Send Letters to Your Representatives: Here's a Sample

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

36 Fresh Nørding Pipes
30 Fresh AKB Meerschaum Pipes
12 Fresh Moonshine Pipes
6 Fresh Mastro Geppetto Pipes
9 Fresh Brebbia Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

starship

Starting to Get Obsessed
Aug 23, 2025
112
752
Summerville SC
I've drafted a one-page letter that can be emailed to all of our political representatives. This one has an American slant, but folks can swap that part out to mention history/culture of your own countries. Feel free to copy and paste it in a draft to your elected officials. Don't forget about local politicians as well.


Dear [ ],

I am writing to urge you to reconsider policies surrounding the taxation and regulation of pipe and cigar tobacco. As a passionate advocate for the preservation of American traditions and personal freedoms, I believe there is a compelling case for recognizing pipe and cigar tobacco as distinct from other tobacco products, especially when it comes to their health risks, cultural significance, and economic impact.

First and foremost, research indicates that pipe and cigar tobacco carries significantly lower health risks compared to cigarettes and vaping. According to a 2018 study published in Tobacco Control, the use of cigars and pipes has a markedly lower incidence of lung disease and cardiovascular issues when compared to regular cigarette use. This is due to the absence of many harmful chemicals found in mass-produced cigarettes and the fact that pipe and cigar smokers don’t inhale the smoke. Another study from the National Institute on Drug Abuse supports these findings, noting that while no form of tobacco is entirely without risk, the exposure to toxins is much lower for pipe and cigar users than for those who smoke cigarettes or use e-cigarettes.

Additionally, the tobacco in pipes and cigars is often free from the additives and flavorings that contribute to the harmful effects of modern cigarettes. Many of the chemicals in cigarette tobacco are linked to serious health issues, but these chemicals are not typically present in pure pipe and cigar tobaccos. Therefore, it is not only reasonable but necessary to distinguish between the different forms of tobacco use and regulate them accordingly.

Beyond the health considerations, we must also recognize the deep cultural and historical significance that tobacco has in the United States. Tobacco farming and the artistry of hand-rolling cigars and crafting premium pipe tobaccos are deeply ingrained in American heritage. These practices have contributed to the development of local economies, particularly in states like Kentucky, Virginia, and North Carolina, where the tobacco industry has been a pillar of agriculture for centuries. Furthermore, pipe and cigar smoking has long been considered an artform, with enthusiasts cultivating a refined appreciation for different tobaccos, blends, and smoking techniques. This is part of the broader narrative of American craftsmanship and tradition, which should be preserved and respected.

Given these considerations, I strongly encourage you to advocate for the following measures:

  1. Lower taxes on pipe and cigar tobacco that is free from harmful additives and chemicals.
  2. Recognize the lower health risks associated with pipe and cigar smoking compared to cigarettes and vaping.
  3. Support policies that preserve the cultural legacy of tobacco use in the United States, encouraging the continued production of artisanal and small-batch tobaccos.
I believe that a balanced approach to tobacco regulation—one that acknowledges the unique nature of pipe and cigar tobacco—would benefit both consumers and the economy. By preserving the integrity of American traditions while addressing modern health concerns, we can create a policy that respects individual choice without imposing unnecessary burdens.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and hope that you will consider these points in your upcoming legisla

I've drafted a one-page letter that can be emailed to all of our political representatives. This one has an American slant, but folks can swap that part out to mention history/culture of your own countries. Feel free to copy and paste it in a draft to your elected officials. Don't forget about local politicians as well.


Dear [ ],

I am writing to urge you to reconsider policies surrounding the taxation and regulation of pipe and cigar tobacco. As a passionate advocate for the preservation of American traditions and personal freedoms, I believe there is a compelling case for recognizing pipe and cigar tobacco as distinct from other tobacco products, especially when it comes to their health risks, cultural significance, and economic impact.

