Tobacco in Norway

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

36 Fresh Savinelli Pipes
12 Fresh Estate Pipes
3 Fresh Jared Coles Pipes
New Cigars
2 Fresh Brigham Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

stewartu

Starting to Get Obsessed
Apr 15, 2012
133
439
61
I am in Oslo on business and, as is my usual habit whenever visiting a new place, i like to drift by the local tobacco shops and compare what is on offer. This afternoon i went gy Sol Cigar, seemingly the only tobacconist in Oslo. Nice selection of pipes; dunhill, chacom, stanwell, peterson, and an assortment of others. Pricey but in the realm of reality.
Tobacco on the other hand, was outrageous by U.S. standards. 50 gram tins of peterson tobaccos were between 350 and 450 kroner. Thats somewhere between 55 and 70 bucks. Ouch.

 

andrew369

Starting to Get Obsessed
Mar 21, 2013
102
0
While taxes in Scandinavia may be a tad insane on tobacco it is contributing to some of the best social care in the world. I have a friend in Finland who is actually being paid to go to university, accomadation, fees everything covered by the government, as well as other things such as healthcare, social security etc. Some countries like here in Ireland though are just money grabbing scum, but that's politics.

 

protestantpiper

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 20, 2013
200
2
If they could do it here...they would. That would take me from about 1lb a month to 4oz real quick!

 

kashmir

Lifer
May 17, 2011
2,712
81
Northern New Jersey
That's insane! At those prices only the rich will enjoy their pipes. Or the poor who choose to give up food for tobacco. Hardly a fair and just system. And by the way, why aren't the people strong enough to take care of themselves? Are they so weak that only through government care they are able to survive? Invalids of the State, in my opinion.

 

andrew369

Starting to Get Obsessed
Mar 21, 2013
102
0
I don't think it is that they could not afford any of that stuff or are "invalids of the state", they are some of the richest economies in the world so can afford to give the people those services freeing up the amount of disposable income they have to buy other goods and services giving a tax revenue back to the government (such as ridiculously priced tobacco). It is a model of democratic socialism called the Nordic Model I think which works for them due to their wealth. Wouldn't work in other parts of the world like the US since average income is a fair bit lower. Such as the huge amount of public fear which sprung up over Obama Care. I think the safeguard of every person in society would be worth the bit extra in taxes especially if the people have the income to afford it. Bit scary to an outsider though alright. 8O

 

protestantpiper

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 20, 2013
200
2
What gives the government, theirs or ours, the right to tax anything beyond a normal sales tax? Is that not why our founding brethren threw English Tea into the Boston Harbor? We are willing to take so much more now, than then. I'm half a step away from trying to grow my own...

 

judcole

Lifer
Sep 14, 2011
7,945
48,707
Detroit
What gives the government, theirs or ours, the right to tax anything beyond a normal sales tax? Is that not why our founding brethren threw English Tea into the Boston Harbor?
.
Um - no. The colonists were upset not because of the tax per se, but because they had no representation in the Parliament that levied the taxes.
The rest of your post I won't address because it's politics, which is verboten here. The other part was history. :nana:

 

protestantpiper

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 20, 2013
200
2
Oh yeah. Sorry. No politics. The colonists were upset about representation, but taxes is why they threw tea in the harbor instead of chocolate...either way whether its guns, tobacco, or anything else it is taxed too much as it is.

 

lordnoble

Lifer
Jul 13, 2010
2,677
17
I could let this thread go and we could pretend to have a non-political discussion of tobacco taxes, but let's be honest. This thread is going to go downhill and hit the turbulent, murky political waters all of them do. So to "nip it in the bud", I'm closing. Thanks!
-Jason

 
Status
Not open for further replies.