Not true.Agreed; mouth cancer, throat cancer, sinus cancer, COPD, heart disease... but of course it all starts with a predisposition to cancer or these illnesses to begin with.
Not true.Agreed; mouth cancer, throat cancer, sinus cancer, COPD, heart disease... but of course it all starts with a predisposition to cancer or these illnesses to begin with.
One man's psychologist is another man's proctologist.What one pays a psychiatrist to do with rubber duckies should be kept stumm... what happens on the couch, stays on the couch.
Quite true. Some can spend their entire lives exposed to certain carcinogenic substances and never develop cancer.Not true.
Or in the bath!What one pays a psychiatrist to do with rubber duckies should be kept stumm... what happens on the couch, stays on the couch.
Oh, she knows I smoke in the bath. The hot tub too. Perfect times to smoke.Or in the bath!
I’m not really sure what part you say isn’t true.Not true.
It does not start with a predisposition to cancer.I’m not really sure what part you say isn’t true.
You're not wrong.Perfect times to smoke.
I wouldn't rely on this. How do you know what group you fall in. I ride a 1000 pound motorcycle. I know the risks and elect to ride my bike. There are unknowns that I can't control. I elect to smoke a pipe for many of the same reasons.Quite true. Some can spend their entire lives exposed to certain carcinogenic substances and never develop cancer.
Are you going to elaborate, or just keep throwing short sentences without explanations. Hell, maybe I am wrong, but just saying so isn’t going to change my mind. Some valid links would help, also.It does not start with a predisposition to cancer.
I've known nonsmokers who've gotten lung cancer as well as those that have smoked for 50+ years without ever developing it. It's just genes and luck of the draw. If you're thinking that pipe smoking is any healthier than other tobacco use, you shouldn't rely on that either.I wouldn't rely on this.
Where is your evidence based medicine?I've known nonsmokers who've gotten lung cancer as well as those that have smoked for 50+ years without ever developing it. It's just genes and luck of the draw. If you're thinking that pipe smoking is any healthier than other tobacco use, you shouldn't rely on that either.
Where is yours? You the one throwing “your wrongs” at us.Where is your evidence based medicine?
Where's yours? It's from personal experience with those that have or have not had it based on their life choices. The past few years have really lost my faith in accepted science and medicine so go push the virtue signaling elsewhere.Where is your evidence based medicine?
Obviously you are entitled to your opinion. So am I.Where's yours? It's from personal experience with those that have or have not had it based on their life choices. The past few years have really lost my faith in accepted science and medicine so go push the virtue signaling elsewhere.
The published medical journals.Where's yours? It's from personal experience with those that have or have not had it based on their life choices. The past few years have really lost my faith in accepted science and medicine so go push the virtue signaling elsewhere.
Why do you think they even screen for genetic risks for cancer? If it isn’t a factor, then they’re wasting my time and money. Why do some smokers live and smoke heavily for long lives while infants die of cancer?The published medical journals.
SameMine is just based on long conversations with my doctor.