that they don't make things like they used to is a great example of the survivor paradox. Basically we see the products that at their time where made to last or well made you know the ones that stick around and assume that they were a product of their time, instead of what's true that only quality lasts. My first experience with that was with music. Oh the music was so much better back in the x0's or the decade after that. Then actually researching what people listened to and realizing most popular music has always been kind of shitty with a few greats that are great even to people not born when they got recorded. I love talking to kids about the 80's and 80's and showing them some of the stuff that was on the radio a lot and that was more popular in terms of sales then the stuff that makes me so lucky to have grown up in a time when music was better. Back to the original point most of the pipes made back in the day are gone. They broke or no one cherished them enough to keep them or keep them in good shape. The pipes we get from then either lasted because they where made with quality or where just so much nicer and cherished that they got well taken care of and survived. They don't represent the standards of their day.I find myself agreeing with Mr. Pease a good deal here. He implies it, but I will say it directly: people have a tendency to get drunk off nostalgia. Make a fairly niche product that has a devoted fanbase, and good portion of them will eventually opine about how the product was better made during the days of their youth. Sometimes this is true, sometimes not. But I think the human memory has a way of sweetening certain reminisces beyond their actual quality.
For example, I have a soft spot for Smith & Wesson revolvers. If you go to, say, one of their social media pages where they showcase one of their newer revolvers, you'll almost always find a few boomers griping about trivial changes and make paeans to the old world craftmanship that apparently all the older wheelies were subject to, unlike the crass new guns of today. Some of these criticisms are valid, to be sure, but what animates them all, generally speaking, is not objective criticism, but a devotion to an exaggerated past that they unfairly compare the present to.
To offer a particular case from the example above, when S&W reintroduced their K-frame .357s, they fixed what were design flaws in the old models, namely, they beefed up the forcing cone (which reduces flame cutting) and used ball-detent lockup to keep the ejector rod more securely in place. Whatever one's opinions are on the new K-frames (and there are, believe me, very valid gripes to be had), any objective person would agree that those two things are mechanical improvements to a classic design. But the hardcore nostalgia fans refuse to believe ANY S&W revolver made after 1989 can be better than the ones they already own.
Nostalgia gets in the way of viewing things objectively. That is also true of pipes.
Pretty much same thing you said.
And to rant even more. I think one of the fuels of nostalgia is just that we survived most of the issues we had back then. And that takes some if not most of the punch out of the problems. Sure we starved and were broke but that doesn't matter because it never ruined or killed us so easy to forget when we remember the good times. I think one of the best examples in my life is the 80's. When people talk about how great they were, they forget the things like the threats of the cold war including the threats of nuclear devastation and the real threat that one little mistake could kill so many people. A computer glitch could make the Russians think we have attacked them. Reagan might secretly have dreamed of being the worlds biggest serial killer and punted the football (not a comment on him, but on the fact that knowing he could have wiped out the world as we know it with a button press is a good way to induce insomnia). But you know now that it's passed not such a big deal.