Spotting Replacement Dunhill Stems (pre-1970)

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

georged

Lifer
Mar 7, 2013
6,088
16,690
This is for you oldie Dunhill shoppers.

The info applies from the late(ish) 1920s through the late 60's / early 70's for all but special orders, specialty pipes, giants, etc.

The following pics show an authentic stem for a 1940's model 475 (as a reference), and a good copy and a bad copy for the same pipe---a 1956 475.

The authentic one will NOT fit the 1956 pipe---the shank & overall size of the two pipes are different (the '56 is slightly larger)---but since pointing out the "tells" of a replacement stem is the point of this thread, that doesn't matter.

The first thing to look for and the easiest to spot is the crisp 45-degree angle between the tenon and shank face. Before the 1970's, Dunhill never used a square or rounded cut here.



P1050748.jpg



Next is the button's front-on profile. Legit Dunhill stems are always a flattened oval with rounded ends NOT Stewie Griffin points.

P1050754.jpg



The overall side-taper rate is also important. Notice that the stem on the left is neither straight nor fish tail, but somewhere in between. Older Dunhill's were pretty strict about being one or the other. (No F/T stamp means almost (but not quite) parallel-sided for the full length of the stem, and having the F/T stamp means an unambiguous bite-zone flare or "trumpet" shape when viewed from the top.)

All these are non F/T stems.

Also, both the dot placement (it's too close to the shank) and the dot size (it's too large) are wrong on the left one. Those two things vary enough from specimen to specimen that there's no standard, however. You just have to look at enough authentic pipes that after a while an estate pipe's dot either "looks right" or it doesn't.

Also, though not definitive, but helpful, is the COLOR of the dot.

Notice that the one on the right is very faintly---but distinctly---yellow-ish. Sort of a translucent cream color. That's because a percentage of legit oldies had their cellulose dots do that from age.

Because I like the look, I "fake" it with walrus ivory (the only other option is to use cellulose and wait 50+ years and hope you handled the pipe in whatever ways caused SOME Dunhill dots to do that.)

Anyway, if the dot is a translucent-ish cream color, the stem is almost guaranteed to be original. Remember that the reverse is NOT true, however.


P8286405.jpg



Finally, the side profile of the button.

It is very difficult to get right, so almost never is on replacements.

Rather than try to describe the characteristics, I'll just let the picture do the talking.


P1050769.jpg



PS --- the side view of the entire stem is the most basic tell of all---Dunhill NEVER did the duckbill thing---but anyone reading this almost certainly already knows that. I wanted to cover the more subtle stuff.
 

OzPiper

Lifer
Nov 30, 2020
6,866
37,098
72
Sydney, Australia
This is for you oldie Dunhill shoppers.

The info applies from the late(ish) 1920s through the late 60's / early 70's for all but special orders, specialty pipes, giants, etc.

The following pics show an authentic stem for a 1940's model 475 (as a reference), and a good copy and a bad copy for the same pipe---a 1956 475.

The authentic one will NOT fit the 1956 pipe---the shank & overall size of the two pipes are different (the '56 is slightly larger)---but since pointing out the "tells" of a replacement stem is the point of this thread, that doesn't matter.

The first thing to look for and the easiest to spot is the crisp 45-degree angle between the tenon and shank face. Before the 1970's, Dunhill never used a square or rounded cut here.



View attachment 165710



Next is the button's front-on profile. Legit Dunhill stems are always a flattened oval with rounded ends NOT Stewie Griffin points.

View attachment 165711



The overall side-taper rate is also important. Notice that the stem on the left is neither straight nor fish tail, but somewhere in between. Older Dunhill's were pretty strict about being one or the other. (No F/T stamp means almost (but not quite) parallel-sided for the full length of the stem, and having the F/T stamp means an unambiguous bite-zone flare or "trumpet" shape when viewed from the top.)

All these are non F/T stems.

Also, both the dot placement (it's too close to the shank) and the dot size (it's too large) are wrong on the left one. Those two things vary enough from specimen to specimen that there's no standard, however. You just have to look at enough authentic pipes that after a while an estate pipe's dot either "looks right" or it doesn't.

Also, though not definitive, but helpful, is the COLOR of the dot.

Notice that the one on the right is very faintly---but distinctly---yellow-ish. Sort of a translucent cream color. That's because a percentage of legit oldies had their cellulose dots do that from age.

Because I like the look, I "fake" it with walrus ivory (the only other option is to use cellulose and wait 50+ years and hope you handled the pipe in whatever ways caused SOME Dunhill dots to do that.)

Anyway, if the dot is a translucent-ish cream color, the stem is almost guaranteed to be original. Remember that the reverse is NOT true, however.


View attachment 165712



Finally, the side profile of the button.

It is very difficult to get right, so almost never is on replacements.

Rather than try to describe the characteristics, I'll just let the picture do the talking.


View attachment 165713



PS --- the side view of the entire stem is the most basic tell of all---Dunhill NEVER did the duckbill thing---but anyone reading this almost certainly already knows that. I wanted to cover the more subtle stuff.
Thanks @georged
Thats's GOLD
 
  • Like
Reactions: jguss

georged

Lifer
Mar 7, 2013
6,088
16,690
Is it me or is that dot a different size as well?

