First: Wine is an even more complicated mess-o-chemicals and long- and short-term reactions than tobacco is. Bottle aging of wine is a many-faceted process that cannot be accelerated by sticking a bottle in some sort of ultrasonic generator, surrounding it by rare earth magnets, or sticking it under a pyramid. It takes time for tannin polymerization to occur, and the micro-oxygenation that takes place through the closure is, and must be, a slow process. The cascade of reactions that result in beautifully aged wines, rather than bottles of old plonk, is a delicate dance that is easily disrupted if the bottles are subjected to heat, vibration, light, or if corks fail. It's possible that some sort of contrivance can help a wine that's tightly knit to open up a little more quickly, but that's more likely a result of aeration than anything else, and has nothing to do with the byproducts of aging. (My suspicion is that decanting the bottle and giving it some time to breath will have the same effect, albeit over a slightly longer time period.)
The same thing is true of tobaccos. Cooking it will certainly change it, volatilizing bound flavor and aroma compounds and distributing them more evenly in the mixture, hydrolyzing sugars, perhaps even caramelizing if the temperature is high enough. What comes out of the oven is likely going to be very different from what went in. But, it's not aged, nor will the aging process be accelerated as a result of doing this.
Nothing but time will achieve the results we love in aged blends. Save the pyramid, magnet and ultrasonic generator money for more tobacco and an Igloo cooler, and just put the stuff away for a while...