Retrohale: yes or no?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

macaroon

Starting to Get Obsessed
Oct 2, 2015
279
96
Michigan
Only occasionally, maybe a few times per smoke. I don't like to do it too often, or else the aroma of smoke is stuck in my nose long after I've set down the pipe, which some folks may enjoy, but not I.

 

okiepiper

Might Stick Around
Jan 4, 2019
54
0
I do on almost every smoke. The only time I don't retrohale is when a tobacco produces a harsh burn on retrohale. Old Joe Krantz is one that burns my nasal cavity a little.

 

redone

Starting to Get Obsessed
Aug 4, 2018
284
76
I do it every few sips of the pipe and enjoy it with some blends more than others. Va/Pers seem to give more flavor to me than Burley blends. But I still enjoy it with burley blends.

 

georgebmcclelland

Starting to Get Obsessed
Nov 27, 2018
270
24
I retro-hale because I love tobacco and, well, it's just a lovely thing to do. Hell, I'd blow the darn stuff out of my ears if I could.

 
May 9, 2018
1,687
88
Raleigh, NC
I usually do, but not with every puff. I'll breathe smoke the majority of the time, and when I'm ready to expel what smoke I have in my mouth, I will retrohale it most of the time. Occasionally with a heavy latakia presence, I'll get that burn in my nose like eating a super healthy portion of wasabi. That'll get you going in the morning. Most aros don't burn too badly when retrohaled and I'll usually do it more with those than with a heavy latakia.

 

luigi

Can't Leave
May 16, 2017
460
1,304
Europe
Yes for me. I do it automatically and would have to concentrate to only puff. A smoke coming out of my schnoz smells and tastes better.

 

renfield

Lifer
Oct 16, 2011
5,191
42,657
Kansas
Yes to retrohaling. Especially with subtle Virginias.
Interestingly on other forums retrohaling is referred to as snorking. Not that there’s anything wrong with it. . .

 

economistandfisherman

Starting to Get Obsessed
Dec 11, 2018
257
3
If you look at the ranking peer-reviewed research on pipe smoking and health complications over the past 15 or 20 years, many studies will break down pipe smokers by depth of inhaling...usually something like "none" "slight" and "deep". Since these studies are survey based, the standard sort of caveat applies that "none" usually means non-intentional inhaling...it doesn't mean that these people don't actually inhale, they just don't make a point of inhaling. As was mentioned in a post above, you can't taste the flavor (especially of an aromatic) without at least taking some smoke in--its simply biology. That said, slight (I think) would be those that intentionally either retro hale or french inhale (like I do...i.e., blow out the mouth and inhale a small portion of smoke through the nose); deep inhale would be what my grandfather did which was every 3 or 4 puffs, he would literally inhale through the mouth that last puff and take it in deeply.
All that said, there is an excellent study done back in 2004 that out of the pipe smokers in this study, 5243 of them responded "none", 1741 responded "slight", and 1091 responded "deep"...in percentage terms this would mean that roughly 36% consciously inhale, with roughly 22% of those being retro or french inhalers.
So, since this is a relatively large study, I would assume that the percentage of these in the population would be about the same.
(Note: of course there is sample bias going on here. I'm sure that some of those that responded "none" in fact do consciously inhale, they just aren't telling the survey taker that for whatever reason.)

 
Status
Not open for further replies.