The first capsule Boeing had NASA review had 80 major design flaws. I love that they got to a point where they built something that was so bad. They had to completely scrap it and start over. What the hell is going on with that company promote up not out.Boeing and Disney should merge. They both seem to share the same philosophy regarding product quality.
The actual underlying problem was a lack of redundancy in a flight critical system. Touching the air data system to provide the necessary redundancy would’ve touched many, many other systems. Touching them results in the possibility that they would have to be redesigned to comply with the latest regulatory basis, or at the very least an enormous amount of test and analysis. It was a management decision to avoid cost abetted by the FAA Northwest cert office.This is what happens when you have your software done "offshore" by the cheapest company you can find, same with the Max software that ended up killing hundreds of people.
Man that's cool
I’m sorry.They got in the usual way. They got hired.
You need to dispel from your mind the myth that people get hired because they are competent or deserving. Sometimes that is the case, but sometimes it’s enough that they give the appearance of competence.
The secret is simple. If you can’t dazzle with brilliance, baffle with bullshit.
Some of the most desperately dumb, spectacularly stupid bozos it has been my displeasure to deal with populate HR departments. And leave us not forget the old boys network, old school ties, nincompoop nepotism, and an unholy host of cons, falsified resumes, and on and on. It’s a wonder that we’re not wiped off the face of the planet. But just give it time.
I grew up in satellite beach, everyone either worked for NASA or was in the Air Force, we were here for all of the original launches, Mercury program, etc., i was too young but my brothers and sister all got to watch the Apollo launches from right down the road, I’ve been here for almost all of the shuttles and space x, it’s in the blood. I have two friends that I grew up with that are both directors of different divisions at NASA so I do get some pretty good free passes and launch viewing passes things like that. And I got to meet Buzz Aldrin at someone’s house even though he wouldn’t sign an autograph lolMan that's cool
Indeed, NASA was the result of a strong Affirmative Action/Diversity Equity and Inclusion program of its day, to wit, to increase the number of then under-represented but nonetheless highly competent Nazis. See Operation Paperclip: Operation Paperclip - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_PaperclipI have no issue with diversity as long as it doesn’t supersede competence. Talent is where you find it.
Why limit this to these two?I’m sorry.
Are we talking about Scandinavian Tobacco Group here, or Boeing?
Quoting Tom Lehrer, "Nazi, schmazi, says Werner Von Braun".Indeed, NASA was the result of a strong Affirmative Action/Diversity Equity and Inclusion program of its day, to wit, to increase the number of then under-represented but nonetheless highly competent Nazis. See Operation Paperclip: Operation Paperclip - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
Well, I thought the same thing.I can't read this title without changing it to "Boing Boing Boing" in my mind. Does this mean I'm weird?
The spiral design theory, they launch vehicles and test them, if they blow up great they learn what they need to change, they spend about 90% less time in simulators and ground fires than typically are done, this allows them much more rapid design changes. They have 4 more test flights planned for this year alone.Watching the starship today was incredible! It would take NASA/Boeing years to turn around a test launch where SpaceX is doing it in months. It’s gotta have something to do with a fresh, diverse workforce vs shuttle era retreads.