‘Deeming’ Down
-
Kevin Godbee - Jun 26, 2014
- 7 min read
Fred Brown
You, over there. The guy with the pipe in his mouth. How do you like being a FDA target? Feel good being zeroed-in by one of the largest federal bureaucracies in the known world? Getting accustomed to the big red and white target on your back? Maybe you are getting that ol’ hunted down feeling?
It’s going to get worse. Oh, you don’t have to take the Pipe Pundit’s word on this. Just go to the FDA’s own website and read all about "deeming." Or, check out the Federal Register on the subject.
Pipe tobacco has been "deemed" by this sprawling bureaucracy—at last count there were more than 14,000 people working in the agency—which means this according to the Federal Register:
FDA currently regulates cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco products. The law (Tobacco Control Act of 2009) also gave FDA the ability to regulate additional tobacco products, commonly referred to as "deeming" them through rulemaking. The proposed rule would include the following products under FDA’s authority: electronic cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, waterpipe (hookah) tobacco, and novel products like nicotine gels and dissolvables (sic) not already under FDA’s authority. . .
In a fit of misinformation, the FDA says,
"Once deemed, tobacco products become subject to the FD&C Act and its implementing regulations, affording FDA additional tools to use to reduce the number of illnesses and premature deaths associated with the use of tobacco products. For example, it would provide FDA with critical information regarding the health risks of the proposed deemed tobacco products including information derived from ingredient listing submissions and reporting of hazardous and potentially hazardous constituents required under the FD&C Act."
This means that the FDA is tossing pipe tobacco and cigars in with cigarettes. There is no effort to refine the law or regulation to show that the Surgeon General’s latest report says that smoking either a pipe or a cigar has relatively the same health risks as those who do not smoke.
So, "deeming" is skewed right from the start by FDA, citing its mandates from Congress, which, by the way, loves its cigars, too.
Cigars, along with pipe tobacco, recently became a "deemed" product by the FDA, which claims to be carrying out the mandates of the 2009 Tobacco Control Act, better known as the Family Tobacco Protection Act, which gave the FDA jurisdiction over tobacco products.
Rack up another one for the Antis. They win again.
Let the Pipe Pundit explain. The FDA has now extended its "comment" period for the new cigar and pipe tobacco "deeming" regs until July 9. There are two options in the new rules:
Option One: Would extend the FDA’s "tobacco product" authorities in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to all other categories of products, except accessories of a proposed deemed tobacco product, that meet the statutory definition of "tobacco product" in the FD&C Act.
In other words, Option One rounds up all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, for regulatory action. But, the FDA isn’t going to take away your cigar cutter or lighters. They aren’t interested in accessories. . . yet. That’s a thoughtful elimination, don’t you think?
Option Two: Would extend the Agency’s "tobacco product" authorities to all other categories of products, except premium cigars and the accessories of a proposed deemed tobacco product, that meet the statutory definition of "tobacco product" in the FD&C Act.
Again, the FDA is not after your lighter.
Now, everybody and his brother thinks that not including premium cigars in the new regs would be wonderful. Even some of the antis are saying they hate Option Two, but, obviously, for different reasons.
The University of California at San Francisco’s Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education puts it this way:
An unregulated premium cigar under Option 2 is defined as: "a cigar that (1) is wrapped in whole tobacco leaf; (2) contains a 100 percent leaf tobacco binder; (3) contains primarily long filler tobacco; (4) is made by combining manually the wrapper, filler, and binder; (5) has no filter, tip, or non-tobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand; (6) has a retail price (after any discounts or coupons) of no less that $10 per cigar (adjusted, as necessary, every 2 years, effective July 1st, to account for price increases in the price of tobacco products since the last price adjustment); (7) does not have a characterizing flavor other than tobacco; and (8) weighs more than 6 pounds per 1000 units".
