Thanks for asking. I was wondering the same thing.Won at what.
Thanks for asking. I was wondering the same thing.Won at what.
Quite right Embers. ?That's not the only reason for sandblasting.
Yes, it's easy to understand this. But in the very early days, Dunhill's only had two finishes. Smooth in Bruyere & blasts called Shell Briar. The briar for the blasts were selected because they were thought to give better grain patterns after blasting.Well the first sandblast dunhills that was the reason I should have said
I would agree with you Mike, it certainly holds true with newer pipes, DR & Flame Grains, way more expensive than blasts and anything else for that matter.I still think in my humble opinion a smooth dunhill should be more valuable than a sandblasted dunhill. But it shows time and time again that I am wrong. That’s why I asked in the first place. My intention isn’t to say smooth is better than sandblast.
Yes and the ruby sandblast I think are really nice.Yes, it's easy to understand this. But in the very early days, Dunhill's only had two finishes. Smooth in Bruyere & blasts called Shell Briar. The briar for the blasts were selected because they were thought to give better grain patterns after blasting.
I for one prefer the blasted finishes, especially so the Ring Grains.
I believe the rusticated Peterson’s are their very flawed briars now. Same with savinellis. But as I said the most beautiful pipe I’ve ever seen was a rusticated upshall.I would agree with you Mike, it certainly holds true with newer pipes, DR & Flame Grains, way more expensive than blasts and anything else for that matter.
I have a Dunhill's 120, that suits blasting very well. There appears to have been a knot in the briar. Now not a flaw per se, but it would not be suitable for straight grain, however give it a sand blast and "Hey Presto!" you've got an interesting blast grain pattern. At least I think it is.
Don't confuse rusticated with sand blasting. Not wanting to come across as patronizing.I believe the rusticated Peterson’s are their very flawed briars now. Same with savinellis. But as I said the most beautiful pipe I’ve ever seen was a rusticated upshall.
Answering the original question.Thanks for asking. I was wondering the same thing.
That’s really nice. Did you say earlier you have 120 dunhills? Holy cow. I bet some have great story’s they could tellI should add, best sand blast of a Dunhill's pipe.
What do you think of the opera shape? I’ve considered buying both a sandblasted one and a smooth. But I just don’t know what to think of the shapeI should add, best sand blast of a Dunhill's pipe.
I don't own 120 Dunhill's. I don't own 120 pipes.That’s really nice. Did you say earlier you have 120 dunhills? Holy cow. I bet some have great story’s they could tell
It's not on my radar. I haven't really considered it.What do you think of the opera shape? I’ve considered buying both a sandblasted one and a smooth. But I just don’t know what to think of the shape
The price was right that’s why I considered it. But the shape just wasn’t doing anything for me. I was curious what you thoughtIt's not on my radar. I haven't really considered it.
There was one posted on the forum just lately, but don't remember if it was for sale, or just show & tell
Oh. Ha! Shape 120. Sorry. I was thinking holy cow. I don’t own even twenty pipes. Sorry for the confusionI don't own 120 Dunhill's. I don't own 120 pipes.
But I do own two Dunhill's shape 120.
I bought one from a member on here, really pleased with it. Smokes great too. It's a 1961.
And I just bought a NOS from 1967, so being NOS never smoked. Actually, it was from a private collection, but never smoked. Haven't received it yet.
No apologies needed. ?Oh. Ha! Shape 120. Sorry. I was thinking holy cow. I don’t own even twenty pipes. Sorry for the confusion