I've discovered something kind of interesting, but I'm not sure how much value there is in it. I recently flew to Atlanta on business and brought along some pipes and a couple tins of tobacco. A couple weeks after returning, I wanted to share some of the 2012 HH Acadian Perique that I'd taken with me, but as I went through my tins, I couldn't find any open ones. Checking my cellar inventory, I determined that I had found all the tins, so one of them was the one I had taken on my trip. Weighing them, one was several grams shy of the others, so clearly that was the tin. Apparently, the cabin pressurization resealed the tin. It gave a healthy Whoosh when I opened it, just like a new tin.
Last night I ran across a large FoodSaver storage container which I saved for some reason, even though I found it utterly useless, since it loses pressure in just a few days. As an experiment, I stuck an open coin style tin inside the container and applied vacuum. Voila! Resealed tin. I then tried the more difficult task of resealing a square tin. Since there are no threads on the square tins, the lid doesn't sit tight enough to be sealed without some mechanical pressure being applied at the same time. I used a removable zip tie around it and applied vacuum. It worked. The jar is big enough to hold four or five coin-style tins, so it goes pretty fast. Now, how long these seals will be good is anybody's guess, particularly for the square tins.
So, is there value in this, beyond providing a mechanism for resale fraud? Practically speaking, probably not. It's hard to imagine bothering with vacuum sealing when there are simpler storage methods that work just fine. I presently use a combination of jars and mylar bags. Maybe the best use I can think of is to occasionally pull some of my square tins from my cellar and apply a bit of vacuum, just to be sure they're well-sealed. I'm not even sure that's a good idea, since pulling air through the seal effectively unseals it for a moment. Yet another opportunity for a long-term test.