And furthermore, the CTCRE says that Option 2 is not appropriate for the protection of the public health, and would result in negative public health consequences. Indeed, all the scientific evident that the FDA summarizes in the draft rule makes a compelling case for rejecting Option 2 and including all cigars among deemed products that will be subject to uniform regulations.
So, safe to say the antis aren’t happy with the FDA, either.
Here’s the hitch: If premium cigars get a bye on this one, there will be a new classification for all cigars that could cost the cigar consumer mucho down the road.
"Premium cigars" is a new title, a new dimension the FDA has discovered. Anything at or over $10 is a premium cigar, for the FDA. So, what is going to happen, you ask?
Every cigar in America is going to go up to $10 and more in order to bypass the new FDA cigar regs. A baseline price point for a cigar is going to start at $10 to avoid the FDA regulation.
When the FDA catches on (it was slooooooow with the roll-your-own cigarette ploy of claiming to be "pipe tobacco) it will simply raise the bottom line price. Ergo, cigar manufacturers will have little choice but to be in lockstep with FDA pricing rules.
Hold on now. Pipe tobacco isn’t mentioned anywhere that Pipe Pundit has read about being excluded in any sort of cockamamie way by the FDA.
And before the Pipe Pundit moves on to pipe tobacco, how do you like FDA’s getting into the cigar pricing business? Yeah, that’ll work!
Okay, now for pipe tobacco. As the Pipe Pundit sees it, FDA will come back at some future date, when it realizes that it has been had, again, and will begin tweaking pipe tobacco regs since the paper-pushers did conclude that the stuff we smoke in our pipes has been deemed a "tobacco product."
The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control claim unapologetically that 480,000 people "die annually from ‘tobacco-attributable’ diseases. "At this rate, there will be more than 17 million deaths from tobacco use between now and mid-century."
Just to keep the playing field somewhat level, let’s look at the numbers for those who die on the nation’s roads from drunk driving: About 30 per day or 10,200 a year in the latest figures provided by the CDC.
You can look all that up if you are a mind to at the CDC’s site here. Right, the CDC says more people die annually from smoking than die in auto crashes related to driving and alcohol.
Those smoking deaths, by the way, are from cigarettes, not pipes and cigars. And until the CDC breaks out the number specifically for pipe and cigar smokers, the Pipe Pundit is going to use the CDC’s claim that 480K die in the U.S. each year from smoking cigarettes; zero from smoking a pipe or cigar.
A couple of other points before summing up:
The CDC says that "Excessive alcohol consumption, the fourth leading preventable cause of death in the United States resulted in approximately 88,000 deaths and 2.5 million years of potential life lost annually during 2006–2010 and cost an estimated $223.5 billion in 2006.
I’m not a statistician by anyone’s imagination, but the CDC also says that in 2010, over 1.4 million drivers were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or narcotics.
The CDC says that is one percent of the 112 million episodes of alcohol-impaired driving among U.S. adults each year.
Drugs other than alcohol (i.e. marijuana and cocaine) are involved in about 18 percent of motor vehicle driver deaths. These other drugs are often used in combination with alcohol.
Uh, is it just me, or does having 1.4 million drunks knocking back beers and puffing weed on the nation’s highways seem like driving roulette?
Seems to the Pipe Pundit that it would be far more beneficial to one’s health to get those bleary-eyed, booze-fueled, pill-popping, weed-huffing drivers off the roadways rather than spend all that time telling pipe smokers how unhealthy they are, and that they are public pariahs.
|
|
Written by Kevin Godbee
8 Responses
Smokingpipes.com Updates
24 Fresh Rossi Pipes |
60 Fresh Savinelli Pipes |
12 Fresh Jacono Pipes |
New Cigars |
3 Fresh Askwith Pipes |
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 641. Our featured interview tonight is with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl and is featured in our recurring series, “Ask the Tobacco Blender”. However, tonight he will be the interviewee as we learn about how he became a pipe smoker and collector, when he got his first pipe and how he progressed from there. At the top of the show, Brian will have a review of the rare German tobacco blend, Tumblin’ Dice.
