I think I've found out that with pipes, as with an ecosystem's net primary production, it mostly comes down to temperature and moisture. Given that not all tobaccos burn the same, I was wondering if pipe shapes, stems angles, and/or other design features make a given pipe suit a certain kind of tobacco best.
I was reading a few reviews the other night and stumbled upon this, on the reviews of MacBaren 7 Seas Royal: "A Small Half Bent gives the best results, lots of creamy smoke and a tiny bit of taste". Got me wondering, especially since my last smoking session last Tuesday which was a rather bittersweet experience.
I had packed my Vincenzo churchwarden to ~1/3 of the bowl, since I didn't have much time to smoke. The tobacco in question was an aromatic shop blend from my local B&M (that 'best for beginners' aromatic I bought when I first purchased the pipe [my first one]), which I had let dry for a few days till to an 'optimal' moisture content. The tobacco lit fine and seemed to be burning alright, not so many relights, but still a few. I was getting excited because for the first time I was finally getting the tobacco's flavour, but halfway through the smoke I had to start relighting more. Then I had to stop as I had to go to class. After class I relit my pipe and this time I would get only like 2-4 puffs before it'd go out and I had to relight again.
Long story short, I was getting a sore tongue and was having a heck of a time keeping it lit, so I stopped and actually had to throw out ~1/6 of the bowl. Tobacco was unburnt. Ouch.
My tongue felt bitten but none too bad and even when waking up the next morning I thought it wasn't that bad and maybe I'd be able to have another pipe on Wednesday. Well, by noon my tongue was very sore. One of the worst tongue burns I've experienced. I haven't smoked since then, though I'm thinking of having half a flake of MacBaren's Navy Flake to-night. Maybe.
Now, I know that aromatics burn hotter and the churchwardens cooling the smoke is more of a myth than real occurrence, but I was wondering if a different pipe or pipe shape would suit aromatics more. Maybe I should relegate the churchwarden to English blends.
Thoughts?
I was reading a few reviews the other night and stumbled upon this, on the reviews of MacBaren 7 Seas Royal: "A Small Half Bent gives the best results, lots of creamy smoke and a tiny bit of taste". Got me wondering, especially since my last smoking session last Tuesday which was a rather bittersweet experience.
I had packed my Vincenzo churchwarden to ~1/3 of the bowl, since I didn't have much time to smoke. The tobacco in question was an aromatic shop blend from my local B&M (that 'best for beginners' aromatic I bought when I first purchased the pipe [my first one]), which I had let dry for a few days till to an 'optimal' moisture content. The tobacco lit fine and seemed to be burning alright, not so many relights, but still a few. I was getting excited because for the first time I was finally getting the tobacco's flavour, but halfway through the smoke I had to start relighting more. Then I had to stop as I had to go to class. After class I relit my pipe and this time I would get only like 2-4 puffs before it'd go out and I had to relight again.
Long story short, I was getting a sore tongue and was having a heck of a time keeping it lit, so I stopped and actually had to throw out ~1/6 of the bowl. Tobacco was unburnt. Ouch.
My tongue felt bitten but none too bad and even when waking up the next morning I thought it wasn't that bad and maybe I'd be able to have another pipe on Wednesday. Well, by noon my tongue was very sore. One of the worst tongue burns I've experienced. I haven't smoked since then, though I'm thinking of having half a flake of MacBaren's Navy Flake to-night. Maybe.
Now, I know that aromatics burn hotter and the churchwardens cooling the smoke is more of a myth than real occurrence, but I was wondering if a different pipe or pipe shape would suit aromatics more. Maybe I should relegate the churchwarden to English blends.
Thoughts?






: