Tobacco Makers Must List Ingredients, Prove Safety Claims

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

New Cigars
84 Fresh Savinelli Pipes
18 Fresh Claudio Cavicchi Pipes
143 Fresh Peterson Pipes
36 Fresh Rattray's Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

organizedmadman

Can't Leave
Nov 8, 2011
313
0
41
Louisville, Ky
So this is interesting...
As seen this morning in Business Week: copied and pasted from article......

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-30/tobacco-makers-must-list-ingredients-prove-safety-claims
Tobacco companies will have to begin reporting the amount of unsafe chemicals in their products and prove their so-called lower-risk alternatives to smoking such as snuff are actually safer, U.S. regulators said.
The Food and Drug Administration moved today to implement pieces of a 2009 law giving the agency the authority to regulate tobacco products. The FDA released preliminary guidelines for the industry that it says can educate consumers on exactly what is in cigarettes, such as ammonia and formaldehyde, and police claims that certain tobacco products may be safer than others.
The agency will share information on chemical amounts with the public within a year, Lawrence Deyton, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, said in a telephone call with reporters. On the issue of less-risky tobacco items, the draft guidelines set up two categories: one with a higher evidence standard that lets companies claim less harm than cigarettes; and another with a lower standard that permits companies to market products as reducing exposure to unsafe ingredients.
“We are forging new territory to ensure that tobacco companies provide accurate information and do not mislead American consumers,” FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said in a statement. “We are committed to stopping such practices that may cause people to start or continue using tobacco products that could lead to preventable disease and death.”
93 Chemicals

The FDA released a list of 93 chemicals that tobacco makers would have to report the quantity of in their products. The FDA is studying how best to disseminate the information publicly.
“Most people do understand tobacco use is harmful,” Deyton said. “There are also studies that people don’t really understand why to the extent the various chemicals in tobacco are harmful.”
The agency said in the draft on reduced-risk products -- which include electronic cigarettes, tobacco lozenges, snuff and snus -- that it’s asking for scientific information, including research findings related to a manufacturer’s claim, and may request data comparing the product with cigarettes.
Products in the two categories will be asked to show reduced risk and a benefit to the health of tobacco and non- tobacco users before companies can market them as safer, according to the draft guidelines. The companies also could advertise the products as offering less exposure to harmful ingredients if they prove that future studies may reveal a reduction in disease and death when compared with cigarettes.
Snuff Warnings

Reynolds American Inc. (RAI) (RAI) and its American Snuff unit asked the FDA in July to change labels on smokeless products to: “WARNING: No tobacco product is safe, but this product presents substantially lower risks to health than cigarettes.” Current labels say the product isn’t a safe alternative to cigarettes.
Altria Group Inc. (MO) (MO), which owns Philip Morris USA and brands including Copenhagen and Skoal, wrote the agency “there is overwhelming scientific, medical and public health consensus that moist smokeless tobacco products” such as snuff or snus, “are substantially less hazardous than cigarettes.”
Snuff and snus are moist powder tobacco that goes under the lip either loose or in a packet.
Shares of Richmond, Virginia-based Altria gained less than 1 percent to $30.87 at the close in New York, while Winston- Salem, North Carolina-based Reynolds increased 1.2 percent to $41.46. Star Scientific Inc. (CIGX) (CIGX) fell 2.4 percent to $3.28.
Scientific Evidence

Star Scientific filed an application with FDA in February 2011 to market its snuff product Stonewall Moist-BDL. Star, based in Glenn Allen, Virginia, said in a statement then that it was the first FDA application for approval of a tobacco product.
Smokeless tobacco can cause mouth cancer, oral health diseases and nicotine addiction, according to the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 3.5 percent of U.S. adults used smokeless tobacco in 2009. Skoal held 25 percent of the market share the same year, followed by Copenhagen with 24 percent, according to the CDC.
Independent third parties should be required to assess the health effects of modified-risk tobacco products before companies submit applications for review to the FDA, the Institute of Medicine in Washington, which advises the nation on health matters, recommended in a December report.

