Relevant only to a point made by another (that wasn't relevant to the post he replied to.)
Not just relevant to the Big Picture, but
IS the Big Picture... The fundamental reason why women's sports (like basketball) only generate a fraction of the interest---and therefore revenue---that men's sports do.
People in general can be made to care about abstract things only in the case of extremes.
You might not give the slightest damn about rodeo bull riding, but you'll spend the minute it takes to see some previously unridden monster bull who bucked off 562 cowboys in a row finally get ridden successfully.
You might not care about archery, but if some guy managed to stack five arrows into each other at a tournament somewhere and it was caught on film, you'd probably watch it.
Ditto the highest pole vault ever made, the farthest baseball home run ever hit, the fastest quick draw ever recorded, and on and on.
The vast number of athletes "beneath" those Best Ever accomplishments don't move the needle in the mind of the general public, though.
And female athletics (in all but a handful of cases, such as distance swimming) translates into the best that women can do is nowhere near the best a sport can be played, or an event task accomplished. That's the domain of men (courtesy of Mother Nature).
Result? Disinterest in women's sports at a subconscious level. The fat part of the bell curve of potential observers simply don't care. Only devoted fans and enthusiasts do.