Schizophrenic Tobacco Tax Laws
-
Kevin Godbee - May 2, 2011
- 5 min read
By C.R.S. Lyles
Allow me to pose a question: If you were able to sacrifice the few for the many, throw a couple of people under the bus so that the mass majority would be saved, would you do it?
This question has been at the core of the utilitarian conundrum since the discipline’s inception, and yet the mass majority has still failed to see the relevance of the question or how it applies to modern life.
Therefore, allow me also to pose a scenario, a more specific example that has arisen from this age-old philosophical debate: If you were able to update children’s health care, ensure that the programs utilized to help pay medical costs for children in need continued for the next five years, but in exchange you had to increase tobacco taxes and indirectly encourage people to smoke so that the program could be funded, would you sacrifice the health of adult Americans for our country’s children?
In 2007, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was given additional funding via the Senate Budget Resolution’s permit to increase the cigarette tax by between 39-50 cents.
In 2009, SCHIP received even further support with the passage of H.R. 2, which "increases cigarette taxes, the primary source of tobacco tax revenues from 39 cents to $1.00". While, as always, the bill sounds benevolent on the surface, there are still so many red flags that appear when you really think about what this bill has actually done that I’m quite honestly baffled as to the sheer blindness of my fellow countrymen.
Here’s a little run-down on what’s been going on with this issue lately:
- "Last year, Maine’s Democratic gubernatorial candidate, Libby Mitchell, proposed a renegotiation of the state’s liquor sales contract to raise money for higher education."
- "In 2007, the American Academy of Family Physicians urged Congress to raise the federal tobacco tax to fund expansion of SCHIP, so called Medicaid for children."
- "In Maine, a Democratic state legislator, Diane Russell, has even suggested that marijuana should be legalized and taxed, expressly to generate $8.5 million per year in sales tax revenues."
All these examples have been listed as a means to portray what the editor of the Pelican Post states so succinctly in their most recent article pertaining to this issue: "These examples have one common denominator: government makes one group of citizens dependent on the addiction-driven behavior of another group of citizens."
I wish that it could be just tobacco that was facing such extensive tax increases, but given the current climate I fear that it will be all substances that will be used in some way or another to fund these health programs before too long, with tobacco and alcohol leading the charge, of course. But for now, given the context of this publication and the fact that the smoker’s witch-hunt is a far more interesting story, let’s just stick with the tobacco aspect.
One such website has only this aspect in mind especially. NoCigTax.com lists a comprehensive compilation of the many uses and abuses to which tobacco tax money has been put. Here are some of the more ridiculous uses: "broadband-cable networks in Virginia, upgrading public television stations with DVD technology in Nevada, harbor renovation and museum expansion in Alaska, rural economic development in Georgia, tax rebates in several states, and a People’s Trust Fund, which will generate interest income that can be spent at the legislature’s discretion in South Dakota."
I’m sorry, but isn’t the money generated by tobacco sales supposed to be used for funding to help aid the anti-smoking campaigns? Why isn’t this money going to the American Cancer Society? Honestly, I don’t find much of an issue with tobacco tax money being used to fund children’s health care, but at least have the decency to give both sides credence, because the current state of affairs is simply sending contradictory messages with using money garnered from "harmful and addictive substances" to fund frivolous research and states’ pet projects.
In the first article that I wrote for PipesMagazine.com, [Smokers: The Primary Investors In The American Lifestyle] I postulated that, because of the heady increase in taxes and the somewhat meager earnings that non-profit organizations and anti-smoking initiatives earn, smokers are indirectly the biggest financial backers of the American dream. However, in light of this new evidence, I feel I must rephrase my previous assumption: smokers are not the primary investors in the American way of life, but are in fact the primary investors in every facet of American life, including now not only health care initiatives, but something as mundane as updating the quality of state television.
The thing is, quite literally, that legislation directed at taxing tobacco is contradictory at best and downright paradoxical at worst. The government claims that small businesses are the backbone of America, but just recently in Nebraska a 225% increase to the excise taxes on certain tobacco products threatens to harm those very same businesses which they claim to support. Just because they’re selling tobacco and tobacco products does not mean that these businesses deserve any less than the same courtesy that is extended to all other avenues of business, and yet the witch-hunt continues.
These are precarious times in which we live. The fable of the American dream is crumbling under the iniquities of its progenitors, and those who are left amidst the aftermath are the jaded, the cynical, and the skeptics. Smokers are finding themselves more and more aligned with these individuals based on the sheer effort it takes to enjoy something as simple as a smoke without having to fear criticism from passing strangers, unpleasant surprises at the cash register, or obnoxious commercials aired on television which depict everyday smokers as disgusting trolls who repulse everyone around them.
