Urs Portmann Swiss Tobaccos

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

karam

Lifer
Feb 2, 2019
2,710
10,253
Basel, Switzerland
Morning! Here's me writing after a long while, this time about some house mixtures from a Swiss tobacconist called Urs Portmann. I've visited the B&M shop in Konstanz - beautiful town shared between Switzerland and Germany, you can literally hop over the border, it's just a line on the street - it's a great tobacco and cigar shop, anyone who finds themselves there should pay a visit. In any case I got these tobaccos based on description on the website alone, so here we go, this thread will get more entries as I smoke through them.

One last thing, I am always curious of some of the tobaccos I've found in B&M shops in Switzerland because while they are always called "house mixture" it's possible to spot the telltale signs of the big manufacturers (e.g., perfect square flakes and roundels scream STG/MacBaren/Kopp - whoever if making these these days, thicker cut, rubbery flakes and Kendal toppings scream Gawith), Portmann used to also carry "house" ropes, I've smoked enough from all over to be able to spot the obvious, plus there are no "house" ropes, only Gawith makes proper ropes.

Portmann No 102
  • Portmann description: Golden Virginia flake, Burley, a pinch of Perique, honey and orange aroma
  • Presentation: stringy long, partly broken, light in colour with brown strands. I don’t get any of the sourness of Perique, but I do get a whiff of orange, honey, and grass
  • Smoke: I was getting vibes of Huber Virginia Golden Flake from the start, turned out to be softer on the orange but a stronger smoke than expected, with less grass than it smelled like, and potentially more Perique too. Progressively the flavour turned stronger, and the Perique more noticeable to the point it was reminding me of stronger VaPers at times. I’d call this a great Virginia blend, not a VaPer (even though it is, according to the description), maybe/probably the Burley is doing some work on the background giving it body it could have been lacking otherwise. I’d probably like a bit more scenting, however there was an underlying sweetness always coming through. It’s not Huber Virginia Golden Flake, but it’s pretty close. Fairly cellar-worthy.
1761290495440.png

Portmann No 115
  • Portmann description: Dark-fired leaf pressed into flakes with tonka bean aroma
  • Presentation: Gawithian broken flake, quite dark and somewhat rubbery, medium-strength tonka bean flavour followed by malty Virginia
  • Smoke: after cube cutting and a little drying the initial blast is of tonka bean, not powerful in terms of nicotine, but smooth in the smoke. Faint smokiness. Mid-bowl most of the tonka becomes an afterthought and the malty, bready and partially grassy Virginia becomes the main taste, intensifying and sweetening as the bowl progresses. It’s a long and cool smoke, the cube cut flake does a Gawith by first turning stone-hard and then slowly burning to fine white ash (hadn’t seen pure white ash in a while). Not particularly strong in nicotine at any point, but smooth and enjoyable. Fairly full taste. Would have liked a bit more tonka but it’s possible these flakes were old (note “crystals” on the flakes). Very cellar-worthy.
1761290525158.jpeg
 

karam

Lifer
Feb 2, 2019
2,710
10,253
Basel, Switzerland
Great post! How close to 1792 Flake is the No 115 would you say? Sounds like a toned-down version.
Reasonably close, in fact 1792 is among my top 5 tobaccos (edit: just noticed your profile pic so I guess you like 1792 too ;)) so I got 115 to see how close they are, but if 1792 is a stick of dynamite then 115 is a firecracker. 1792 is loaded with DFK and perhaps 10X tonka. Edit: the description doesn’t specify what “dark-fired leaf” we’re taking about but I didn’t taste DFK, if it’s there it’s in minuscule amounts, there was a trace of smokiness but not much nic. For me this is a Virginia.

Still it is a great smoke in its own right.
 
Last edited:

karam

Lifer
Feb 2, 2019
2,710
10,253
Basel, Switzerland
Wish I could source it - sounds like a great blend in its own right. Would be a good addition to my rotation.

Edit: Yeah, the profile pic - I figured updating from the Austrian Oaf was long overdue 😅
Maybe you can contact them? I don’t know if they’d send abroad, but you never know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brendan

karam

Lifer
Feb 2, 2019
2,710
10,253
Basel, Switzerland
Update:

Portmann No 116
  • Portmann description: 100% Virginia tobacco finished with coriander and rose oil
  • Presentation: stringy long, partly broken, light in colour, light whiff of rose oil somewhat akin to Dark Flake Scented but similar to 115 above, firecracker vs stick of dynamite.
  • Smoke: this one sadly didn't work for me, there's something in there that gave me tremendous tongue bite which persisted for more than a day. Last time I had tongue bite like that was >5 years ago when I tried to smoke through HU Tillerman (which lists chili among the ingredients). Powered through a bowl and despite it being an objectively good tobacco I doubt I can smoke it.
1761468762987.png

Portmann No 110
  • Portmann description: Virginia, Burley Flake with rum, licorice and vanilla
  • Presentation: brown broken flake, looks like it's well-aged, no obvious smell of the components likely due to its age
  • Smoke: a good smoke but the toppings have largely gone, what remains is a good VaBur with plenty of body, smooth but not outstanding in any way to justify getting a lot of it. I'll happily smoke through it and probably see to source it when it's fresher.
1761469569128.png