Never thought of it that way but the line from bowl to shank at the top makes it look that way. It also looks dirty in the picture :-(.Th
Nice! This looks very close to mine. I think yours is an bent egg, mine is a bent billiard?
I love the bent egg shape!Never thought of it that way but the line from bowl to shank at the top makes it look that way. It also looks dirty in the picture :-(.
My old dunhills are quite sturdy, elegant looking, and consistently great smokers. Stems are super comfortable. I’ve never owned a new Dunhill though I’d like to for comparison.Beautiful pipes. At least ones here, looks as good as Peterson. Most Dunhill look rather delicate to me.
You can see why they didn’t put a metal band on this one, I love the finish and the stem.Here is my other Ferndown (after the REO Apple I already posted photo of earlier above). This one is an unsmoked bent billiard in Vintage finish with Cumberland stem. The Vintage finish (smooth dark chestnut) is a darker version of Les' Tudor Root finish, and was the predecessor of the REO finish (smooth reddish/brown). Vintage finishes are not often found, and the other thing I love about this one is that the size is perfect for my hand. This one will be THE Ferndown in my pipe collection and I definitely plan to smoke it alot once I decide what blend of tobacco I want to dedicate it to...
View attachment 208911
Think you meant to post this in the WAYS thread...Veermaster with added Perique and Kentucky in a 40s Barling Bulldog
View attachment 209616
Yea, senior momentThink you meant to post this in the WAYS thread...
I find the newer Dunhill's to be more solid/robust, compared to some of my older ones. I don't think they're as well made as the older ones, either. Personally prefer the older ones.My old dunhills are quite sturdy, elegant looking, and consistently great smokers. Stems are super comfortable. I’ve never owned a new Dunhill though I’d like to for comparison.
I just love the older Dunhills, especially the pre-1950 Patent Shells -- the craggy finish on those is great and the bowl sizes on those earlier pipes are (for me personally) perfect. Light in the hand and sweet smoking...I find the newer Dunhill's to be more solid/robust, compared to some of my older ones. I don't think they're as well made as the older ones, either. Personally prefer the older ones.
Completely agree.I just love the older Dunhills, especially the pre-1950 Patent Shells -- the craggy finish on those is great and the bowl sizes on those earlier pipes are (for me personally) perfect. Light in the hand and sweet smoking...
Ha! Yeah, I'd thought the same too.Question: If Ferndown is the name of Les Wood’s mansion, I assume this means he is very well off and made pipes for the love of it, not to feed his family?
Both are Beauts!View attachment 209723
Cumberland stem. Was hard to get a better photo.
View attachment 209724
14 carat gold band.
Did you check pipedia?Trying to figure the approximate date of my Ferndown. Anyone know what year Mr. Wood and co. changed over from the old LJS logo font on the stem to the later LJ&S? (Hope this isn’t a repeat question from this thread, somewhere in the past.) Thanks for any input here.