a moderator threatened to shut down the thread in which the above comment appeared...twice...if the conversation continued down that tangent. i respect the moderators discretion to keep threads from degenerating or going off on some non topical direction.
still i have a hard time letting some comments just hang out there without taking them up on the implied invitation to engage with them. However, if the moderators want to lock this thread, that’s fine – I respect their discretion on this forum.
my argument against today's administrative state is not based on a harkening back to some simpler blissful horse and buggy past. nor is it based on a determination to burn down the entire federal govt. these are two of the typical answers to the argument that the federal govt is too big for its britches.
my bias against the big administrative state starts out with my bias towards liberty solutions to problems, especially economic or financial or business problems. everyone's got problems, but when we add and subtract them all together, they pretty much cancel each other out. it's a big mistake for the national govt to take sides in problems that are essentially self correcting. And it shouldn't surprise anyone whose side the govt normally takes.
Big govt ain’t a necessary adjunct to our modern economy or modern culture. In other words, our economy is modern, but big govt isn’t. big govt itself is a harkening back to the good days of kings and dictators. The public good is just a new and improved way to say divine right of kings. Another way to think of big govt is that we’ve wondered off on a tangent away from the liberty solutions method our founders handed off to us. Peeling back the layers of govt regulation ain’t a return to olden times; it’s a course correction.
still i have a hard time letting some comments just hang out there without taking them up on the implied invitation to engage with them. However, if the moderators want to lock this thread, that’s fine – I respect their discretion on this forum.
my argument against today's administrative state is not based on a harkening back to some simpler blissful horse and buggy past. nor is it based on a determination to burn down the entire federal govt. these are two of the typical answers to the argument that the federal govt is too big for its britches.
my bias against the big administrative state starts out with my bias towards liberty solutions to problems, especially economic or financial or business problems. everyone's got problems, but when we add and subtract them all together, they pretty much cancel each other out. it's a big mistake for the national govt to take sides in problems that are essentially self correcting. And it shouldn't surprise anyone whose side the govt normally takes.
Big govt ain’t a necessary adjunct to our modern economy or modern culture. In other words, our economy is modern, but big govt isn’t. big govt itself is a harkening back to the good days of kings and dictators. The public good is just a new and improved way to say divine right of kings. Another way to think of big govt is that we’ve wondered off on a tangent away from the liberty solutions method our founders handed off to us. Peeling back the layers of govt regulation ain’t a return to olden times; it’s a course correction.