Stonehaven Tins?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chasing Embers

Captain of the Black Frigate
Nov 12, 2014
45,243
119,230
I agree CM. Looks like a last minute decision, but without a doubt it's the real deal. We'll be seeing it again as the supply spreads out.
Or worse with FDA graffiti. :(

 

hawky454

Lifer
Feb 11, 2016
5,338
10,234
Austin, TX
Weird, I always wondered why I've never seen a Stonehaven tin but it sounds like they used to tin it? Cool. I do like Stonehaven but I have plenty I'll leave you all to it.

 

codecreatively

Can't Leave
Sep 17, 2014
329
2
I saw these pop up and thought they were fake too. Looks legit, the label on the back would be more difficult to fake. Rather than cut new dies for rounded edged labels, they're just using the same 8oz bag labels and changing the ounces. I saw some with the vertical writing on the left edge normally seen on the bags. Definitely a rush job.

 

iamn8

Lifer
Sep 8, 2014
4,248
16
Moody, AL
Have to keep in mind, this was from a B&M. Pricing online would be substantially less.
Counterfeiting would be expensive as hell. Can't fake the product and these are sealed tins.

 

mrenglish

Lifer
Dec 25, 2010
2,220
72
Columbus, Ohio
How about a picture of an opened tin? Lets see what is really on the inside. I kind of like the idea of a tinned version. After a few days in the tobacco pouch, it begins to lose its topping. A tin would fix that. An expensive fix, for sure.

 

iamn8

Lifer
Sep 8, 2014
4,248
16
Moody, AL
After opening the tin and smoking a bowl, I can say without a doubt it's Stonehaven :)
Yeah the labels, that little disc, and even the cupcake like paper seems odd. What a strange company they are. I'd LOVE to tour their facility. I can't complain though. The tobacco is world class, the rest isn't too important.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.