Yo Pec et al
Many acrylics in general, and Lucite in particular, are polymethylmethacrylate. How the finished plastic would respond to solvent attack and stresses would depend on the processes in forming the piece and stuff like the molecular weight distribution of the polymer chains. Just because both ethanol and isopropanol evaporate quickly wouldn't necessarily be the main factor. If there was any porosity or microcracks (or cracks) in the pipestem or if there is a tendency for the alcohol molecules to be absorbed, reacted or bound (hydrogen bonding or plain molecular attraction - this is the way soap works on oils) by something in the stem; and especially if there was latent stress within the pipestem structure, that latent pressure could be relieved suddenly by the exposure to a solvent.
My guess, since most Radice stems, and for that matter, most Lucite and acrylic stems, do not seem to fail Peck's way in great numbers, is that a combination of factors obtain here:
1) his 4 Radices have in common whatever acrylic stems Radice uses
2) maybe Radice uses heat and/or physical shaping in a unique way to form the buttons
3) Peck has an unusual way of clenching or biting on his stems, that induces or aggravates latent stresses
4) he puts alcohol on the stems.
Although ethanol and isopropanol are similar (compared to water, hydrocarbons, acids, ketones, esters, etc) chemically, they do differ in solvency effects. One set of plastic pieces may be fine with the one alcohol, but not the other.
hp
les