P-lips. There's a reason why it's been around for so long. Vulcanite P-lips on Peterson, I'm happy. Even like fishtail Peterson. I just like Peterson. Who cares how much a pipe is as long as you like it?
I'm enjoying reading everyone's posts above--thanks for chiming in. Food for thought for me.. . . Jack.Howell is a member here and a very highly regarded carver whose pipe sell in the $300 to $450 range. Jack's pipes smoke as good as the best pipes I own and better than most. For someone to maintain a certain $1000 pipe smokes 3 x better than one of Jack's is absurd.
When you pay over a thousand, you're mostly paying for the name IMHO. I'd say aesthetics but I don't find many of those high end Danish pipes very appealing.
I spend a few hours nearly every week with Fred. You couldn't be more correct about most of what he says being tongue in cheek. As evidence, I present for your entertainment, The Hidden Benefits of the Expensive Pipe Tamper by Fred Hanna.Most of what he says is tongue in cheek, but he's spot on about the brand myth.
I feel like I could have a lot of fun talking with him.?I spend a few hours nearly every week with Fred. You couldn't be more correct about most of what he says being tongue in cheek. As evidence, I present for your entertainment, The Hidden Benefits of the Expensive Pipe Tamper by Fred Hanna.
Exactly what I do.Whether I'm spending in the 2 digit range or the 4 digit range, if a pipe is well constructed with quality materials, aesthetics are key for me.
Damn it! I knew there was a reason why using Czech tool made my smoking experience many folds better than using my pipe nail. Live and learn, I guess.I spend a few hours nearly every week with Fred. You couldn't be more correct about most of what he says being tongue in cheek. As evidence, I present for your entertainment, The Hidden Benefits of the Expensive Pipe Tamper by Fred Hanna.
I'm not sure that I remember much of that from Fred's writing. There was a serious argument between him and other members, in The Pipe Collector regarding his articles (10 years ago?) regarding his articles.Fred's writing often poked fun at itself.
Likely do to them taking pipes far too seriously.I'm not sure that I remember much of that from Fred's writing. There was a serious argument between him and other members, in The Pipe Collector regarding his articles (10 years ago?) regarding his articles.
He wrote a pretty strong retort/reply regarding his grain article, I think that I'm remembering that era/topic.Likely do to them taking pipes far too seriously.
You're both right. Fred has a terrific sense of humor and his favorite target is himself. A lot of fun to be around. But get in a serious discussion, buckle up for real debate.I'm not sure that I remember much of that from Fred's writing. There was a serious argument between him and other members, in The Pipe Collector regarding his articles (10 years ago?) regarding his articles.
The moral is, high price doesn't always mean better.
Come along now, it's time for your medication....What, exactly, is an "expensive" pipe?
I have (at last count) over five trillion dollars (yes, Jeffy says he's #1, but that's just to take the heat and focus off me), and I gave away a 600 foot mega luxo super yacht to a friend last week because I'd found its color tedious.
To me, 747's aren't "expensive." 100 story skyscrapers aren't "expensive". Hell, medium-sized countries aren't "expensive."
I think that the matter of "expensive" pipes is entirely relative.
So, you're saying "you are smoking wood"? LOL!!Just remember - no matter how expensive or inexpensive your briar - you are smoking wood. Doesn’t matter if you smoke a lot of wood…or a little wood….you are smoking wood. Meerschaum, clay and other smoking materials instantly become more popular when you think about it. Because, you are no longer smoking wood. And - when done smoking wood - you get some ash. ?
Buy what you like, like what you buy, smoke what you like, like what you smoke. The rest is optional.
You're listing Fred Hanna as a defining source of accurate information?
Most of what he says is tongue in cheek, but he's spot on about the brand myth.