I remember the first time I heard someone else say it. “How many pipes do I need? Just one more.” It’s glib, sure, a bit of a joke, but it also rings a bell of truth, at least to me. I certainly have “enough” pipes, but pipes are seductive little things. Just when we think we’re all set, we have enough, another will come along that tempts us beyond any sense of reason. I suppose it’s the same way with any sort of collecting. There’s always another white whale we’re in pursuit of. When we finally track that one down, though, another will almost inevitably breach the surface, taking its place as the new object of our desire, enticing us to change course and set sail once again. But, there’s a potential problem with having a lot of pipes. Maybe. The more pipes we may have, the harder it can be to keep them in rotation. It makes sense. We tend to gravitate towards our current faves, the ones that most appeal to us for whatever reason, and sometimes, maybe they stay in rotation longer than they really should. The side-effect of this, of course, is that another favored pipe might end up too-long forgotten. That’s exactly what happened recently. Exhibit A: The Castello pictured is one that has been long overlooked. It’s a Trademark shape #55. It’s a really nice example of the shape. The red pearlized stem is beautifully done. The wood isn’t really anything special to look at, but it’s evenly covered, without any bald spots. When I look at it, I wonder why it wasn’t done in the more typical dark ruby-red finish that adorns most Trademarks. I’ve seen a great deal of variation amongst the grade over the years, including one really nice bent-bulldog that left the factory with a brown sandblasted finish. (For those who don’t know, Trademark has long been the lowest Castello smooth grade, usually finished in a dark red.) Was this a stamping/grading error, or is there just more leeway in the grade than we’ve come to expect? I might never know. This example is from the early 1970s, maybe even the late 1960s, identified by the upper case Ks in the grade designation. (On Sea Rock and Old Antiquari pipes, the Ks reflect the size, while with the smooth finishes, Trademark, Castello and Collection, the Ks represent the relative grade.) It has been living in a different rack than the one housing the majority of my #55s. I don’t recall why I put it there, but as many of us can relate to, rack space is often at a premium. I stumbled upon it while looking for something completely different. “Oh, you? Why are you there? I remember you smoke pretty well.” Yeah, I sometimes talk to my pipes – one of many quirks, I suppose. I won’t begin to worry until they start talking back. I grabbed it from the rack, dusted it off, and decided to give it a fill with a bowl of a slightly aged VA/perique blend, Telegraph Hill, from 2018. What a delightful smoke! At five years, the tobacco is expressing a lot of the complexities of aged Virginias and the perique adds a delightful fruitiness. When young, the composition is a bit brighter, maybe a little spicier, but time has polished any edges, and amplified the sweeter notes. Like the pipe, I’d forgotten about this blend for quite a while, but one evening in March, after chatting with my good friend Nate, who is quite a fan of it, I decided it might be time to revisit it. I got a couple of fresh ones, and excavated a couple older tins from the library. I normally reach for Fillmore when I want a VA/perique thing because of its boldness and depth, but in revisiting this one, I’m finding something soothing and comfortable about it that I’ve really been enjoying, both young and aged. Sticking with the theme of the forgotten, and as a perhaps interesting tidbit to the photographically inclined, I shot the pictures for this month’s column with my old Nikkor-O 35mm/2.0 mounted on my trusty Nikon Df. The last time I used this lens, it was adapted to one of my Fujifilm bodies, and I didn’t care much for the results, so I put it away and pretty much forgot about it. But, I’ve recently been exploring some of my old kit, deciding what to keep, what to pass along, and this one once again came to my attention, kind of like that old Castello. On the Df, there’s something about its vintage rendering that I find truly appealing. Another forgotten treasure, and just like with that old pipe, it seems that, at least today, everything old is new again. If your collection is on the large side, are there pipes or tobaccos that you’ve all but forgotten, only to come back to them one day to find yourself wondering why? Maybe it’s just another fun dimension to this endlessly fascinating journey.