"Maybe mylar with a bad seal?"
Nope. My mistake, not realizing "mylar" was not synonymous with "cheap plastic bag tobacco comes in."
Nope. My mistake, not realizing "mylar" was not synonymous with "cheap plastic bag tobacco comes in."
Tins are vacuum sealed as well.I believe that if the bag is vacuum sealed no aging happens. You need air for the aging process to occur.
Don't confuse space with air. Just because a tin doesn't get smaller does not mean it can't have the same amount of air removed. Regardless, I really have no idea about the bio-chemistry of aging tobacco. The question I'd like to understand better is the realtionship of O2 with the aging process.I think the vacuum sealed thing is just a term that needs clarification. I am sure that tins and bags can be vaccuum sealed but in a tin, the rigidity of the walls means that SOME decent quantity of air will remain. In a bag that gets Vaccuum sealed where the bag is all hugged up on the tobacco there will be much less.
Really, it's a pretty straight-forward experiment, but it requires some advanced instrumentation. Mass spectrograph for before and after aging analysis and a gas analyzer for the gas profile in the sealed container with the tobacco.The person that figures this out will be a genius!
This isn't NASA. But for the sake of dialogue I will further clarify... I was referring to tins like McClelland, Pease, C&D, H&H, and SPC use. Not metal ones.Don't confuse space with air. Just because a tin doesn't get smaller does not mean it can't have the same amount of air removed.
Very interesting, thanks! Sounds like I was wrong about anaerobic aging.I found this article on G L Pease's web site. This may have the information that you are look for.