Send Letters to Your Representatives: Here's a Sample

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

BooksBassBriars

Might Stick Around
Feb 9, 2025
66
204
Hudson Valley, New York
I've drafted a one-page letter that can be emailed to all of our political representatives. This one has an American slant, but folks can swap that part out to mention history/culture of your own countries. Feel free to copy and paste it in a draft to your elected officials. Don't forget about local politicians as well.


Dear [ ],

I am writing to urge you to reconsider policies surrounding the taxation and regulation of pipe and cigar tobacco. As a passionate advocate for the preservation of American traditions and personal freedoms, I believe there is a compelling case for recognizing pipe and cigar tobacco as distinct from other tobacco products, especially when it comes to their health risks, cultural significance, and economic impact.

First and foremost, research indicates that pipe and cigar tobacco carries significantly lower health risks compared to cigarettes and vaping. According to a 2018 study published in Tobacco Control, the use of cigars and pipes has a markedly lower incidence of lung disease and cardiovascular issues when compared to regular cigarette use. This is due to the absence of many harmful chemicals found in mass-produced cigarettes and the fact that pipe and cigar smokers don’t inhale the smoke. Another study from the National Institute on Drug Abuse supports these findings, noting that while no form of tobacco is entirely without risk, the exposure to toxins is much lower for pipe and cigar users than for those who smoke cigarettes or use e-cigarettes.

Additionally, the tobacco in pipes and cigars is often free from the additives and flavorings that contribute to the harmful effects of modern cigarettes. Many of the chemicals in cigarette tobacco are linked to serious health issues, but these chemicals are not typically present in pure pipe and cigar tobaccos. Therefore, it is not only reasonable but necessary to distinguish between the different forms of tobacco use and regulate them accordingly.

Beyond the health considerations, we must also recognize the deep cultural and historical significance that tobacco has in the United States. Tobacco farming and the artistry of hand-rolling cigars and crafting premium pipe tobaccos are deeply ingrained in American heritage. These practices have contributed to the development of local economies, particularly in states like Kentucky, Virginia, and North Carolina, where the tobacco industry has been a pillar of agriculture for centuries. Furthermore, pipe and cigar smoking has long been considered an artform, with enthusiasts cultivating a refined appreciation for different tobaccos, blends, and smoking techniques. This is part of the broader narrative of American craftsmanship and tradition, which should be preserved and respected.

Given these considerations, I strongly encourage you to advocate for the following measures:

  1. Lower taxes on pipe and cigar tobacco that is free from harmful additives and chemicals.
  2. Recognize the lower health risks associated with pipe and cigar smoking compared to cigarettes and vaping.
  3. Support policies that preserve the cultural legacy of tobacco use in the United States, encouraging the continued production of artisanal and small-batch tobaccos.
I believe that a balanced approach to tobacco regulation—one that acknowledges the unique nature of pipe and cigar tobacco—would benefit both consumers and the economy. By preserving the integrity of American traditions while addressing modern health concerns, we can create a policy that respects individual choice without imposing unnecessary burdens.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and hope that you will consider these points in your upcoming legislative decisions.
 

ssjones

Moderator
Staff member
May 11, 2011
19,182
13,667
Covington, Louisiana
postimg.cc
You would want to send letters to your state officials for state taxes - the Senate & House.
It gets their attention if you send during their legislative session (example Maryland runs from June to April)
Get it in front of folks in the committee, all of them, tax bills would start in the Ways and Means Committee, your local rep may or may not be on that committee. If you don't grab the committee's attention early, it will never make it to sponsorship (unless your local rep has heavy influence and gets a lot of letters)
 

BooksBassBriars

Might Stick Around
Feb 9, 2025
66
204
Hudson Valley, New York
Thanks for the insight and nuance! Very helpful.
You would want to send letters to your state officials for state taxes - the Senate & House.
It gets their attention if you send during their legislative session (example Maryland runs from June to April)
Get it in front of folks in the committee, all of them, tax bills would start in the Ways and Means Committee, your local rep may or may not be on that committee. If you don't grab the committee's attention early, it will never make it to sponsorship (unless your local rep has heavy influence and gets a lot of letters)
 

BooksBassBriars

Might Stick Around
Feb 9, 2025
66
204
Hudson Valley, New York
You would want to send letters to your state officials for state taxes - the Senate & House.
It gets their attention if you send during their legislative session (example Maryland runs from June to April)
Get it in front of folks in the committee, all of them, tax bills would start in the Ways and Means Committee, your local rep may or may not be on that committee. If you don't grab the committee's attention early, it will never make it to sponsorship (unless your local rep has heavy influence and gets a lot of letters)
I just sent letters to all 35 members of my state Ways and Means committee.
 

ssjones

Moderator
Staff member
May 11, 2011
19,182
13,667
Covington, Louisiana
postimg.cc
I just sent letters to all 35 members of my state Ways and Means committee.
My wife spent 25 years as Chief of Staff for Maryland state officials, she read, collated and forwarded these letters and emails.

A few emails is a waste of time. A small number of mailed letters might get in front of an elected official. Emails just get filed, until a substantive amount of collected.
 

HawkeyeLinus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2020
6,154
43,231
Midwest
I think anyone should advocate appropriately for anything they are passionate about - so good for you!

Having said that, I think coming at it primarily from a viewpoint of suggesting expertise and/or consensus and/or this or that study says "x" concerning health risks is a nonstarter - that ship sailed a long time ago, IMO, it's already regulated by the federal government on that basis and I don't think if it is read anyone would get too far into it with that argument starter being the focus.