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 640. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Ben Rapaport. Ben has been known internationally as an avid pipe smoker, antique pipe collector, and book author. His first book on pipes was published in 1972, and his latest book – his 10th – is out now in very limited quantities. The distribution has already sold out, but you can still get a copy of “The Wide World of Wood Tobacco Pipes. Two Centuries of Craftsmanship and Creativity” by contacting him directly at ben70gray@gmail.com. At the top of the show we’ll be turning the tables on our recurring Ask the Pipemaker segment. This time, Jeff Gracik will ask the questions, which Brian will answer as a pipe collector, and you can give your answers too.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 639. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Per Billhäll. Per is the owner of Scandinavian Pipes, which is an online retailer of high grade pipes. He started smoking pipes in the 1960s. His first high grade pipe was made by Hans “Former” Nielsen, who is one of the living legends from Denmark. That led to Per becoming a huge pipe and tobacco collector, and show attendee where he became well known. Along with pipe book author Jan Andersson, they started The Pipe Club of Sweden in 1991. Then in 1999, Per started “Scan Pipes”. He is now one of the pipe retailing legends from Sweden. At the top of the show Brian will talk about holiday blends, and other special pipe tobacco blends.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 638. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Fae “The Sassy Pipe Lady” Simmons. Fae is the owner of Tobacco Treasures, which sells new, vintage, & estate pipes, and smoking accessories on Etsy. She has been in business since 2017, and has been surrounded by pipes and tobacco most of her life. Her father and his brother smoked pipes, and so does Fae. Her husband is also a retired tobacconist that worked all over the industry from coast to coast for several different companies in the industry. She has a great story of how her business got started with a great inventory of unsmoked vintage pipes. At the top of the show we will have an Ask the Tobacco Blender segment with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl, which is one of the most popular boutique pipe tobacco companies in the USA.
Ok, so it’s that time of year, as we all know. Family feasts, houses, yards, and big trees festooned with lights and dangling ornaments, just high enough to keep the cats from reaching a paw into the greenery. It’s also the time of year when your pipe-smoking-significant other makes vast hints about a new pipe. That’s to be expected since he or she was a good boy or girl during the year. Yes, ladies smoke pipes, too. Oh, you want an example? Okay, try Actress Greta Garbo, Millicent Fenwick, Mary Frith, and my late grandmother (who died when she was 93) dipped snuff and smoked a cob occasionally. So now that we have settled that the gentler side of life will puff a pipe too, let’s move on to the upcoming biggest holiday of all. Of course, that huge event is brought to us by the hefty fellow in a red suit, puffing his pipe all the way in a sled filled with presents, being led by a reindeer with a red nose. Or some such. That’s Santa Claus, of course. Becoming a bit more serious, Christmas is such a wonderful time for families and friends. It’s also quite special for pipe puffers. For many of us, this brings up a nostalgic look back to our pipe-smoking or cigar-smoking friends who have died during the current year. A great journalist pal whom I often joined in a local brick-and-mortar pipe and cigar shop. I puffed my pipe, and occasional cigar, as he enjoyed a cigar. He died in October and will be missed. On the happier side of things, Christmas is also a time when mind workers of the world renew their collections with fresh additions. Pundit included. A French passion has overtaken Pundit, from reading more Albert Camus, a heavy cigarette smoker, as were many French intellectuals of a certain time. Instead of cigarettes many of us prefer the more relaxed enjoyment of pipes for that “calm and objective judgment” in the comings and goings of the world. This brings me to French pipes. While visiting France once in the long ago, I happened by a “Tabac” shop in Paris, Tabac Des Vosges. I purchased a beauty of a Chacom bent. I also later bought a Ropp made from ancient