‘Deeming’ Down
-
Kevin Godbee - Jun 26, 2014
- 7 min read
Fred Brown
You, over there. The guy with the pipe in his mouth. How do you like being a FDA target? Feel good being zeroed-in by one of the largest federal bureaucracies in the known world? Getting accustomed to the big red and white target on your back? Maybe you are getting that ol’ hunted down feeling?
It’s going to get worse. Oh, you don’t have to take the Pipe Pundit’s word on this. Just go to the FDA’s own website and read all about "deeming." Or, check out the Federal Register on the subject.
Pipe tobacco has been "deemed" by this sprawling bureaucracy—at last count there were more than 14,000 people working in the agency—which means this according to the Federal Register:
FDA currently regulates cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco products. The law (Tobacco Control Act of 2009) also gave FDA the ability to regulate additional tobacco products, commonly referred to as "deeming" them through rulemaking. The proposed rule would include the following products under FDA’s authority: electronic cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, waterpipe (hookah) tobacco, and novel products like nicotine gels and dissolvables (sic) not already under FDA’s authority. . .
In a fit of misinformation, the FDA says,
"Once deemed, tobacco products become subject to the FD&C Act and its implementing regulations, affording FDA additional tools to use to reduce the number of illnesses and premature deaths associated with the use of tobacco products. For example, it would provide FDA with critical information regarding the health risks of the proposed deemed tobacco products including information derived from ingredient listing submissions and reporting of hazardous and potentially hazardous constituents required under the FD&C Act."
This means that the FDA is tossing pipe tobacco and cigars in with cigarettes. There is no effort to refine the law or regulation to show that the Surgeon General’s latest report says that smoking either a pipe or a cigar has relatively the same health risks as those who do not smoke.
So, "deeming" is skewed right from the start by FDA, citing its mandates from Congress, which, by the way, loves its cigars, too.
Cigars, along with pipe tobacco, recently became a "deemed" product by the FDA, which claims to be carrying out the mandates of the 2009 Tobacco Control Act, better known as the Family Tobacco Protection Act, which gave the FDA jurisdiction over tobacco products.
Rack up another one for the Antis. They win again.
Let the Pipe Pundit explain. The FDA has now extended its "comment" period for the new cigar and pipe tobacco "deeming" regs until July 9. There are two options in the new rules:
Option One: Would extend the FDA’s "tobacco product" authorities in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to all other categories of products, except accessories of a proposed deemed tobacco product, that meet the statutory definition of "tobacco product" in the FD&C Act.
In other words, Option One rounds up all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, for regulatory action. But, the FDA isn’t going to take away your cigar cutter or lighters. They aren’t interested in accessories. . . yet. That’s a thoughtful elimination, don’t you think?
Option Two: Would extend the Agency’s "tobacco product" authorities to all other categories of products, except premium cigars and the accessories of a proposed deemed tobacco product, that meet the statutory definition of "tobacco product" in the FD&C Act.
Again, the FDA is not after your lighter.
Now, everybody and his brother thinks that not including premium cigars in the new regs would be wonderful. Even some of the antis are saying they hate Option Two, but, obviously, for different reasons.
The University of California at San Francisco’s Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education puts it this way:
An unregulated premium cigar under Option 2 is defined as: "a cigar that (1) is wrapped in whole tobacco leaf; (2) contains a 100 percent leaf tobacco binder; (3) contains primarily long filler tobacco; (4) is made by combining manually the wrapper, filler, and binder; (5) has no filter, tip, or non-tobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand; (6) has a retail price (after any discounts or coupons) of no less that $10 per cigar (adjusted, as necessary, every 2 years, effective July 1st, to account for price increases in the price of tobacco products since the last price adjustment); (7) does not have a characterizing flavor other than tobacco; and (8) weighs more than 6 pounds per 1000 units".
