Peter Stokebye Cube Cut vs Sutliff ERR Match

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

DotAndBang’sPipes

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jun 27, 2016
227
543
43
Orlando, FL
Having not been around to enjoy ERR I came across PS Cube Cut and have fallen in love with the flavor and the burley and the easy-to-pack cube cut! I also recently purchased the Sutliff ERR Match and have been comparing the two. (I have yet to try the Lane Limited ERR Match). I wondered if anyone had comments on the similarities or differences between the Sutliff Match vs Stokebye's. I'm not as interested in which one is closer to the original ERR as to how they are alike and unalike each other. Thus far the Cube Cut smells sweeter in the pouch but the Sutliff seems to taste better all around. Anyone else compared these two in particular? Thanks, AP.

 

jackswilling

Lifer
Feb 15, 2015
1,777
24
Jim Inks has on tobacco reviews in great detail. I tend to agree with your assessment on Sutliff.

 

tuold

Lifer
Oct 15, 2013
2,133
168
Beaverton,Oregon
I recently tried some of that Peter Stokkebye cube cut. I do like the taste. The only down side is related to one of it's advantages. It's easy to load cube cut tobacco but it's also easy to accidentally unload it as well! I've had it roll out on me a couple of times even if I've packed it tightly.
Try the PS 702 Burley.I like that one too, better than the PS 312 Toasted Burley.

 

shutterbugg

Lifer
Nov 18, 2013
1,451
22
Never tried the Stokkebye, but if it's actually got some nicotene, unlike LRR and the Sutliff match, I'm game. To answer the OP question, LRR is not a cube cut like the Sutliff. I've tried both and prefer the latter. Plus it's available in small quantities, you don't need to buy a huge cannister of it. One of only two Sutliff blends I like, the other being EGR.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.