The Sale of Mac Baren Proved Costly

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

131 Fresh Peterson Pipes
New Accessories
3 Fresh Tom Eltang Pipes
5 Fresh Christian Ruetz Pipes
11 Fresh Vauen Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

eyjaygaming

Might Stick Around
Nov 29, 2022
71
461
Germany/Denmark
www.instagram.com
My TLDR:

The Danish company Halberg Group, which used to own Mac Baren Tobacco, lost about $33 million after selling the tobacco company to Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG) in 2024.

They sold Mac Baren for around $69 million, but Halberg had valued it much higher.
Because of that, they had to record a paper loss of about $20 million in their books.

Now to the article......
Translated from this Danish article (and DKK set to USD)

Hundreds of Millions Lost in Svendborg: The Sale of Mac Baren Proved Costly


Svendborg – The sale of the well-known tobacco factory Mac Baren has proven expensive for its former owner, Halberg in Svendborg.
The group’s new financial statements show that it has lost 238 million DKK (≈ 33 million USD) before tax over the past two years.


Production of pipe tobacco and nicotine pouches still continues at the Mac Baren factory in Svendborg, but by June next year, the owner will move production elsewhere.


The figure has only now become public due to a major accounting error.


The 200-employee company changed hands on 1 July 2024, and since then the new owner, Scandinavian Tobacco Group, has announced that it will close operations in Svendborg by June 2026 and move production to Assens and Holstebro.


When the sale was announced, the parties stated that Halberg would receive 535 million DKK (≈ 75 million USD) for the tobacco shares.
According to the new report, a later settlement reduced the price by 36 million DKK (≈ 5 million USD).


The final price has not been stated verbatim, but figures in Halberg A/S’s latest financial report strongly indicate that the group received 491 million DKK (≈ 69 million USD) in cash.


That’s a lot of money—but not as much as Halberg had previously valued Mac Baren at. In earlier financial statements, the shares had been recorded at a much higher value, so the difference between the book value and the actual price became a write-down, i.e., a loss on paper.


Less Wealthy Than Before


In total, Halberg had to write down 141 million DKK (≈ 20 million USD), which has made the historic group less wealthy than before the sale.
On the other hand, it now has a solid stack of cash instead of shares in Mac Baren.


Halberg Group’s CEO Jesper Uggerhøj explained that the write-down and loss had nothing to do with Mac Baren’s performance:


“Mac Baren was healthy and well-run. We sold the company for strategic reasons, as we believe that in the future, one needs to be significantly larger to compete in the tobacco industry,” he said.
“It’s true that the sale price was lower than the book value, but the selling price reflects what we could reach agreement on with the buyer,” said Jesper Uggerhøj.

In total, Mac Baren accounted for a loss of 166 million DKK (≈ 23 million USD) before tax across the 2023/24 and 2024/25 financial years for the Halberg Group.


Losses Elsewhere, Too


In addition to the loss from the sale, Halberg also faced unusually high expenses in other areas.
Its remaining operations — everything except Mac Baren — showed a loss of 111 million DKK (≈ 15 million USD) before tax in 2023/24.


The report gives no explanation for where that loss came from, and no external sources have been able to clarify it either.


Altogether, the two financial years have cost the owners a total loss of 238 million DKK (≈ 33 million USD) before tax.


Halberg Group remains very wealthy, so these losses have not threatened its survival.
In 2023, the company’s equity was 1.468 billion DKK (≈ 205 million USD), now reduced to 1.196 billion DKK (≈ 168 million USD)272 million DKK (≈ 38 million USD) less.


Accounting Error and Auditor Change


Although the sale agreement was made in June 2024, the financial consequences only became clear now.
The group’s 2023/24 report was completed after the sale, but the write-downs were not included.


In the new report, management admits that this was a significant error, and has therefore corrected numerous figures for 2023/24 in the updated report.


This correction increased the 2023/24 loss from 103 million DKK (≈ 14 million USD) to 225 million DKK (≈ 32 million USD) after tax.


Such a large accounting error is extremely rare in Denmark, especially for a company as large and reputable as Halberg.


Since 1997, Halberg’s accounts had been reviewed by Revisionsfirmaet Edelbo, also based in Svendborg.
After the mistake, nearly all companies in the group switched to competitor EY as auditor.


According to CEO Jesper Uggerhøj, the auditor change was not because of the accounting correction:


“We felt it was time for fresh eyes on our books. It’s not unusual for companies to change auditors from time to time,” he said.

Edelbo’s director Morten Pedersen declined to comment, citing client confidentiality.


The new auditor EY has also billed the company for “other services” amounting to 22 million DKK (≈ 3 million USD) during 2024/25.