And furthermore, the CTCRE says that Option 2 is not appropriate for the protection of the public health, and would result in negative public health consequences. Indeed, all the scientific evident that the FDA summarizes in the draft rule makes a compelling case for rejecting Option 2 and including all cigars among deemed products that will be subject to uniform regulations.
So, safe to say the antis aren’t happy with the FDA, either.
Here’s the hitch: If premium cigars get a bye on this one, there will be a new classification for all cigars that could cost the cigar consumer mucho down the road.
"Premium cigars" is a new title, a new dimension the FDA has discovered. Anything at or over $10 is a premium cigar, for the FDA. So, what is going to happen, you ask?
Every cigar in America is going to go up to $10 and more in order to bypass the new FDA cigar regs. A baseline price point for a cigar is going to start at $10 to avoid the FDA regulation.
When the FDA catches on (it was slooooooow with the roll-your-own cigarette ploy of claiming to be "pipe tobacco) it will simply raise the bottom line price. Ergo, cigar manufacturers will have little choice but to be in lockstep with FDA pricing rules.
Hold on now. Pipe tobacco isn’t mentioned anywhere that Pipe Pundit has read about being excluded in any sort of cockamamie way by the FDA.
And before the Pipe Pundit moves on to pipe tobacco, how do you like FDA’s getting into the cigar pricing business? Yeah, that’ll work!
Okay, now for pipe tobacco. As the Pipe Pundit sees it, FDA will come back at some future date, when it realizes that it has been had, again, and will begin tweaking pipe tobacco regs since the paper-pushers did conclude that the stuff we smoke in our pipes has been deemed a "tobacco product."
The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control claim unapologetically that 480,000 people "die annually from ‘tobacco-attributable’ diseases. "At this rate, there will be more than 17 million deaths from tobacco use between now and mid-century."
Just to keep the playing field somewhat level, let’s look at the numbers for those who die on the nation’s roads from drunk driving: About 30 per day or 10,200 a year in the latest figures provided by the CDC.
You can look all that up if you are a mind to at the CDC’s site here. Right, the CDC says more people die annually from smoking than die in auto crashes related to driving and alcohol.
Those smoking deaths, by the way, are from cigarettes, not pipes and cigars. And until the CDC breaks out the number specifically for pipe and cigar smokers, the Pipe Pundit is going to use the CDC’s claim that 480K die in the U.S. each year from smoking cigarettes; zero from smoking a pipe or cigar.
A couple of other points before summing up:
The CDC says that "Excessive alcohol consumption, the fourth leading preventable cause of death in the United States resulted in approximately 88,000 deaths and 2.5 million years of potential life lost annually during 2006–2010 and cost an estimated $223.5 billion in 2006.
I’m not a statistician by anyone’s imagination, but the CDC also says that in 2010, over 1.4 million drivers were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or narcotics.
The CDC says that is one percent of the 112 million episodes of alcohol-impaired driving among U.S. adults each year.
Drugs other than alcohol (i.e. marijuana and cocaine) are involved in about 18 percent of motor vehicle driver deaths. These other drugs are often used in combination with alcohol.
Uh, is it just me, or does having 1.4 million drunks knocking back beers and puffing weed on the nation’s highways seem like driving roulette?
Seems to the Pipe Pundit that it would be far more beneficial to one’s health to get those bleary-eyed, booze-fueled, pill-popping, weed-huffing drivers off the roadways rather than spend all that time telling pipe smokers how unhealthy they are, and that they are public pariahs.
|
|
Written by Kevin Godbee
8 Responses
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 512! On tonight’s show we have a new episode of an ongoing segment of what Brian likes to call “Inside Fred’s Head” with Fred Hanna. Fred is a well-known pipe collector, author, and speaker at pipe shows. He has a PhD. in psychology and teaches the same at the Chicago Campus at Adler University. He is also author of the book, “The Perfect Smoke”. This is the ninth in the series with a long form discussion of pipe and tobacco questions sent in by our listeners. In the opening “Pipe Parts” segment, Brian will go over the JDRF auction items. Sit back, relax with your pipe, and enjoy The Pipes Magazine Radio Show!
