's something for me to ponder. Over a fat bowl of Prince Albert (yes, I'm a philistine) no doubt.crony capitalism and what they call socialism are one and the same
IT'S A GATEWAY DRUG!! :roll: :twisted:Is the FDA fearful that that younger people who are now vaping bubblegum flavored e-cig juice will eventually move up to pipe smoking with Molto Dolce, and or flavored cigars?
crony capitalism and what they call socialism are one and the same
Perhaps not the same in theory, but the same in practice. In other words, whether the government runs the corporations or the corporations run the government, the net result is the same: a revolving door between the corporate boardrooms and the regulatory agencies that ultimately results in organized crime.That's something for me to ponder. Over a fat bowl of Prince Albert (yes, I'm a philistine) no doubt.
People love a scapegoat. Society falls apart like the Greeks did, blame the Jews; people behaving like fools with mind-bending drugs, blame tobacco.Does anyone see the irony that pot is becoming legal in more and more states, while the "war" on tobacco is heating up?
This reminds me of the problem of rules.In other words, whether the government runs the corporations or the corporations run the government, the net result is the same: a revolving door between the corporate boardrooms and the regulatory agencies that ultimately results in organized crime.
The failure of human moral agents to observe the moral law is symptomatic of a character or disposition (Gesinnung) that has been corrupted by an innate propensity to evil, which is to subordinate the moral law to self-conceit. Because this propensity corrupts an agent’s character as a whole, and is the innate “source” of every other evil deed, it may be considered “radical.”
http://www.iep.utm.edu/rad-evil/
Yes very true...government has done just that with the rules it's supposed to be subject to. At least at the time of alcohol prohibition it was understood that it required a constitutional amendment in order for the government to obtain that authority. No such understanding exists any more. Most Americans seem to accept the idea that the feds can regulate and/or outlaw anything they want to. The question of Constitutional authority is never even raised any more.This reminds me of the problem of rules.
Parent: "Jimmy, Rule #1 is that you cannot torment your sister with firecrackers."
"OK," says Jimmy. He runs off and begins tormenting her with a firehose, whips, bb guns, loudspeakers, and anything else he can find.
People like the feeling of being watched over by a benevolent superstate. That's my only explanation.Most Americans seem to accept the idea that the feds can regulate and/or outlaw anything they want to.