I'll cut to the chase. The London Times this year published that Richemont sold some of its BAT holdings to Remgro and still holds a controling interest of 18.2%. Remgro's primary shareholder is the Rupert family. Guess who is the primary shareholder of Richemont? Bingo! It is the Rupert family.
The sale of some of BAT was in response to requests from other shareholders to improve share value. Shares are now out performing the shares of peers. 3.7 billions of Euros went from one company to the other for a less than a .6% share of BAT. Certainly not the huge block of stock they owned years ago.
Between the two Rupert controlled companies they own 18%+ of BAT. That 18% is apparently enough to be a controlling interest. So, Richemont and Remgro, therefore the Rupert family controls everything Dunhill, tobaccos, luggage, ties, etc.
At least that's what my research indicates today. I'll keep an eye on it until my interest in the discussion wanes.
The sale of some of BAT was in response to requests from other shareholders to improve share value. Shares are now out performing the shares of peers. 3.7 billions of Euros went from one company to the other for a less than a .6% share of BAT. Certainly not the huge block of stock they owned years ago.
Between the two Rupert controlled companies they own 18%+ of BAT. That 18% is apparently enough to be a controlling interest. So, Richemont and Remgro, therefore the Rupert family controls everything Dunhill, tobaccos, luggage, ties, etc.
At least that's what my research indicates today. I'll keep an eye on it until my interest in the discussion wanes.