Cellaring tobacco happens in a few ways; some intentional, others incidental. As any member of this forum could certainly attest, adding a few more tins than one can smoke in a reasonable amount of time to an order (or even just one more tin to hit that free shipping threshold) is a by-product of being consistently engaged in the hobby (or pastime, or however you think of this thing we all do). Hopping on the hype train for a new blend, a limited seasonal release, or small-batch experiment from the blending houses is certainly to blame for more than a few stockpiles—it’s easy to become mesmerized by the dizzying variety of superb product available to us today. Frequently it’s the draw of a well-timed sale coinciding with a surplus in discretionary funds—I can’t be the only one who somehow ended up with 115 pounds of Mixture 79 in their cellar, can I? Now and again it’s something as simple as lovely tin art, or a name that conjures a fond memory, or just boredom with our current rotation that inspires an irregular purchase of a random blend. Thus the discovery of a lone tin of Fribourg & Treyer’s Blackjack circa 2011 in my own collection falls somewhere around the last example. My preferred lane in pipe blends decidedly tends toward Virginias, and this purchase was something that I assume I had picked up for breaking the routine of my old standards in that genre. This was also obtained at a time slightly before I had been keeping a detailed tasting journal, so although I know I’d smoked it before and recall it as a solid performer, no notes of the experiences I’d had previously were recorded. Nevertheless, I was excited to embark on that journey of re-discovery, expecting to find a new standby or a lost gem. Fribourg & Treyer is a top-notch marque of the estimable Kohlhase & Kopp house, perhaps a bit underrated in the States, and by and large deliver solid value with quality and variety aplenty in their portfolio. A tin of any Virginia tobacco with a decade under its lid is a treasure to hold, with the promise of a monk-worthy satori waiting on just the other side of that lid. What wonderful things may time and chance have created? This is the heart of cellardiving—the possibility that old blends can become new again, perhaps something entirely other than their younger selves, much like we as people do. Sometimes, with a bit of luck and a lot of chance, a tobacco can even become a transformative experience, that holy grail of substances, manna from heaven. What wonders lay in store for me behind the old-fashioned black and white lid? What wondrous alchemy has transpired while unattended? Waiting for just the right time, with just the right pipe, I readied myself to be floored by the decadent treat inside…. The seal was good, the tobacco inside still quite moist, and its bouquet was full of notes of fresh cut spring hay, sharp tangy oak, and flat diet cola, which tempered down to include dry raisin and a hint of chocolate overtones after some days’ air time. Moving on to the smoke itself, it was good—very good in fact, for one who enjoys an unassuming, unadorned Virginia. If I were tasting it blindfolded I’d have guessed it had some small bit of Izmir in it, as the smoke leaned heavily into that Turkish flavor profile, but careful inspection of the leaf seemed to reveal only the ingredients as advertised: a ready-rubbed pure Red Virginia flake of excellent quality, well-tumbled and rather uniformly chestnut brown. The blend is good, undeniably—it hits that sharp, tangy note that it should, burns easily, has a pleasantly light mouthfeel with no bite; almost all the things a solid Virginia should have, if lacking in any definable sweetness or much in the way of a citrusy cast. The flavor profile intones old familiar Virginia notes—grassy vegetal shades that in this instance were more mellowed into the territory of silage, with the sharpness of a Wisconsin cheddar and a hint of burned rubber when overheating the mid-bowl—but it was still just…very good. No angels appeared with trumpets, no out-of-body experience, no whirlwind of emotions, no fireworks or fanfare…just a solid, steady, straight Virginia smoke. Perhaps it was the pipe? Testing out a variety of pipes, all similarly dedicated to light Virginia blends, yielded results that were only remarkable for their similarity. My packing technique, though it may lack grace, seemed adequate to keep it burning with only a light or two throughout an entire bowl, so that shouldn’t be the issue. Time of day, accompanying beverage, pre- or post-meal, it was always the same blend. No, I had to face it: at issue were my preconceptions and expectations for the