Daylight savings time would give you a sunrise time around 8:30am deep in December. I can’t imagine most people being thrilled when that time roles around.
^^^ This… split the hour and stay patGo back and look at the history of all of this and, assuming we're going to stop this nonsense, the choice should be Standard time. But, why not just split the difference and decide on a 30 minute shift?
Sure, nothing will be perfectly correct, except for some of Fall and Spring, then nothing is perfect now, and nothing we do is perfect in any case.
Yes, as are we all.I'm all for more daylight.
They already tried this in the '70s. People HATED it and it was an abysmal failure. https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/03/18/daylight-saving-seventies-history/
That was my first thought... What F'ing moron came up with that name?At this point, I don't give a fusty ruck, though if a change is made, make it Standard Time.
What I do find obnoxious is the title of the bill. Nothing Congress has done or ever will do will affect the amount of sunshine the world receives. So sunshine doesn't need protection, at least not due to manmade constructs such as hours.
I suspect a sneaky manipulative member of congress, counting on a large percentage of voters and fellow travelers to be under the impression it actually produces more daylight.That was my first thought... What F'ing moron came up with that name?