WHO says "Big Tobacco Is 'Poisoning Our Planet"

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

18 Fresh Claudio Cavicchi Pipes
12 Fresh Winslow Pipes
2 Fresh Wandi Riyadi Pipes
New Cigars
2 Fresh Kurt Balleby Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mar 1, 2014
3,661
4,964
Humans are also a planetary problem ?‍♂️
The population of the Earth can easily fit into a single city the size of Texas if everyone wanted to live in apartments (which the majority are just fine with).
Not to mention global population is already on decline (average birth rate globally is rapidly approaching neutral).
The only reason anything is going wrong is the mismanagement of a few bad actors causing mass pollution (corporate and government), the majority of the global population causes negligible environmental harm.
 

karam

Lifer
Feb 2, 2019
2,605
9,929
Basel, Switzerland
Cigarette filters are polluting, farming is overall terrible for the environment the way it’s done in many places. Hydrocarbons are terrible for the environment, our health, and world peace.

Successfully resisted trolling some of the posts under the OP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronv69 and jpmcwjr
Jan 30, 2020
2,327
7,682
New Jersey
SOME humans, mind.

'Tis only that the ones who do positive things never make the news.
In a less sarcastic take to my response, humans in general are detrimental to everything else on the planet. Generally speaking, as a species, we significantly alter the environments around us for the things we want outside of a very small indigenous population that’s still left around the world. For the most part, everything we do as modern humans is destructive to the rest of the environment around us.

I mentioned it in the other thread, but the argument could be made for any topic of current target. Coffee as an easy example but you can make a case for almost anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronv69

FurCoat

Lifer
Sep 21, 2020
10,250
96,602
North Carolina
There are still plenty who are resisting such entities. Hopefully the relatively silent resistors will prove to be the majority of us in the end.

But I suppose such statements as these give credence to those who keep saying that we are in a golden age of tobacco regarding price and relative availability; and that purchasing for the future is a wise endeavor.
I will not submit, I will not comply.
? WHO and the UN.
 

FurCoat

Lifer
Sep 21, 2020
10,250
96,602
North Carolina
Well, once their BS Plannedemic Treaty is signed, they'll be controlling the rest of us.

They'll just declare tobacco a "pandemic" and steamroll you. Not far-fetched since they already define tobacco use as a "disease"—such definition is right there in their papers.
And the treaty gives them the authority to use a foreign military to enforce their will. The same tactic the WHO used in Africa during the Ebola outbreak. The trial balloon has already been released.
 

FurCoat

Lifer
Sep 21, 2020
10,250
96,602
North Carolina
"7,000 toxic chemicals"??

It's the filters that's the problem. Gross and most likely toxic, at least aesthetically.
I don't miss the days of piles of cigarette butts littering parking lots. Looked like ant hills. I can't tell you how many butts I swept up in my younger days. People can be down right nasty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronv69 and Casual

olkofri

Lifer
Sep 9, 2017
8,175
15,014
The Arm of Orion
And the treaty gives them the authority to use a foreign military to enforce their will. The same tactic the WHO used in Africa during the Ebola outbreak. The trial balloon has already been released.
I kinda figured that the UNATCO wasn't just a silly trope in some silly old game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FurCoat
Status
Not open for further replies.