Underrated and Recommended

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

rmbittner

Lifer
Dec 12, 2012
2,759
2,024
Allan wrote:
I guess by reading an earlier post, Lane and Stockabbye are very commercial pipe tobaccos?
Well, some might argue with the phrase "very commercial," but, in a nutshell, yes. Lane and Stokkebye probably produce the lion's share of all tobaccos sold as "house" blends in tobacco shops. (This is also the case with Tinder Box blends.) I've been very disappointed in Stokkebye's offerings, but I think Lane produces many enjoyable tobaccos (including 1Q, which is, I believe, still the most popular aromatic in the United States). To my palate, though, these are more "generic" blends that simply don't use the best tobaccos or benefit much (if at all) from aging. IMO, they're meant for everyday, casual smoking. And, also IMO, Lane's blends are far better than any OTC drugstore blend you might find. (I can't recommend Stokkebye at all.) If you're looking for high-quality non-aromatic blends, though, or blends that will improve with age, I think you're better off going with a tinned blend.
Again, I know there are lots of fans of 1Q and other bulk tobaccos here. So this is just one guy's opinion.
Bob

 
Status
Not open for further replies.