First and foremost, research indicates that pipe and cigar tobacco carries significantly lower health risks compared to cigarettes and vaping. According to a 2018 study published in Tobacco Control, the use of cigars and pipes has a markedly lower incidence of lung disease and cardiovascular issues when compared to regular cigarette use. This is due to the absence of many harmful chemicals found in mass-produced cigarettes and the fact that pipe and cigar smokers don’t inhale the smoke. Another study from the National Institute on Drug Abuse supports these findings, noting that while no form of tobacco is entirely without risk, the exposure to toxins is much lower for pipe and cigar users than for those who smoke cigarettes or use e-cigarettes.

Additionally, the tobacco in pipes and cigars is often free from the additives and flavorings that contribute to the harmful effects of modern cigarettes. Many of the chemicals in cigarette tobacco are linked to serious health issues, but these chemicals are not typically present in pure pipe and cigar tobaccos. Therefore, it is not only reasonable but necessary to distinguish between the different forms of tobacco use and regulate them accordingly.

Beyond the health considerations, we must also recognize the deep cultural and historical significance that tobacco has in the United States. Tobacco farming and the artistry of hand-rolling cigars and crafting premium pipe tobaccos are deeply ingrained in American heritage. These practices have contributed to the development of local economies, particularly in states like Kentucky, Virginia, and North Carolina, where the tobacco industry has been a pillar of agriculture for centuries. Furthermore, pipe and cigar smoking has long been considered an artform, with enthusiasts cultivating a refined appreciation for different tobaccos, blends, and smoking techniques. This is part of the broader narrative of American craftsmanship and tradition, which should be preserved and respected.

Given these considerations, I strongly encourage you to advocate for the following measures:

  1. Lower taxes on pipe and cigar tobacco that is free from harmful additives and chemicals.
  2. Recognize the lower health risks associated with pipe and cigar smoking compared to cigarettes and vaping.
  3. Support policies that preserve the cultural legacy of tobacco use in the United States, encouraging the continued production of artisanal and small-batch tobaccos.
I believe that a balanced approach to tobacco regulation—one that acknowledges the unique nature of pipe and cigar tobacco—would benefit both consumers and the economy. By preserving the integrity of American traditions while addressing modern health concerns, we can create a policy that respects individual choice without imposing unnecessary burdens.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and hope that you will consider these points in your upcoming legislative decisions.



Copied the text into a word file, and BOOKMARKED the site. Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Briarcutter

HeadMisfit

Can't Leave
Oct 15, 2025
496
349
Lol writing letters is meaningless unless the letters are about a specific political topic that is a "lynchpoint" for that persons political party.

I discovered a corporation that was defrauding the government of canada. Sending them proof of the companies tax evasion was meaningless to them.

For some reason the canadian company using fake addresses to file business documents was acceptable, despite against canadian law. Having people send membership fees to greece in the form of giftcards was acceptable...

And the american FBI did not care that the company was filing fake business documents in the united states by using the names and addresses of dead people . I mean, if "james jones" dies in 2008 in alabama, he should not be filing business incorporation doucemnts in mississippie or california in 2020.
 

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
18,516
33,676
47
Central PA a.k.a. State College
They seek groups of voters. We're sadly too small in number. The cigar lobbyist my wife worked with in Maryland was surprised there were still active pipe smokers. Lobbyists can force legislative change, individuals rarely do.

In Maryland, the top submissions (email/letters/calls) my wife received was for:
1. 2nd Amendment rights
2. Legalizing gay marriage (that passed)
3. Transgender rights

Her job was to inform the Senator on how many communications were received. He never saw or read any himself (several Senators). That's how things work at the state level.
You reminded me of one of the weirder experiences I had writing congressmen and senators I had almost 20 years ago. I've written quite a few letters and you often get back a generic form letter stamped by an intern (or staff). One time I actually had a shockingly honest and thoughtful back and fourth with a politician in another state. Was shocked that he read the letter and took the time to get back to me. I still wonder how that happened. Fun thing though I think it gave him a chance to vent about his job the nature of his job.
I made a suggestion about one the issues he was tackling and saying how ineffective the methods he wanted to use were and what I thought would be not only more humane but effective way to deal with the issue. His response was basically I was probably right but that sadly the people I would effect the most are literally the people who give him the biggest campaign contributions.
One of my few regrets is that I lost those letters in a move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThermionicScott