Anybody Seen This Dunhill Freehand Before??????

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

178 Fresh Peterson Pipes
29 Fresh Eltang Basic Pipes
46 Fresh Estate Pipes
10 Fresh Mastro Geppetto Pipes
36 Fresh Rossi Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

mso489

Lifer
Feb 21, 2013
41,211
60,649
I'm not a Dunhill guy, so this pipe might have easily escaped my attention, but it certainly looks like a departure from the Dunhill design book. The stem, the ferrule, the freehand concept, it all looks most un-Dunhill to me. I'll be interesting to hear what the Dunhill scholars have to say. This looks like Dunhill by Mummert to me. Bad joke.
 

lightmybriar

Lifer
Mar 11, 2014
1,315
1,842
I’m a resident Dunhill fan haha and I think that’s a pretty cool pipe. I do go to the Danes for freehands in general, but yes, Dunhill had a few freehand adventures every now and then. And yes, if the date code is 24, that’d be a 1984.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BROBS

hauntedmyst

Lifer
Feb 1, 2010
4,012
20,787
Chicago
I have a hard time seeing Dunhill adding their Acrylic ferrule. I would not be surprised if the pipe wasn't originally something like what Brobs posted and was damaged and then repaired and that was installed.
 
  • Love
Reactions: anotherbob

lightmybriar

Lifer
Mar 11, 2014
1,315
1,842
Nice pipe but Izvestia to question why a company who defines traditional pipe shapes would venture into that arena.
Dunhill covers the classics for sure, but let’s not forget the windshield pipe, or their Christmas pipes with themes, or their Dalmatian pipe, etc. They do explore all sorts of avenues in addition to keeping with the classics!
 

ohfatty

Lurker
Dec 1, 2019
48
55
Initially, I thought the ferrule was added, however there is zero evidence of any crack and nomenclature appears to be in a standard location. . However, the original owner may have not liked the length and the ferrule added as an extension. Or it could be the result of a wacky Brit at the Dunhill lab. That is the main reason I posted this, was to see if anyone has seen a duplicate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.