Also, inheritance shouldn't be a thing to look down on but a thing that should be aspired to IMO.
Also, inheritance shouldn't be a thing to look down on but a thing that should be aspired to IMO.
McClelland also had to change blue mountain to Balkan blue for a simular reasonI just remembered that this issue with naming a blend after a LOTR blend isn't that unique.
Who remembers the SPC blend Pike Place? They had to take it off the market and stop using the name after getting sued by the owners of the Pike Place Market in Seattle.
Oh you just pissed off the entire Instagram Bearded Men of Manliness contingent, the JRRT nerds, and the pipe bears all in one fell swoop.Suckers fall for the name all the time, power of suggestion. Take for instance the Vanilla Cherry aromatic called Hobbit's Weed. *I used to watch bearded, aro hating, manly men, smoking that goopy vanilla cherry shit in the lounge all the time. But, change the name of that blend to Tranny in a Tutu, and I will guarantee you that same guy won't smoke it. All of those LOTR blends... someone just put the name on something, and the smoker's imagination makes the connection. Hell, the imaginary story takes place somewhere else besides our reality. What they call tobacco could be lemon grass or freaking basil for all we know.
I found that blend a bit nutty, yet approachable.
Bruce Lee’s heirs own that, but only on St. Patrick’s Day.Are they just having to rename the middle-earth series, as "Middle-Earth" is copyrighted? Surely the JRRT estate hasn't copyrighted "green dragon" and such.
not only that but with an IP a product can appear to be sanctioned or official by using a name. Which can damage the IP in a way.As someone who produces IP for a living, and relies on the protections afforded by copyright law to make that living, I wholeheartedly and vociferously disagree with you. Squatting on, and deriving benefits from someone else’s labor is theft. And pretty slimey theft at that. If these tobacco blends were so wonderful, they would sell just fine with names like “Number One” or “I Like It”. They wouldn’t need to lean on someone else’s creative talent to sell them.
they're pretty much protected under satire. Which is really extra important in part because if it wasn't the legal system could easily be abused to attack bad reviews including those of political figures. Law is fun when you don't have to deal with the wrong end of it.
Those are some good names. I especially like"Trumeteer". On this same subject, how does MM get away with having "Shire" names, "Elf Cobbit", "Dwarf, etc. Or do they maybe pay royalties. I don't know how this stuff works.IIRC, in the Letters of Tolkien, somewhere, he discusses with the publishers that they missed the boat on copyright in England so when the American version of the books were to be published they copyrighted everything. What upset Tolkien is a pre-version of fan fiction where people in England and Europe were writing and publishing their own stories using his characters and place names and they were writing what he considered garbage and making money. Now fan fiction is a huge internet business.
I would think the names would be easy to change and still keep their customer base.
Green Dragon - Envious Drake
Old Toby (Tobias Hornblower) - Trumpeteer
Second breakfast - Brunch
Kingsfoil - Royal Flower
etc., etc.
Cobbit might fall under the satire/parody clause. I think the terms elf and dwarf are public domain.Those are some good names. I especially like"Trumeteer". On this same subject, how does MM get away with having "Shire" names, "Elf Cobbit", "Dwarf, etc. Or do they maybe pay royalties. I don't know how this stuff works.
Yeah, that makes sense.Cobbit might fall under the satire/parody clause. I think the terms elf and dwarf are public domain.
Companies could easily buy a license from the estate to make it legal and contractual. But I bet its awfully expensive and may be cost prohibitive.Those are some good names. I especially like"Trumeteer". On this same subject, how does MM get away with having "Shire" names, "Elf Cobbit", "Dwarf, etc. Or do they maybe pay royalties. I don't know how this stuff works.
Dwarf is not in the LOTR books. Tolkien was a philologist and explained that the plrual of Dwarve was Dwarves not Dwarf and Dwarfs and despised those words as incorrect. He insisted it that Dwarve not be corrected to Dwarf or Dwarfs because it was wrong.Cobbit might fall under the satire/parody clause. I think the terms elf and dwarf are public domain.
Thanks! I knew about the Dwarves but always thought the singular was Dwarf. Fool of an AroEnglish!Dwarf is not in the LOTR books. Tolkien was a philologist and explained that the plrual of Dwarve was Dwarves not Dwarf and Dwarfs and despised those words as incorrect. He insisted it that Dwarve not be corrected to Dwarf or Dwarfs because it was wrong.
Bowl of DoomShortbutt Leaf
Young Tommy
Pauper Saran
Dwarf is not in the LOTR books. Tolkien was a philologist and explained that the plrual of Dwarve was Dwarves not Dwarf and Dwarfs and despised those words as incorrect. He insisted it that Dwarve not be corrected to Dwarf or Dwarfs because it was wrong.