briar. To learn more about the dawn of briar pipes and beginnings, take a peek at a well-done piece by Davin Hylton in Pipe Line on April 12, 2023, on Saint-Claude, France, the birthplace of briar. Also in the long back when, on a cold Christmas afternoon, Pundit wandered into an Atlanta bricks and mortar pipe shop to look around. There, resting in an enclosed glass counter was an exquisite Comoy. An older gent, smoking a beautiful bent, asked me if I wanted to look at that pipe. It had a $100 price tag. A college student working for a grocery store chain to help with college tuition at the time, Pundit didn’t have one hundred cents, let alone a C note! I declined and found a $5 basket pipe. A Christmas tradition had just begun. Since that early time, Pundit has made it a holiday ritual to either reward himself, or a special friend, with pipe or tobacco. A Claudio Cavicchi would be nice. Just sayin.’ And now for a couple of December-born Pipe Smokers of the Past: Joseph Rudyard Kipling was born on Dec. 30, 1865, and died on Jan. 18, 1936. I always prefer to believe the best of everybody; it saves so much trouble—Rudyard Kipling. Martin Van Buren, born Dec. 5, 1782, and died July 24, 1862, U.S. President, 1837-1841 As to the presidency, the two happiest days of my life were those of my entrance upon the office and my surrender of it—Martin Van Buren. And one more note to recall a deceased World War II veteran who loved William Somerset Maugham, the author. Maugham, a pipe smoker, was born in Paris, France, on Jan. 25, 1874, and died on Dec. 16, 1965. One cool afternoon as the veteran and I talked while sitting in his backyard patio, he looked off into the distance as if studying something. Nothing in particular. Just looking. He turned to me and said if I wanted to learn about life, “read Somerset Maugham.” I did. It wasn’t until late in life that I discovered how easy it is to say, ‘I don’t know’ –W. Somerset Maugham And now a Parting Shot: Any day with an old friend with pipes and tobacco is a good day.
I’m just a little confused as to what this means for us as pipe smokers. will pipe tobacco just be taxed much more? does this mean we won’t be able to get our favorite blends from the UK, Italy, or Denmark? Is this the end of online sales? Will the new regulations/restrictions make it difficult for blenders to comply, leading to disappearance of certain blends?
Just looking for a little clarity here. All I got from this article was that the FDA will most likely start regulating pipe tobacco. But, what does that MEAN?
“There is no effort to refine the law or regulation to show that the Surgeon General’s latest report says that smoking either a pipe or a cigar has relatively the same health risks as those who do not smoke.”
Do you have a link to this report? I’d like to add that to my arsenal. :o)
Thanks!
I’d expect nothing less from this administration. The “Nanny State” is out of control. Contact state and federal reps; that’s what I do.
Two points about pipe tobacco as it relates to the FDA. Taxes aren’t under the control of the FDA, so they can’t raise taxes. That would have to be done by Congress with Presidential approval, so there’s no worry right now.
However, they will grandfather in all pipe tobacco on the market by February 15, 2007, but anything marketed after that date will be subjected to testing before approval, and the testing is very expensive, meaning that many more recent blends will have to disappear. Going to the FDA website to make your comments (be polite, please) will help our efforts to minimize the damage.
Russ
In Washington, pot is legal and a tobacco smoker is almost burnt at the stake. Typical government . . . I’ve sent my comments to FDA (yes they were polite).
According to the CDC, 18.1% of American adults smoke, and the rate is declining.
According to the CDC, 34.9% of American adults are obese, and the rate is increasing.
Methinks the politicians are fighting the wrong windmill.
Russ is absolutely right, and maybe I should have been clearer on the “grandfather” clause with the FDA and new tobaccos.
As for taxes, my view is that anything the FDA does is hand-in-glove with Congress and the Executive Branch and will eventually make its way to the taxing coffers and a hand in my pockets.
Congress has never seen a tobacco tax it didn’t like.
For me, the FDA merely has to indicate intentions in proposed policy or regulations that a tax increase is needed to dampen desire for tobacco and Congress is ready to vote (awwww, am I being too hard on that hard-working Congress?)
