This post isn't meant to be a rustication, yes or no, thread. Some like it; some don't; some don't care. Okay. I think rustication really breaks down into several categories that are different. There are carved rustications (although most are carved in some sense) that either have a close pattern or grooves, etc..) Examples of mine are a Cassano poker with a looping pattern, obviously hand done, or a Kaywoodie Ruff-Tone with basically a matte finish, no grain visible, with vertical grooves running down the bowl and shank. Then there are the uniform distressed finishes, some of them uniform enough to look almost like sandblast except they follow no grain pattern, or the Peterson rustication that is uniform but less intricately done. The most basic rustication to my mind is Stanwell's brushed black and brown, that look done with a wire brush. I actually like rustication, selectively. It adds texture and interest to pipes, and keeps the pipes' prices down, which is sometimes (often) a good thing. Does the fact that rustication often "hides" lesser briar and specific flaws sour the finish for you? I can see how pipe smokers "used to better" would find the finish too utilitarian, but it can also lend a sturdy, unpretentious look that is appealing. I like my Savinelli, Rossi, Peterson, Stanwell, Nording, BC, and other rusticated pipes. There are others that I have seen but wouldn't own. I also like the feel of most rustication, adding a little tactile interest to pipes. Do you refuse to own rusticated pipes? Do you have some you like, and what kind? This is a discussion, not a vote ... what do you think?