Dot size varied quite a bit over time within the same shape/model/size.

I always figured Dunhill just bought celluloid rod in batches that were "close enough" (about 6 thousandths either side of a some standard / average target number) and the entire batch was that size. No biggie at all, shop-wise. Changing a drill bit was the only factory change necessary, and only when the batch ran out.

I personally like the ones on the small(er) side because they look more elegant.
 

guylesss

Can't Leave
May 13, 2020
323
1,158
Brooklyn, NY
This is absolutely invaluable, George!

Very fortunately "good" copies are extremely difficult and time-consuming to make, and bad copies seem the norm with replacement stems (at least until the market in "estate" pipes began to involve serious money).

The problem of connoisseurship that remains, however, is that Dunhill itself did a lively business for decades (and indeed until comparatively recently) in pipe repair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jguss

georged

Lifer
Mar 7, 2013
6,088
16,690
The problem of connoisseurship that remains, however, is that Dunhill itself did a lively business for decades (and indeed until comparatively recently) in pipe repair.

They did indeed.

Surprisingly, Dunhill's own repairs are usually easy to spot. "Invisibility" was not something people cared about back in the day. A reasonable looking, high quality (reliable) repair that got the job done was apparently all that mattered.
 

buroak

Lifer
Jul 29, 2014
2,127
1,033
NW Missouri
@georged, does the white dot rod ever extend into the airway on an authentic stem (or at least an authentic stem with its original dot)? I am working on a 1940 US market pipe. The stem looks right, but the tenon face is a little odd (I will get a photo of that when I can), and the rod is plainly visible inside the airway at the 1 o’clock position as photographed.IMG_3412.jpeg
 

georged

Lifer
Mar 7, 2013
6,088
16,690
I have seen dot rod extend into the airway on factory originals. It's how the Black Dot Myth started, in fact. (The rod soaks up tars & etc over time and white eventually turns black)

The stem in the pic does not look original, though. Stem face tear-out like that was (and still is) a fundamental no-no on a collectable grade pipe. Not only would Dunhill QA never pass it, but their equipment was too rigid, their blades kept too sharp, and their rubber too high quality to do it if they wanted to.
 

buroak

Lifer
Jul 29, 2014
2,127
1,033
NW Missouri
I have seen dot rod extend into the airway on factory originals. It's how the Black Dot Myth started, in fact. (The rod soaks up tars & etc over time and white eventually turns black)

The stem in the pic does not look original, though. Stem face tear-out like that was (and still is) a fundamental no-no on a collectable grade pipe. Not only would Dunhill QA never pass it, but their equipment was too rigid, their blades kept too sharp, and their rubber too high quality to do it if they wanted to.
Dang, you didn’t need a better photo after all. I wasn’t even registering the stem face. I fixed onto the face of the tenon. The rest of it looked right, from the shape, to the proportions, on down to the button.

I don’t think it can be chalked up to wartime production, either. I’ll still try to get some better photos. The stem face appearance may be more due to grime than manufacturing.
 

buroak

Lifer
Jul 29, 2014
2,127
1,033
NW Missouri
Here are some better photos with less grime. The shank face under the gunk is smooth. The tenon still looks off, and the transition, while correct in shape, looks and feels strange. The feel has give to it, and the discoloration is strange. In the final photos there is a spot that looks like separation where the tenon transition meets the shank face.

I could have done better getting the focus right…
IMG_3413.jpegIMG_3415.jpegIMG_3414.jpeg
 

georged

Lifer
Mar 7, 2013
6,088
16,690
10-4 on it was grunge and not tear-out.

That fact plus the new pics make me think the stem is original.

Not sure why the 45-degree tenon/shank face intersection looks like clay (?!) but the button is right, which is the toughest thing to copy. (The small step on the end of the tenon would be easy to "add" to any stem, so that doesn't figure into it.)
 

buroak

Lifer
Jul 29, 2014
2,127
1,033
NW Missouri
Thanks! The strangeness of the tenon face and the even stranger appearance of the tenon-shank face transition were such niggling things in part because the button looked so spot-on. Unfortunately, the best non-fishtail stem I have for reference is a rough horn version from later in the war. I am amazed how well Dunhill executed their stem design in horn, but it still is limited as a tool for comparison. At least I can be certain of the horn stem’s authenticity.
 

newbroom

Lifer
Jul 11, 2014
6,379
10,018
North Central Florida
I had Ed Shulte make me a stem for my ONLY Dunhill, a #656 Shellbriar that had a replacement stem already, but it had no dot. I sent the pipe to Ed and it cost me almost $80 including shipping etc. to get the new stem, which he sent to me along with the original replacement stem. Unfortunately, he had simply modified the mortise to accept his new 'Dunill Authorized' replacement, thus rendering the original replacement useless on this pipe. I'd only paid $47 bucks for the pipe to start with. Lessons learned.
The new authorized stem has no shoulder near the junction. It is however, nicely formed and decent quality.