ThisI think the galling part is not the shape but the entire package - color schemes, nomenclature, etc.
ThisI think the galling part is not the shape but the entire package - color schemes, nomenclature, etc.
This isn’t a vendor related issue. No one is forced to respond. Is the key to the gate here really heavy?Russ used to personally oversee shipping, and made reforms. He would actually personally check on orders for folks also. But then, when complaints got irrational and insults started, I think he dialed back how much he was willing to bend over backwards for folks.
We probably want to watch how many times we try to drag SP.com administration into discussions on here, or else they will start top feel taken advantage of. Someone could have emailed him first. It's not really fair to publicly put these guys on the spot for every iota and notion for a post that crosses a forum member's mind.
Just saying... we don't wanna squeeze the Goose too often.
It’s not the shapes you aren’t even understanding the discussion here.I wasn't admonishing you for tagging folks, just posting it for everyone. Yes, I tagged Russ, but he hasn't really responded to tags lately. And, I don't blame him.
I think that discussing it is a great post. My experiences with people claiming that their jewelry designs were stolen usually don't pan out. You almost have to have access top their files to prove these things. I've had several of my designs reproduced by these catalog jewelry companies, but enforcing copyright for a sculptural design like jewelry or a pipe shape is almost impossible. It's the logo and trademarks that are more easily protected.
But, ultimately, I would wonder why a Peterson shape would be any more outrageous to assimilate than a Dunhill shape or an Eltang.
It says they're made in Italy in the description. I personally think it's part of a friendly-ish war between SP and P&C that's becoming less friendly.Yeh, the weird part is that the factory run Petes are already cheap as shit, IMO. It is like counterfeiting cheap Czech tools. Doesn't make sense to me. I would not be surprised if these turned out to come out of the Peterson factory. But, I also wouldn't be surprised if they came out of Poland or some other Eastern European company.
Exact. An unsuspecting and uninformed person could easily just click buy thinking it’s a Peterson.I think the galling part is not the shape but the entire package - color schemes, nomenclature, etc.
I thought it was pretty ballsy for such a major E-tailer to be this tacky...I'd be surprised if these are knock-offs. That wouldn't be ballsy, just tacky.
Well, not this one.I thought it was pretty ballsy for such a major E-tailer to be this tacky...
What if I made a car called the Henry F. Taurus. But it didn’t look exactly like a Ford Taurus?Not being a Peterson fan but having a few in my racks, I bet these "knock offs" are probably just as good as the originals.
Like Cosmic said, it's nearly impossible to lay claim to a design whether it be a pipe or jewelry. If you could sue for design, Sixten Ivarsson would have died a very, very, rich man. The same could be said about several other pioneering pipe makers.
What I want to know is why they decided to make an entire line to come after the Peterson line? In the Automotive Industry that would be like making knock offs of Kia's. Why bother? Couldn't they have set their sights a bit higher?
In either case, I don't think they will take much, if any business from Peterson.
Taurus SHO'nuffWhat if I made a car called the Henry F. Taurus. But it didn’t look exactly like a Ford Taurus?
See, by not making it EXACTLY like a Taurus, it would be called innovation not imitation.But it didn’t look exactly like a Ford Taurus?
I’d be willing to bet Ford may not see it that way.See, by not making it EXACTLY like a Taurus, it would be called innovation not imitation.
You have been on a car lot, right? They all look about the same to me. Since the 80's I can barely tell one car brand from another if it weren't for the logos.I’d be willing to bet Ford may not see it that way.
As is any conversation about tobacco pipes, if you're inclined to think that way about it. But this is PipesMagazine.com's Pipe Talk forum, so here we are.Much ado about nuthin...
If you don't think it's worth discussing, I'm sure there's a thread discussing dead celebrities, or fishing, or eating camels or something more interesting to you somewhere.
I took "much ado about nothing" to mean discussing these pipes is making a big fuss over something insignificant.So what’s you’re point...?
I was discussing it.
If I don’t share your opinion, I should piss off...? Is that it?
Where is that quote from? Is it from the P&C website?I decided to go have a look at these pipes. This particular model and accompanying description are something else.
"Erin Go Bragh Tirim pipes will seem very familiar to you at first glance, but these aren't anything like the cheap knockoffs with shank caps that would fall off and stems that would break. Tirim pipes are smooth briars that are finished in a warm walnut tone with a lustrous finish. The shank has a bright metal cap that is fully integrated so it's made to last. The stem has the recognizable fluted shape you would expect, but it's made with incredibly durable and brilliant ebony acrylic and uses the more comfortable fishtail bit. Finally, instead of using a reservoir to deliver a dry smoke, Erin Go Bragh Tirim pipes use a 9mm charcoal filter to reduce excess moisture and cool the smoke. Best of all, you'll save a lot with these pipes vs. similar briars."
View attachment 73002