Halberg Group Today

What remains in the Halberg Group includes:


  • The food company Løgismose (acquired in 2023),
  • Halberg Hotels,
  • Elka Rainwear, and
  • Halberg Properties, which invests in real estate.

In addition, over 400 million DKK (≈ 56 million USD) is invested in securities, and 122 million DKK (≈ 17 million USD) was held in cash at the end of the last financial year (April 30).


The company is satisfied with the performance of these divisions, which together produced a profit of 39 million DKK (≈ 5.5 million USD) before tax in 2024/25.
For the current year, Halberg expects revenue between 850 and 950 million DKK (≈ 119–133 million USD) and a profit of 35–50 million DKK (≈ 4.9–7 million USD) before tax.


The Halberg family’s fourth and fifth generationsOle Einar Halberg, Lee-Emilie Grøsfjeld Halberg, and Ann-Julie Grøsfjeld Halberg — together own 56 % of the shares and 25 % of the voting rights, while the Halberg Foundation owns the rest.
 

Fooberticus

Starting to Get Obsessed
Dec 14, 2019
105
1,272
Sounds like a Capital Loss Tax Ponzi to offset future gains elsewhere
My thought as well. Business losses of any kind are tax writeoffs, at least in the US, and profit and loss are accounted for separately. The typical strategy come tax season is to try to claim every loss you possibly can to minimize taxes on one side of the ledger, while touting your massive profits for the year to your investors on the other.

The Halbergs profited from this sale, they didn't lose anything except the legacy of their family business. It's the customers who will inevitably lose. It's just a matter of time before STG and Laudisi own everything, then one will absorb the other in a merger.
 

HeadMisfit

Can't Leave
Oct 15, 2025
455
316
It was going to happen. The family was extended into things that contraindicated being involved with tobacco.

And the loss is only imaginary as inflated prices are meaningless.

The value of the mac baren brand was influenced by continuous family ownership, location of the factory, and it's cultural history. And it's blend portfolio.

We can't lie and say they weren't becoming a sutliff type empire of hundreds of not the most indemand blends.

Stg isn't a product line but a gem supplier for actual brand names. If stg focused on the Mac baren label, they could have something to enjoy.

But they need adequate blending knowledge. Won't say the flooring was always great or consistent, but careful tweaking is needed
 

woodsroad

Lifer
Oct 10, 2013
14,318
28,354
SE PA USA
I'm sure Halberg explored spinning off the tobacco business and found that the value wasn't there. There was more to be made selling outright to STG. Also, I wonder if there were ties between the ownership of Halberg and STG. Are there financial and political connections between the two?
 

NookersTheCat

Part of the Furniture Now
Sep 10, 2020
746
3,686
NEPA
Also, I wonder if there were ties between the ownership of Halberg and STG. Are there financial and political connections between the two?
One of the wealthiest families and one of the largest conglomerates both of a country smaller than Wisconsin... yeah I'm pretty sure they bumped into each other at cocktail parties haha
 

jguss

Lifer
Jul 7, 2013
2,909
8,076
It’s not unusual for companies to change auditors from time to time

This statement is disingenuous at best. It’s not unheard of for public companies to change auditors but it is definitely unusual. And given that this happened in the immediate aftermath of a material adverse adjustment it is not unfair to infer it implies a loss of confidence by the client in the audit firm or the other way around.
 
Last edited:

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
18,335
33,308
47
Central PA a.k.a. State College
It’s not unusual for companies to change auditors from time to time

This statement is disingenuous at best. It’s not unheard of to change auditors but it is definitely unusual. And given that this happened in the immediate aftermath of a material adverse adjustment it strongly implies a loss of confidence by the client in the audit firm of the other way around.
I'll take your word on that. I have to admit this whole time I kept thinking what does that actually mean?
 

HawkeyeLinus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2020
6,648
47,082
Midwest
A lot to unpack and just not worth the time. It was "worth" what it sold for - what internal or other valuation the company had for what it was selling really doesn't mean all that much, so some of this is sort of misleading from the outset. They got $69m - the "write down" - so what - and of course how that worked and the implications aren't delved into. Halbergs don't own Mac Baren any more so the entire article is pretty much an irrelevancy.
 

VDL_Piper

Lifer
Jun 4, 2021
2,508
22,725
Springfield Nuclear Power Plant
Sounds like the auditor was the fall guy as its very difficult to imagine that a mistake of this magnitude was not known especially since the auditing firm had been doing the books for generations!!!! They would have known the books of the business intimately and the tax positions, this was a shell game to extract themselves from the tobacco industry.