Allan wrote:
Again, I know there are lots of fans of 1Q and other bulk tobaccos here. So this is just one guy's opinion.
Bob
Well, some might argue with the phrase "very commercial," but, in a nutshell, yes. Lane and Stokkebye probably produce the lion's share of all tobaccos sold as "house" blends in tobacco shops. (This is also the case with Tinder Box blends.) I've been very disappointed in Stokkebye's offerings, but I think Lane produces many enjoyable tobaccos (including 1Q, which is, I believe, still the most popular aromatic in the United States). To my palate, though, these are more "generic" blends that simply don't use the best tobaccos or benefit much (if at all) from aging. IMO, they're meant for everyday, casual smoking. And, also IMO, Lane's blends are far better than any OTC drugstore blend you might find. (I can't recommend Stokkebye at all.) If you're looking for high-quality non-aromatic blends, though, or blends that will improve with age, I think you're better off going with a tinned blend.I guess by reading an earlier post, Lane and Stockabbye are very commercial pipe tobaccos?
Again, I know there are lots of fans of 1Q and other bulk tobaccos here. So this is just one guy's opinion.
Bob