One good thing that might come out of all this regulation and forbidden on line sales is the Bricks & mortar shops might see something of a resurgence and they might be a bit more of common site in towns & cities like it was some years ago
I seriously doubt it. B&M's are under attack as well from ever more onerous regulation, and as businesses with a physical storefront they are an easier target. Just take a look at the latest Canadian anti-tobacco BS, courtesy of the liberal gov't and their supporting interest groups:
tobacco plain packaging; please read the news story linked to in my first post, which includes the local tobacconist's concern that with Canada being such a small market, many producers won't bother or be able to afford producing special packaging for a single market. You can see something there akin to European governments complaining about tins with Danish (foreign) labels.
There are also worldwide organisations/power groups, notable among them the World Health Organization [sic] with its
infamous Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which are trying to shut down not just tobacco consumption but also production by
promoting pushing the banning of tobacco cultivation. Old Ceylon is a good example:
Sri-Lanka to be tobacco-free. Note how these policies are first enacted on small/poor countries which are easier to manipulate through tit-for-tat 'aid' grants.
The same malignant WHO is also responsible for the issue we're discussing here: see their
Protocol to Elliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products:
The Protocol contains provisions which require a ratifying state to take a variety of measures regarding the tobacco trade, including licensing; tracking and tracing; record-keeping; monitoring and regulating sales by Internet; international transit; and duty-free sales. The Protocol also promotes international co-operation in information sharing, mutual legal assistance, and extradition of persons suspected of involvement in the illicit tobacco trade.
Sure, the document reads 'illicit', which is misleading as it makes people think of rugged, mean, criminalistic smugglers; but with tobacco continuously being vilified, over-regulated, and banned, it's not difficult for a thinking person to see that they already consider any kind of tobacco illicit, even before it's declared so.
At length, the whole thing is heading into prohibition. Even if they remember what happened when they tried to ban alcohol, the governments and power groups feel now more cocky due to the ease to track purchases and purchasers by means of digital means that didn't exist 100 years ago, when they banned alcohol. Digital tracks paired with ever more sophisticated means of panopticon-like surveilance (drones, street cameras, nosy neighbours 'doing their civic duty' by ratting you out, &c.) give those in power the confidence that they will have little trouble in enforcing prohibition.