tobacco itself. I had gone fishing for Moby Dick, and turned up only herring. The greater part of my consternation at being underwhelmed by the experience lay in my own expectations and assumptions regarding aged tobacco in general. To be fair, I have had some enlightenment-grade tobacco experiences. A larger percentage of moderately- to well-aged blends, at least in my reckoning, are decidedly wonderful—sometimes dancing around the edges of sublime: sometimes merely far superior to a fresh batch, sometimes becoming something entirely different and unique, but generally very, very good. Another, perhaps larger, percentage show little to no change, and another small percentage show marked decline. By all indicators, this tin should have been something special…shouldn’t it have? Perhaps. As it was, it fell squarely in the percentage of little change. And it took me a couple days to reconcile myself with being alright with that, and hoping to learn from it. “Things aren’t different. Things are things.” So opines Wintermute, the hidden protagonist of Neuromancer, a novel I re-read with alarming regularity. The kernel of truth here is that with one’s perceptions, it’s somewhere between being a matter of perspective and a […]
This may sound a bit over the top, but our pipe community is held together by some equivalent of the law of binding energy. So sayeth Dr. Pundit. Harrumph! Simply put, the law says the universe is held together by binding energy. Seen another way, the law explains in a blackboard full of Einsteinian math the energy it takes to separate us from the universe. Or something. Now, without getting too overwrought in the physics or chemistry of binding energy, let’s just say we are a bound community of pipe-loving groups. It would require a great deal of energy to separate us from our hobby. The Pundit has not run off the rails yet. See, our energy is connected through a community of pipes and tobacco, a village of individuals who enjoy just sitting around pontificating and puffing our beloved pipes. That’s binding and energetic. You get it if you have ever participated in a pipe club gathering. There is not enough energy to scramble one atom of our togetherness. That’s our law of binding energy. This short lecture is a windy opening to what is today’s reality in the pipe world, and our daily lives. Pay attention, class. There will be a pop quiz at the end of this discourse. Of late we have seen tectonic shifts in the “old normal.” The good old days, so it seems to the Pundit, have been pummeled by powerful events: the Covid pandemic virus and its many mutations of tragedy; supply chain choke holds; massive cargo ships becoming lodged in narrow river lanes like toy boats in a ditch; the Great Resignation spreading like a virus; a disastrous war in Ukraine and the threat of even more violence. Ok, the Pundit gets it. Enough of gloom and doom. Back to the original thought of our law of binding energy. It is similar to the law of supply and demand for pipe smokers. In simplest terms, when all other economic factors remain constant, the law of supply says that if prices go up, supply generally rises. But if supply remains constant, and prices continue to rise, demand generally drops. For us pipe smokers, supply and demand have been somewhat steady during these upside-down years. We have access to sufficient supply and, mostly, prices have not resulted in a bank shot off the charts. We pipe puffers have our own law of supply and demand, similar to our law of biding energy. Now, for the promised pop quiz. Pay attention, for another lecture of sorts is in order after this. Pop question: how do supply and demand affect pipe smokers? You in the back: “More supply means we have fewer pipes.” Wow, you weren’t paying attention. Ok, one more. You in the front row with your hand half raised: “We have too many pipes on cargo ships.” You fail, too. Correct answer: The Law of Supply and Demand may affect other segments of society, but not so much the pipes and tobacco community. There are too many of us in the demand side. No matter the prices. There, you have it. Now on to more important matters. Why do we celebrate Independence Day? If your answer is because some yokels in Boston tossed tea in an ocean, or it’s because we fly flags and blast fireworks into the night skies, one might want to dig a little deeper. Ok, so why do we celebrate? You there in the corner half asleep. “To celebrate independence from some king, or something.” Well, yes, but I was looking for a more profound answer. Such as, from whom did we snatch independence from the jaws of colonialism? In a more perfect union, the Fourth of July is