Therefore, I say that it’s high time that smokers get their due: if the money generated from my purchase of a pack of cigarettes inadvertently helps to fund a form of children’s Medicare, I would like a thank you from those passing strangers rather than a disgusted look. If every pull I take on a pipe leads to your state getting better quality television, I want a commercial aired that recognizes the vital role that smokers play in our society. And if I decide to enjoy a cigar, you better believe that I’m going to expect to pay what’s fair when I purchase it rather than feel guilty that I just spent half my paycheck so that the governor of Florida can buy himself a new golf cart.
Carter R. Lyles is a student at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, FL and at the University of Florida in Gainesville. He is a journalism/psychology major, and in addition to his work at Pipes Magazine, he has contributed articles to The Alligator, Thursday Night Magazine, and The Fine Print. |
Written by Kevin Godbee
9 Responses
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 641. Our featured interview tonight is with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl and is featured in our recurring series, “Ask the Tobacco Blender”. However, tonight he will be the interviewee as we learn about how he became a pipe smoker and collector, when he got his first pipe and how he progressed from there. At the top of the show, Brian will have a review of the rare German tobacco blend, Tumblin’ Dice.
I remember the first time I heard someone else say it. “How many pipes do I need? Just one more.” It’s glib, sure, a bit of a joke, but it also rings a bell of truth, at least to me. I certainly have “enough” pipes, but pipes are seductive little things. Just when we think we’re all set, we have enough, another will come along that tempts us beyond any sense of reason. I suppose it’s the same way with any sort of collecting. There’s always another white whale we’re in pursuit of. When we finally track that one down, though, another will almost inevitably breach the surface, taking its place as the new object of our desire, enticing us to change course and set sail once again. But, there’s a potential problem with having a lot of pipes. Maybe. The more pipes we may have, the harder it can be to keep them in rotation. It makes sense. We tend to gravitate towards our current faves, the ones that most appeal to us for whatever reason, and sometimes, maybe they stay in rotation longer than they really should. The side-effect of this, of course, is that another favored pipe might end up too-long forgotten. That’s exactly what happened recently. Exhibit A: The Castello pictured is one that has been long overlooked. It’s a Trademark shape #55. It’s a really nice example of the shape. The red pearlized stem is beautifully done. The wood isn’t really anything special to look at, but it’s evenly covered, without any bald spots. When I look at it, I wonder why it wasn’t done in the more typical dark ruby-red finish that adorns most Trademarks. I’ve seen a great deal of variation amongst the grade over the years, including one really nice bent-bulldog that left the factory with a brown sandblasted finish. (For those who don’t know, Trademark has long been the lowest Castello smooth grade, usually finished in a dark red.) Was this a stamping/grading error, or is there just more leeway in the grade than we’ve come to expect? I might never know. This example is from the early 1970s, maybe even the late 1960s, identified by the upper case Ks in the grade designation. (On Sea Rock and Old Antiquari pipes, the Ks reflect the size, while with the smooth finishes, Trademark, Castello and Collection, the Ks represent the relative grade.) It has been living in a different rack than the one housing the majority of my #55s. I don’t recall why I put it there, but as many of us can relate to, rack space is often at a premium. I stumbled upon it while looking for something completely different. “Oh, you? Why are you there? I remember you smoke pretty well.” Yeah, I sometimes talk to my pipes – one of many quirks, I suppose. I won’t begin to worry until they start talking back. I grabbed it from the rack, dusted it off, and decided to give it a fill with a bowl of a slightly aged VA/perique blend, Telegraph Hill, from 2018. What a delightful smoke! At five years, the tobacco is expressing a lot of the complexities of aged Virginias and the perique adds a delightful fruitiness. When young, the composition is a bit brighter, maybe a little spicier, but time has polished any edges, and amplified the sweeter notes. Like the pipe, I’d forgotten about this blend for quite a while, but one evening in March, after chatting with my good friend Nate, who is quite a fan of it, I decided it might be time to revisit it. I got a couple of fresh ones, and excavated a couple older tins from the library. I normally reach for Fillmore when I want a VA/perique thing because of its boldness and depth, but in revisiting this one, I’m finding something soothing and comfortable about it that I’ve really been enjoying, both young and aged. Sticking with the theme of the forgotten, and as a perhaps interesting tidbit to the photographically inclined, I shot