 

clunk

Lurker
Apr 9, 2012
35
0
Now that would be interesting,very interesting indeed. There are some fine blended tobaccos that are a work of art, but there are just as many tobaccos made by people who bleach the colors out of tobacco with some real obnoxious chemicals to get the same results.
This idea i like.

 

spartan

Lifer
Aug 14, 2011
2,963
7
All knowledge is a double-edged sword. It must be used wisely.
Hopefully we can depend on nothing but the truth. The idea is sound. I am just worried on how heavy handed the FDA is going to play this.
Trace amounts of insects and poop are allowed in our food. Which is gross, but deemed harmless and allowed by the FDA. So trace amounts of harmful chemicals should be treated the same way. Depending on their potency.
I think if everyone plays by the rules this could be benificial to all. Keep your fingers crossed!

 

asteroid1

Might Stick Around
Sep 2, 2011
54
0
It would be more useful to have the country/farm of origin details displayed on pipe tobacco tins to make it possible to judge the quality of the tobacco before you buy it like you can with wine.

 

doctorthoss

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 6, 2011
618
10
Yeah, this is a regulatory movement I can get behind, so long as they don't go too far with it. I have deep problems with banning products -- but I wholeheartedly support forcing companies to disclose ingredients so we can make an informed choice.

 

captainbob

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 5, 2010
765
2
I am pasting a previous post that I made in an earlier Topic as I feel it is good information to repeat in this Topic:
"Out of Respect for you, especially in a Forum, I do not argue Politics. I will say that I wonder where all of you were when Congress passed the F.T.C.A. (Family Tobacco Control Act)? Maybe you were active and maybe you were oblivious. It no longer matters because the Act passed and is in the implementation phase. All that you have seen regarding ciggarettes is the phase they are implementing now. Pipe tobacco is next in the Law. Make no mistake about it. According to Craig Tarler of Cornell and Diehl, he told me if the Act passes (which it did) the FDA will be in Control of Tobacco. It is. He also stated that it will take four years and pipe tobacco (as we know it) will not exist. There will be no aromatics allowed other than Menthol (who smokes menthol pipe tobacco?). Each blend and each ingredient will be chemically analyzed by a laboratory at the manufacturers expense. It will apply to Imported as well as Domestic blends. This is one of the reasons that Imports are not what they used to be because they know the new Law will apply to them as well. That's all I got to say. I can't count the number of letters I wrote to my Representatives opposing this new Law robbing us of our Freedom. I felt I was alone, or at least greatly outnumbered, by the Anti-Smokers. If you are wondering what I am talking about, you can read the Law that was passed here: http://pipesmokersintelligencer.org/call-to-action/tobacco-control-act
Where are prices for pipe tobacco going? Check this out. It is an excerpt from the Act.
“SEC. 919. User fees.
“(a) Establishment of quarterly fee.—Beginning on the date of enactment of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, the Secretary shall in accordance with this section assess user fees on, and collect such fees from, each manufacturer and importer of tobacco products subject to this chapter. The fees shall be assessed and collected with respect to each quarter of each fiscal year, and the total amount assessed and collected for a fiscal year shall be the amount specified in subsection (b)(1) for such year, subject to subsection (c).
“(b) Assessment of user fee.—
“(1) Amount of assessment.—The total amount of user fees authorized to be assessed and collected under subsection (a) for a fiscal year is the following, as applicable to the fiscal year involved:
“(A) For fiscal year 2009, $85,000,000 (subject to subsection (e)).
“(B) For fiscal year 2010, $235,000,000.
“(C) For fiscal year 2011, $450,000,000.
“(D) For fiscal year 2012, $477,000,000.
“(E) For fiscal year 2013, $505,000,000.
“(F) For fiscal year 2014, $534,000,000.
“(G) For fiscal year 2015, $566,000,000.
“(H) For fiscal year 2016, $599,000,000.
“(I) For fiscal year 2017, $635,000,000.
“(J) For fiscal year 2018, $672,000,000.
“(K) For fiscal year 2019 and each subsequent fiscal year, $712,000,000."

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



 
Status
Not open for further replies.