the day the original thirteen colonies signed the Declaration of Independence, giving birth to a new America, and unbuckling itself from the nutjob King George III and Great Britain. America is 246 years young this July 4th. Ok, that was a little harsh about the royal nutjob. King Georgie suffered from insanity in spurts. History records that many of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, as well as those who penned the document, were tobacco farmers. This founding fathers’ fact, dear friends, gives pipe smokers bragging rights! So, the heart of all this is that after we’ve fired off that bucket full of fireworks to celebrate our precious independence, we can savor the notion that pipe smoking in America is not only patriotic but also historic. It’s that binding energy continuum thing. Tobacco formed the first cash crop of the British colonies. Think Jamestown and John Rolfe, the guy who married Pocahontas and was big in early Virginia politics. He also enjoyed tobacco and planted a crop of West Indies seeds, allegedly, in Jamestown in 1612. And on the money side, by the time of the runup to the American Revolution, just about all of the Southern Founding Fathers owed their wealth to the sale of tobacco. And to be historically correct, not all of them smoked tobacco. But tobacco smoking was common among the Founders, particularly using churchwarden-long clay pipes in the inns. See, many of the Founding Fathers (a tasty aromatic blend from Cornell & Diehl, just sayin’), were also pipe smokers. The author of the Declaration, Thomas Jefferson, was a tobacco farmer who puffed a pipe for a brief time. Benjamin Franklin was likewise a short-time pipe smoker while helping to edit the famous freedom document. We can forgive ol’ Benjy because floating a kite near lightning with a lit pipe might not have been a promising idea. Founders John Adams and James Madison, also tobacco farmers, knew a good pipe blend when they smoked one. By the way, Dolley Madison, wife of the fourth U.S. President, smoked a pipe and allegedly cigars as well. And now, dear friends, I hope by the time you read this epistle, you have had or will have a binding energy type Fourth. Finally, a message from our first U.S. President, […]
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 511! Our featured interview tonight is with pipe maker Nate King. Nate started smoking pipes in 2004, and starting making them in 2005. Prior to that he worked in the Indy race business where as a transmission specialist, precision and attention to detail is a high priority, and this carries over into his pipe making. Nate makes all kinds of pipes from the classic shapes, to whimsical. retro-inspired pieces such as a commission inspired by an old-style microphone. He has also participated in many collaborations on pipe designs, such as with fellow pipe maker Michael Lindner, and tobacco blender Gregory Pease. In Pipe Parts, Brian will have a pipe review, and at the end of the show we will have a guest rant. Sit back, relax with your pipe, and enjoy The Pipes Magazine Radio Show!
Via press release dated June 22, 2022 – Kapp & Peterson is pleased to announce that as of 23 May, it has relocated to a new facility in the Deansgrange neighborhood of County Dublin — a relatively short walk from its previous home in Sallynoggin. Moving is not something the Dublin-based institution takes lightly. “We were in Sallynoggin for 50 years,” says Managing Director Joshua Burgess. “And Sallynoggin was only our second home after moving from the original St. Stephen’s Green factory in 1972.” Peterson’s staff leaves behind fond memories of Sallynoggin. “The factory in Sallynoggin was my first job,” says Factory Manager Jonathan Fields. “I worked in that building when I got married; I worked there when my kids were born.” “Despite our attachment to the building and the community, the move ultimately made a lot of sense for us,” says Burgess. “When Laudisi acquired Kapp & Peterson in 2018, we were able to sign a four-year lease. As our time in the building came to a close, we took a hard look at our needs,” he continues. Those needs included more space and updated infrastructure. “We reached a point where if we wanted to continue to grow and do things like update our tooling, some big changes were necessary,” notes Burgess. “For example, the electrical capacity of the building had reached its limit. The electrician at one point said, sort of jokingly, ‘No more machines. I can’t add one more machine without doing a serious overhaul of the electrical.’” “Moving the factory was a really big project,” says Fields, “but we wanted to make it happen with as little