Al has given you good advice re state level advocacy.
 

Richmond B. Funkenhouser

Plebeian Supertaster
Dec 6, 2019
5,400
24,593
Dixieland
I emailed a congressman once and got help with an issue I was dealing with. It can work.

She had one of her people call me, then she called the agency I was dealing with and resolved my problem.

It shocked me.

I'm sure that was an example of the exception, and not the rule.

At the end of the day, these people don't care about us... And they really don't care about pipe tobacco.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Briar Lee

ssjones

Moderator
Staff member
May 11, 2011
19,182
13,667
Covington, Louisiana
postimg.cc
I emailed a congressman once and got help with an issue I was dealing with. It can work.

She had one of her people call me, then she called the agency I was dealing with and resolved my problem.

It shocked me.

I'm sure that was an example of the exception, and not the rule.

At the end of the day, these people don't care about us... And they really don't care about pipe tobacco.
Oh sure, the good ones do great constituent work, that's different. Most of my wife's job was helping residents in her area.

Getting their attention to introduce legislation to change state laws, that's a different story.

My congressman down here was very helpful with a banking issue we experienced after the move.

Just make sure you know if you have a Federal or state issue, that will determine who to contact.
 

Briar Lee

Lifer
Sep 4, 2021
5,372
15,336
Humansville Missouri
Don’t neglect a polite phone call.

I was an elected member of our local school board 25 years ago.

Most of the calls I got were parents wanting us to hire more coaches for the boy’s football team.

The one I acted on was a school cook who called me and wanted me to go down to the school kitchen where the temperature was 120 degrees.:)

It took three years, but I air conditioned the kitchen.

Every representative worth their salt wants to keep children from picking up the cigarrete habit.

And not a one want to take an old geezers pipe away.

We are a privileged minority of geezers.

They give us the discounts at the buffets.:)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jacob74

ssjones

Moderator
Staff member
May 11, 2011
19,182
13,667
Covington, Louisiana
postimg.cc
They seek groups of voters. We're sadly too small in number. The cigar lobbyist my wife worked with in Maryland was surprised there were still active pipe smokers. Lobbyists can force legislative change, individuals rarely do.

In Maryland, the top submissions (email/letters/calls) my wife received was for:
1. 2nd Amendment rights
2. Legalizing gay marriage (that passed)
3. Transgender rights

Her job was to inform the Senator on how many communications were received. He never saw or read any himself (several Senators). That's how things work at the state level.
 

Briar Lee

Lifer
Sep 4, 2021
5,372
15,336
Humansville Missouri
True, but they do care about votes!

They care about themselves, first, then their family.

Most of them will tend to do the right thing if it doesn’t hurt them, or theirs.

The one lady I remember, who got my attention, called me on a hot day in August when I had two outside unit air conditioners running to cool my 4,500 square foot home.

I looked at my wife and son, cool as cucumbers, and I resolved to help her if I could.

It took three years to find the money after we hired eight new assistant coaches for the boy’s football team.:)

Ever notice the representatives and senators never, ever attack beer and wine?

They have some in the fridge, or they know people who do.

There are many who rail against cigarettes, but who wants to take a geezer’s pipe out of his mouth?
 

HawkeyeLinus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2020
6,154
43,231
Midwest
True, but they do care about votes!
No state or federal legislator would feel threatened by the possible withholding of future votes by the electorally insignificant legion of pipe smokers - you really think whatever party your sitting legislator belongs to, he or she believes for one second the other party's alternative for that office would support this or make political hay out of it in a real election campaign - guaranteed ill advised campaign issue. You're basically threatening not to vote for anyone which means it can't effect change - but still the U.S. of A., one has every right to try but realism has to enter into it.

No political calculation makes this make sense.

And not harping on it, but nobody would have a reason or incentive to make statements proclaiming pipe smoking to have relatively fewer health risks than smoking something else - they don't make such proclamations or statements nor would take a suggestion they "recognize" something seriously. Smoking has risks, most of the country would subscribe to that view (because it is true) without diving into the weeds of which form of smoking gets you less risk of a negative heath consequence, and just diving into those waters muddies the issues beyond any real discussion. That horse left the barn and isn't returning to the political landscape.

If the actual industry has any ability to influence via lobbying, and so forth, that's where nuts and bolts kind of things may happen to effect or affect change and we benefit or lose as they benefit or lose - a literal or figurative fifty smoker march on the Capitol won't do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warren

warren

Lifer
Sep 13, 2013
12,458
18,980
Foothills of the Chugach Range, AK
Assuming a politician received such a missive. What is there in it that is a positive for him/her? Votes? Hardly! Moneys? I suppose you could enclose a check for their campaign.

We tobacco users are simply on the wrong side of the issue. Subsidizing tobacco farmers with tax payer moneys was acceptable when tobacco states had powerful elected officials. Not the case any longer.

What I want is less collectivism, socialism and such. But, that is where the majority of voters want the US to go. Obviously with less waste though. I want my elected officials to wrestle with meaningful issues not little "boutique" issues like tobacco. Shouldn't even be on anyone's radar unless, of course, you happen to enjoy the weed. Even I, as a user of tobacco can't defend such use. Sure our "ox" is being gored that's true. But, he's a wee "ox", not worth noticing in the mix of important issues. Not worth the interest of government except that reducing tobacco use is a "good thing" overall as you, perhaps inadvertently, pointed out in your suggested "missive."