The only difference is the label. Still made in the same facility by the same people using the same tins, components and recipes.
Those same ones tended to be heavy users of narcotics and hallucinogens, were prone to deviance and spouse abuse, and aren't/weren't people that I would aspire to praise or emulate.
Not sure you have in mind. I was thinking people like Twain, Einstein, Lewis and Tolkien. In any case I'm not endorsing everything somebody did just because I understand why they felt pipes were an important aid in their process
Pure Awesomeness!In keeping with the thrust of this thread, in a posting for this forum, it is obviously important to stick to the terms used in smoking and pipes, and to use obscurantism wherever possible. The purpose of this is to prevent one's posting from being read and misinterpreted by ignorant outsiders, and perhaps to discourage an over-inquisitive interest shown by an expert rival. By the time one has reached the higher echelons of nonscience, as a fully qualified expert, obscurantism is instinctive. As a reflex, almost, one would say.
We have accomplished this manoeuvre by the expedient of utilising manually induced frictional heating on topographical substrate high-spots inducing a consequent oxidative/heating effect in the adjacent chemical microenvironment with inherent self-propagating proclivities, and leading inevitably to the initiation of the oxidative process, in a self-sustaining mode, of the contained cellular lignin core.
Reich is a wild child , learned about cloudbusting from him and it turned me on to theosophy what a strange world indeed.
We have a pilgrimage to the Reich Museum planned, it's not too far. I know little of the guy or his work, been on the radar but haven't zoned in on it yet. The home of the Wilhelm Reich Museum in Rangeley, Maine - https://wilhelmreichmuseum.org/ Love Kate Bush and her killer quirky style, here's her cool story on Reich and Cloudbusting--pipes of a different kind: The story behind Kate Bush’s Cloudbusting video - https://www.dazeddigital.com/music/article/27217/1/the-story-behind-kate-bush-s-cloudbusting-video
I'm aware, A great book of his is The Mass Psychology Of Fascism, published in 1933 where he pretty much foresaw it all, predating what happened on the last day of June 1934. And as history repeats itself here we go again
I'll add it to the pile and yes, there is a lot that seems familiar. Next week--USAID's launch of global ready Diia via WEF playground zero, UKR-- the digital jackboots crest the horizon...I'm aware, A great book of his is The Mass Psychology Of Fascism, published in 1933 where he pretty much foresaw it all, predating what happened on the last day of June 1934. And as history repeats itself here we go again
“Do we choose to be born, or are we fitted to the times we’re born into?” Abraham Lincoln was a nobody that few knew of, but look at the massive influence this “nobody” brought to America and the world. Was Mr. Peterson (a relative nobody) fitted to the times he was born into? Follow the cause to his fame (or to some, infamy) and decide for yourself. In any event, the world today is not lessened because of his presence, just as the world in Lincoln’s time was not lessened by his (though many people think it was, and still do).
Before you judge Kingsley or Catafalque, it needs to be read. There is so much of that going on today, a headline, a snippet passes for due diligence, far too many free-flowing opinions, on too many subjects, with little real knowledge of the material.
. Sure there are some mechanics of mind but most is much further reaching. I find nothing at all ridiculous about looking at Jung as a modern prophet of sorts. It's the deification of human reason/intellect that rebels against the notion. We are infants in terms of our conscious awareness of what we are. It's absurd to think we have anywhere near the full story regarding the nature of the human psyche. It is my understanding that the argument that religion can be "re-binding" may not be correct. Religio in latin means "conscientiousness, sense of right, moral obligation, duty
I love Jung's work and never got the impression he was necessarily anti-religion per se, at least in the dozen books I read by him. My takeaway was that he saw religion as something intrinsic in the human condition. For example, in his Religion and Western Psychology work, he argued that Catholic mass results in a more mentally balanced individual and that protestant pastors needed more psychological training to offset the lack of the mass experience. His father was a Swiss protestant pastor so Jung comes from a very religious household. While they did reject Catholicism, they also didn't feel bound to limit themselves to particular religious texts and that means he can bring in some interesting perspectives.
Oops! It's "ligare" not "ligio" that I was thinking of. They probably mean the same thing ultimately (although not being a Latin connoisseur, I can't say this for sure), due to the "lig" part--ligament is the first word that pops into my mind to evidence this.
I've always looked bemusedly upon the justification religions offer up when it comes to the alteration of the Scripture (which, coincidentally, is forbidden in Deuteronomy!). Growing up Jewish certainly gave me an interesting perspective on this, because Judaism is notorious for adding stuff, whereas Christianity and Catholicism both seem to favor the other route and remove things. The trinity thing is an exception--that one was fairly easy to force into the Christological formation in the first few centuries AD, chiefly because, in our societies, the people have to be all three in order for our society (and legal system) to work--the Creator, the Created, and the Giver of life. I don't know if Jung knew of exactly how human societies counterfeit God's system of government (supplanting it with our own), but he certainly knew enough to avoid some of the pitfalls that come about through leaving this "human condition" unchecked.
Well it's clear in the sense that the "lig" part has to do with a bond or a connection to something, but it's also unclear because words are always changing (often with insidious intentions behind it), and that unfortunately does muddle people's ability to understand and communicate ideas. As I mentioned, the scant presence of the word throughout the Scripture indicates that the connection between religion and theism is not at all the case. The connection is to deism, not theism...the belief in a god, as opposed to The God. Big difference!
No, wait, more bed of nails...we haven't arrived at the argo, art gothic, agotique, argot, and archtectonic, the facade, the thing that stands for something else only hinted at-- the phonetic cabala of words!! Ligion sounds like Legion-- many, a group, we've previously covered re, to do again re-member as opposed to dismember. Re-group... It's mind boggling what people can parse together out of crumbs. Religion is the chemical coniunctio not the Alchemical Coniunctio! The materialist's premature version of re-unification, a penny side show perhaps? Sorry, that may have hurt me more than you, but someone had to say it