the pictures for this month’s column with my old Nikkor-O 35mm/2.0 mounted on my trusty Nikon Df. The last time I used this lens, it was adapted to one of my Fujifilm bodies, and I didn’t care much for the results, so I put it away and pretty much forgot about it. But, I’ve recently been exploring some of my old kit, deciding what to keep, what to pass along, and this one once again came to my attention, kind of like that old Castello. On the Df, there’s something about its vintage rendering that I find truly appealing. Another forgotten treasure, and just like with that old pipe, it seems that, at least today, everything old is new again. If your collection is on the large side, are there pipes or tobaccos that you’ve all but forgotten, only to come back to them one day to find yourself wondering why? Maybe it’s just another fun dimension to this endlessly fascinating journey.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 640. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Ben Rapaport. Ben has been known internationally as an avid pipe smoker, antique pipe collector, and book author. His first book on pipes was published in 1972, and his latest book – his 10th – is out now in very limited quantities. The distribution has already sold out, but you can still get a copy of “The Wide World of Wood Tobacco Pipes. Two Centuries of Craftsmanship and Creativity” by contacting him directly at ben70gray@gmail.com. At the top of the show we’ll be turning the tables on our recurring Ask the Pipemaker segment. This time, Jeff Gracik will ask the questions, which Brian will answer as a pipe collector, and you can give your answers too.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 639. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Per Billhäll. Per is the owner of Scandinavian Pipes, which is an online retailer of high grade pipes. He started smoking pipes in the 1960s. His first high grade pipe was made by Hans “Former” Nielsen, who is one of the living legends from Denmark. That led to Per becoming a huge pipe and tobacco collector, and show attendee where he became well known. Along with pipe book author Jan Andersson, they started The Pipe Club of Sweden in 1991. Then in 1999, Per started “Scan Pipes”. He is now one of the pipe retailing legends from Sweden. At the top of the show Brian will talk about holiday blends, and other special pipe tobacco blends.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 638. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Fae “The Sassy Pipe Lady” Simmons. Fae is the owner of Tobacco Treasures, which sells new, vintage, & estate pipes, and smoking accessories on Etsy. She has been in business since 2017, and has been surrounded by pipes and tobacco most of her life. Her father and his brother smoked pipes, and so does Fae. Her husband is also a retired tobacconist that worked all over the industry from coast to coast for several different companies in the industry. She has a great story of how her business got started with a great inventory of unsmoked vintage pipes. At the top of the show we will have an Ask the Tobacco Blender segment with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl, which is one of the most popular boutique pipe tobacco companies in the USA.
Ok, so it’s that time of year, as we all know. Family feasts, houses, yards, and big trees festooned with lights and dangling ornaments, just high enough to keep the cats from reaching a paw into the greenery. It’s also the time of year when your pipe-smoking-significant other makes vast hints about a new pipe. That’s to be expected since he or she was a good boy or girl during the year. Yes, ladies smoke pipes, too. Oh, you want an example? Okay, try Actress Greta Garbo, Millicent Fenwick, Mary Frith, and my late grandmother (who died when she was 93) dipped snuff and smoked a cob occasionally. So now that we have settled that the gentler side of life will puff a pipe too, let’s move on to the upcoming biggest holiday of all. Of course, that huge event is brought to us by the hefty fellow in a red suit, puffing his pipe all the way in a sled filled with presents, being led by a reindeer with a red nose. Or some such. That’s Santa Claus, of course. Becoming a bit more serious, Christmas is such a wonderful time for families and friends. It’s also quite special for pipe puffers. For many of us, this brings up a nostalgic look back to our pipe-smoking or cigar-smoking friends who have died during the current year. A great journalist pal whom I often joined in a local brick-and-mortar pipe and cigar shop. I puffed my pipe, and occasional cigar, as he enjoyed a cigar. He died in October and will be missed. On the happier side of things, Christmas is also a time when mind workers of the world renew their collections with fresh additions. Pundit included. A French passion has overtaken Pundit, from reading more Albert Camus, a heavy cigarette smoker, as were many French intellectuals of a certain time. Instead of cigarettes many of us prefer the more relaxed enjoyment of pipes for that “calm and objective judgment” in the comings and goings of the world. This brings me to French pipes. While visiting France once in the long ago, I happened by a “Tabac” shop in Paris, Tabac Des