The biggest issue in my mind is how the descriptors have come to be used. We have seen through many of the posts here that what some might consider an aromatic, many would never have labeled that way.
It would be nice to have some authority in the industry actually make a classification system that makes sense. I never thought of Royal Yacht, University Flake, Warrior Plug, etc. as aromatics. Many did without hesitation, and after some thought, I guess it makes sense. But, we all know they do not fall in the same category as 1Q or Captain Black. I think if the question was posed to many "Which of the two tobaccos is aromatic, Captain Black or Royal Yacht", most people would pick CB right off the bat.
It would be nice though, to have better categories that are more descriptive of what the tobacco really is. It's not going to happen, not that I can see.
It would be nice to have some authority in the industry actually make a classification system that makes sense. I never thought of Royal Yacht, University Flake, Warrior Plug, etc. as aromatics. Many did without hesitation, and after some thought, I guess it makes sense. But, we all know they do not fall in the same category as 1Q or Captain Black. I think if the question was posed to many "Which of the two tobaccos is aromatic, Captain Black or Royal Yacht", most people would pick CB right off the bat.
It would be nice though, to have better categories that are more descriptive of what the tobacco really is. It's not going to happen, not that I can see.