Pipe Photography

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

sablebrush52

The Bard Of Barlings
Jun 15, 2013
21,580
52,840
Southern Oregon
jrs457.wixsite.com
Yes, you can say that Kodachrome 25 in 4x5 under ideal lighting, processed by skilled technicians and printed by hand on Cibachrome produced a wider color gamut. But how many people, in real life, got to use and see that level of film technology?
I did.
The only issues I had with digital color space, which no longer apply, was the difficulty dealing with gradients in 8 bit and the level of noise in shadow. Also the relatively low image resolution that cameras were offering until a few years ago didn't appeal to me. Those limitations have long since gone bye bye. Getting predictable color output back to a print was also tricky until good color management software became available.
Photoshop has certainly come a long way since I first stated using it in my work 20+ years ago. We have much better tools today.
Now I'm thoroughly sold on digital photography.
Which, is probably a topic for another forum.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.