Vosges. I purchased a beauty of a Chacom bent. I also later bought a Ropp made from ancient briar. To learn more about the dawn of briar pipes and beginnings, take a peek at a well-done piece by Davin Hylton in Pipe Line on April 12, 2023, on Saint-Claude, France, the birthplace of briar. Also in the long back when, on a cold Christmas afternoon, Pundit wandered into an Atlanta bricks and mortar pipe shop to look around. There, resting in an enclosed glass counter was an exquisite Comoy. An older gent, smoking a beautiful bent, asked me if I wanted to look at that pipe. It had a $100 price tag. A college student working for a grocery store chain to help with college tuition at the time, Pundit didn’t have one hundred cents, let alone a C note! I declined and found a $5 basket pipe. A Christmas tradition had just begun. Since that early time, Pundit has made it a holiday ritual to either reward himself, or a special friend, with pipe or tobacco. A Claudio Cavicchi would be nice. Just sayin.’ And now for a couple of December-born Pipe Smokers of the Past: Joseph Rudyard Kipling was born on Dec. 30, 1865, and died on Jan. 18, 1936. I always prefer to believe the best of everybody; it saves so much trouble—Rudyard Kipling. Martin Van Buren, born Dec. 5, 1782, and died July 24, 1862, U.S. President, 1837-1841 As to the presidency, the two happiest days of my life were those of my entrance upon the office and my surrender of it—Martin Van Buren. And one more note to recall a deceased World War II veteran who loved William Somerset Maugham, the author. Maugham, a pipe smoker, was born in Paris, France, on Jan. 25, 1874, and died on Dec. 16, 1965. One cool afternoon as the veteran and I talked while sitting in his backyard patio, he looked off into the distance as if studying something. Nothing in particular. Just looking. He turned to me and said if I wanted to learn about life, “read Somerset Maugham.” I did. It wasn’t until late in life that I discovered how easy it is to say, ‘I don’t know’ –W. Somerset Maugham And now a Parting Shot: Any day with an old friend with pipes and tobacco is a good day.
Haha everything is so true. I think the best way to convince hysterical and hypocritical people of their folly is to pick on their low intelligence and lacking common sense. However I have the feeling that it will take quite a while before the sheeple will have access to this information
Simply put, I agree
Well, I’m not sure I would settle for mere credit for having paid outrageous tobacco use taxes, but your idea would certainly reform the image of tobacco users — or at least inform the public of its revenue sources.
.
As for the broader issues your article brings to mind, I note that there are direct taxes such as income, property, and transfer taxes; and while I am opposed to them in principle (how did government survive prior to the 16th Ammendment of 1911 ? ), they seem to be a more equitable solution than putting the burden on one particular group (i.e. smokers).
.
And while I’m unhappy with, but not unalterably opposed to usage taxes, such as vehicle licensing, bridge and highway tolls, and gas taxes, I’m willing to pay for the conveniences they underwrite. I can even grudgingly deal with sin taxes (perhaps the earliest form) designed to discourage what the body-politic considers objectionable, because they can be addressed in the voting booth.
.
But what I absolutely cannot countenance is the inequity of arbitrarily taxing a politically weak group to meet revenue needs in totally unrelated areas. It is infuriating to learn that such revenues are often diverted by political interests and never reach their intended beneficiaries. That is nothing more than subterfuge and legislative larceny.
Correction: the 16th Ammendment passed in 1913.
To answer the original question about throwing somebody or something under the bus for the sake of the masses I have to wonder about having the masses lift the darn Bus!
p.s. I referring to lifting the bus so the few being thrown under the bus don’t get hurt.!
Do any of our “leaders” own a mirror? They must all be “graced” with strong stomachs or visually challenged. I continue to wonder just who these people work for?
Big Business. “The Masses”, as many of us like to think of ourselves, are either product on the shelf or consumer, and that’s the bottom line. Government’s main business is to stay in business, and confounding the law is a pastime. Great article, CRL
It’s the kind of contradictory mess described here that represents the political inequalities and excesses our society has produced. As pipe smokers, we had better unite and do it soon. We need to focus on a grassroots movement that is a well oiled PR machine and employs a sane voice against the onslaught of ravenous interest groups ripping us all off. Tobacco taxes are probably one of the best-worst examples of the misrepresentation of the efforts of an honest sector of the American public. Don’t people realize tobacco is one part of the backbone of agriculture upon which this nation was built? Unfortunately the cigarette industry’s megalomania has demonized the whole world of tobacco and we’re decades from reversing that unpopular image. In the meantime, batten down the hatches and take action well met fellows!