disruption to the staff and our pipe making as possible.” To that end, the entire Peterson staff pitched in, moving the equipment, tools, and briar that they know best. “We moved all our machinery and pipes in three days,” says Fields. “We left Sallynoggin on a Wednesday and started making pipes in our new home the following Monday.” After four weeks in their new location, the men and women who make Peterson pipes are settling into their new home. “The new place is great,” says Tony Whelan, former factory manager and 50-year Peterson veteran. “When I volunteered to help with the move, I became the first employee in Peterson history to work in three different locations. I’m proud of that.” In addition, Fields notes that the entire staff is getting to know its new neighbors. “The Grange pub is a good place to head after work. They pour a nice Guinness.” Peterson now finds itself with ample space for growth in pipe making and storage. “In the new space, we’re able to group work together in an intuitive way,” says Burgess. “All the machines that are related to drilling — bowls, mortises, mouthpieces — can now be in the same production line. It promotes better collaboration when everyone who’s doing the same sort of work is stationed together.” Sykes Wilford, Laudisi’s CEO, recently worked alongside the staff in its new location. “I’m so pleased with the new place and all the work the guys did to make it happen,” says Wilford. “Peterson has a bright future here, and I’m convinced that the new factory furthers our goal of making excellent pipes, firmly in the Peterson tradition.”
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 510! Our featured interview tonight is part three with Fred Janusek. He is a Doctor of Pipes, and professor of mathematics. Fred is in his early 80s, and he has been smoking a pipe since college in 1957. His first pipe was a very shellac-covered Yello Bole. These are some great stories of back in the day when pipes were everywhere. We will skip our usual opening segment as we have that much good material from Fred. Sit back, relax with your pipe, and enjoy The Pipes Magazine Radio Show!
I’m just a little confused as to what this means for us as pipe smokers. will pipe tobacco just be taxed much more? does this mean we won’t be able to get our favorite blends from the UK, Italy, or Denmark? Is this the end of online sales? Will the new regulations/restrictions make it difficult for blenders to comply, leading to disappearance of certain blends?
Just looking for a little clarity here. All I got from this article was that the FDA will most likely start regulating pipe tobacco. But, what does that MEAN?
“There is no effort to refine the law or regulation to show that the Surgeon General’s latest report says that smoking either a pipe or a cigar has relatively the same health risks as those who do not smoke.”
Do you have a link to this report? I’d like to add that to my arsenal. :o)
Thanks!
I’d expect nothing less from this administration. The “Nanny State” is out of control. Contact state and federal reps; that’s what I do.
Two points about pipe tobacco as it relates to the FDA. Taxes aren’t under the control of the FDA, so they can’t raise taxes. That would have to be done by Congress with Presidential approval, so there’s no worry right now.
However, they will grandfather in all pipe tobacco on the market by February 15, 2007, but anything marketed after that date will be subjected to testing before approval, and the testing is very expensive, meaning that many more recent blends will have to disappear. Going to the FDA website to make your comments (be polite, please) will help our efforts to minimize the damage.
Russ
In Washington, pot is legal and a tobacco smoker is almost burnt at the stake. Typical government . . . I’ve sent my comments to FDA (yes they were polite).
According to the CDC, 18.1% of American adults smoke, and the rate is declining.
According to the CDC, 34.9% of American adults are obese, and the rate is increasing.
Methinks the politicians are fighting the wrong windmill.
Russ is absolutely right, and maybe I should have been clearer on the “grandfather” clause with the FDA and new tobaccos.
As for taxes, my view is that anything the FDA does is hand-in-glove with Congress and the Executive Branch and will eventually make its way to the taxing coffers and a hand in my pockets.
Congress has never seen a tobacco tax it didn’t like.
For me, the FDA merely has to indicate intentions in proposed policy or regulations that a tax increase is needed to dampen desire for tobacco and Congress is ready to vote (awwww, am I being too hard on that hard-working Congress?)
