It is such a pleasure looking at pipe after George has applied his magic. How can you tell a Dibos stem from a Dunhill?? Dibos is light years better.
I would never dare to piss you off.
What's a Hoover?It's not George you have to worry about; it's Hoover.
Well George, I was wrong. I had to go review my notes...........
The patent # 1341418/20 led me to believe it was 1930's........... BUT I overlooked the "Dunhill Shell" nomenclature............. a 30's pipe would have a "Dunhill's Shell" (possessive) marking.
Those wartime pipes are tricky bastards, and trip me up everytime.
Sorry for the confusion............
I will offer a thesis on the "original" stem.
1943 saw vulcanite severely rationed.......... most went to the war effort. Most pipes produced during the war had horn stems. I've read (but have no proof) that Dunhill later would replace the horn stems with vulcanite after the war...........
I'm wondering if your stem was a genuine Dunhill replacement? I can imagine that they didn't spend a LOT of time on them, as I understand they did it as a courtesy......... Maybe that's why the tenon was a bit short?......... A quick and easy, as opposed to a true Dunhill fitment?
Many mysteries around these old pipes........... I sure do miss Mr. Loring..............