Blend(s) you will hate losing the most?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 27, 2016
1,280
127
What's the story with Stokkebye PS-84 Turkish Export bulk in its current form? It's not clear to me if that is safe or not.

 

jmatt

Part of the Furniture Now
Aug 25, 2014
770
75
This doesn't make much sense. It is still called McCranie's Red Ribbon, and it still contains the same type of tobacco ingredients, just a different crop. This is no different than any other blend that uses different crops to achieve roughly the same product.

Sorry - lost track of this thread for a day. You're right. It makes no sense. But if you read all of the FDA's guidance, each year of Christmas Cheer is a new product needing new approval. Or at a minimum submitting an application to determine "substantial equivalence." But reading their guidance, even different tin art has made products NOT substantially equivalent and require full testing as a new product. And it's ridiculous. It's like saying a 2015 Mondavi Cabernet is different from a 2016 Mondavi Cabernet. Of course they're different. It's a product made from a crop, and each year a new crop grows. Duh. Or like sweet corn. I love sweet corn, but there's definitely a difference from field to field. Occasionally you find that sweet corn that's just perfect this year. What McCranies/McClelland do is basically say each year "of all the fields worth of virginia tobacco - this was the best of the best this year." Just like finding good corn or good wine. But in the FDA's wisdom, that is now all regulated and impermissible without a process that will cost more than the total sales volume of the product each year.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.