A politician told me a long time ago I should remember the golden rule when it comes to politics: “He who has the gold writes the rule.”
What pipe smokers need is a United Pipe Smokers of America group, like Cigar Rights of America to give our side a little air and muscle on Capitol Hill.
To kaydet81: Go here: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/tobacco/, for the Surgeon General’s reports. All of them, from 1960 up through the present day.
I’ve searched and can find no definitive figures on pipes and cigars separate from cigarettes. If you find that I’m wrong, let me know.
And, yes, Murf, the FDA will eventually be regulating pipe tobacco. That is inevitable and has been since the law passed in 2009 and was signed by President Obama. It’s just a matter of time.
As for specific blends, etc., I can’t point them out, and I no longer order tobacco from Europe. That’s way too expensive for me, but I am trying to put away as much pipe tobacco as my pocketbook can afford in preparation for the day that the uh, ah, sky falls in on us.
I’ve written on this subject before and have been called a Chicken Little. That’s okay with me. I have been called worse names starting with the word “Chicken.”
However, I’m trying to prepare for Tobaccogeddon. And, hey, if it never happens, then mayhaps I hedged a few price increases on my fav blends.
Thanks for the questions guys and I especially appreciate Russ’s clarity. He is a heck of a lot closer to the vicissitudes of pipe and cigar regulations than the Pipe Pundit.
I just smoke ‘em when I got ‘em.
Tobacco suffers the blight of social engineering like few other products. You can blame this on cigarettes, and do-gooders who like to concentrate on it due to the fact that its use constitutes “luxury” and cancer simultaneously. That’s all about cigarettes though, because that’s where the attention has been, and “tested”, and the debate dwells around cigarette use. Only by extension are cigars and pipes included in the equation.
You might think alcohol is nutritious or character-building with the way it is marketed- with negligible warnings. Drinking wine by extension makes you a “connoisseur” of something rare and special. Cigars and pipes both need that “rare and special” vibe/meme which quality booze, wine and even beer now enjoys. That’s a tall order, I know.
While I hesitate to invoke anything to do with the ongoing “culture wars” (knowing the destructive fallout surrounding them, I myself largely remain agnostic) finding a way to cast dispersions on the FDA is most in order.
That left/right divide is just the place where we get destroyed big-time. Odious (perceived or otherwise) characters like R Limbaugh and his cigars haven’t helped us a whole lot. Meanwhile many on the left will maintain on the point of their lives that the FDA is in the hands of corporations and does nothing to keep we consumers safe- especially when compared with Europe, which bans all sorts of substances the FDA does not, including GMOS.
My own perception is that the FDA is totally bogus; absolutely arbitrary. They have no interest in the welfare of the US consumer and at the same time will always defer to corporate interests, unless in the case of tobacco which is on the losing end of the social-engineering stick.
Note that in the last half-century or more, the FDA has given carte-blanche permission to an endless amount of products which probably should be illegal- with very little testing. To this day there are endless arguments about plastics and EMF-producing appliances, not to mention soaps, cleaning products, sweeteners and what-have-you. If one-tenth of the pressure exerted on tobacco was also applied to millions of other products, we’d no longer be wearing clothes, living in our houses, driving cars or buying the products we do.
The economy would collapse. Billions of internal combustion engines can gas us into unconsciousness and the planet to hell and back, but a tiny minority of disgruntled, logic-impaired do-gooders can get their panties in a bunch over nanny-state chicken-little-isms and exert useless legislation to the detriment of the rest of us.
The lawyerly-minded and actual attorneys must mount this argument. We all know the fact that restaurant/bar owners can not keep their doors open to a smoker-only clientele with smoker-only staff is clearly UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Let’s remember that “assault rifles” might as well be nutritious too.
Acquiescence to blind authority is how we became self-absorbed couch potatoes waiting for our next TV show. We get the Gov’t we deserve.