Well, he chose to live in abject poverty, letting his brother pay his lodgings and trading his paintings for food. He had this strange mix of priestly and artist mix of philosophies. Really, up until the invention of cameras, artists were needed to record the way people looked in portraits, and they were "kept" or patronized by the rich and royalty or even the church. Michelangelo would have been a someone who inspired Vincent, being in torment within himself between the animal self and "The Church." But, at the time, with art untethered from recording the way things look (because of the camera) and the lack of a church patronage, he had to just figure out what it was to be an artist at that time.
No, Being poor, Dutch, and wandering about the backwoods of France, in the Netherlands and Belgium, he would have been more likely to have smoked a pipe that was a precursor to Hilson... or just picked up broken clay pipes and repaired them himself.
Wasn't one of his pipes on display at one time, along with a painting.
No, Being poor, Dutch, and wandering about the backwoods of France, in the Netherlands and Belgium, he would have been more likely to have smoked a pipe that was a precursor to Hilson... or just picked up broken clay pipes and repaired them himself.
Wasn't one of his pipes on display at one time, along with a painting.