A politician told me a long time ago I should remember the golden rule when it comes to politics: “He who has the gold writes the rule.”
What pipe smokers need is a United Pipe Smokers of America group, like Cigar Rights of America to give our side a little air and muscle on Capitol Hill.
To kaydet81: Go here: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/tobacco/, for the Surgeon General’s reports. All of them, from 1960 up through the present day.
I’ve searched and can find no definitive figures on pipes and cigars separate from cigarettes. If you find that I’m wrong, let me know.
And, yes, Murf, the FDA will eventually be regulating pipe tobacco. That is inevitable and has been since the law passed in 2009 and was signed by President Obama. It’s just a matter of time.
As for specific blends, etc., I can’t point them out, and I no longer order tobacco from Europe. That’s way too expensive for me, but I am trying to put away as much pipe tobacco as my pocketbook can afford in preparation for the day that the uh, ah, sky falls in on us.
I’ve written on this subject before and have been called a Chicken Little. That’s okay with me. I have been called worse names starting with the word “Chicken.”
However, I’m trying to prepare for Tobaccogeddon. And, hey, if it never happens, then mayhaps I hedged a few price increases on my fav blends.
Thanks for the questions guys and I especially appreciate Russ’s clarity. He is a heck of a lot closer to the vicissitudes of pipe and cigar regulations than the Pipe Pundit.
I just smoke ‘em when I got ‘em.
Tobacco suffers the blight of social engineering like few other products. You can blame this on cigarettes, and do-gooders who like to concentrate on it due to the fact that its use constitutes “luxury” and cancer simultaneously. That’s all about cigarettes though, because that’s where the attention has been, and “tested”, and the debate dwells around cigarette use. Only by extension are cigars and pipes included in the equation.
You might think alcohol is nutritious or character-building with the way it is marketed- with negligible warnings. Drinking wine by extension makes you a “connoisseur” of something rare and special. Cigars and pipes both need that “rare and special” vibe/meme which quality booze, wine and even beer now enjoys. That’s a tall order, I know.
While I hesitate to invoke anything to do with the ongoing “culture wars” (knowing the destructive fallout surrounding them, I myself largely remain agnostic) finding a way to cast dispersions on the FDA is most in order.
That left/right divide is just the place where we get destroyed big-time. Odious (perceived or otherwise) characters like R Limbaugh and his cigars haven’t helped us a whole lot. Meanwhile many on the left will maintain on the point of their lives that the FDA is in the hands of corporations and does nothing to keep we consumers safe- especially when compared with Europe, which bans all sorts of substances the FDA does not, including GMOS.
My own perception is that the FDA is totally bogus; absolutely arbitrary. They have no interest in the welfare of the US consumer and at the same time will always defer to corporate interests, unless in the case of tobacco which is on the losing end of the social-engineering stick.
Note that in the last half-century or more, the FDA has given carte-blanche permission to an endless amount of products which probably should be illegal- with very little testing. To this day there are endless arguments about plastics and EMF-producing appliances, not to mention soaps, cleaning products, sweeteners and what-have-you. If one-tenth of the pressure exerted on tobacco was also applied to millions of other products, we’d no longer be wearing clothes, living in our houses, driving cars or buying the products we do.
The economy would collapse. Billions of internal combustion engines can gas us into unconsciousness and the planet to hell and back, but a tiny minority of disgruntled, logic-impaired do-gooders can get their panties in a bunch over nanny-state chicken-little-isms and exert useless legislation to the detriment of the rest of us.
The lawyerly-minded and actual attorneys must mount this argument. We all know the fact that restaurant/bar owners can not keep their doors open to a smoker-only clientele with smoker-only staff is clearly UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Let’s remember that “assault rifles” might as well be nutritious too.
Acquiescence to blind authority is how we became self-absorbed couch potatoes waiting for our next TV show. We get the Gov’t we deserve.